RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    비전통적 안보위협의 부상에 따른 다국적 실험의 유용성 고찰 = Analyzing the Usefulness on Multinational Experiment under Non-Traditional Security Threats

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82769800

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Today`s global security environment is characterized by concerns over increased transnational and non-military threats rather than persisting conventional military threats. These aspects of global disputes are requiring more international or regional security collaboration because the perceived threats has become more complicated or multifarious involving ground, maritime and air as well as cyber and outer space. To make matters worse, the damage disperses not only to any specific country but also to many unspecified countries. Faced with this new security environment, advanced countries including NATO members, U. S. alliances and governmental interagency of the U. S. led by United States Joint Forces Command have been developing Joint Concept and Execution, and Multinational Experimentation(MNE) as a common countermeasure against these unpredictable threats for 11 years while feeling comprehensive approach necessity. But Korea has not participating in this movement, however, now has joined the MNE as an observer country since 2008. This article analyzes whether the MNE technical experimental method and its products are necessary and practical to Korean Armed Forces and strengthening its security capabilities. As a result, MNE is assuming a roll not only as a military collaborative main body among the membership countries involving intergovernmental organizations and international organizations under United Nations but also growing as a worldwide discussion community in the wake of sharing information, common awareness on new threats and cooperating strategically with other participants. In addition, the MNE can reduce the national defensive cost as an effective alternative as well as helping Korean PKO and ROK-US combined operations in the North Korean area in the future. So this article drew up some proposals in order to participate positively in MNE.
    번역하기

    Today`s global security environment is characterized by concerns over increased transnational and non-military threats rather than persisting conventional military threats. These aspects of global disputes are requiring more international or regional ...

    Today`s global security environment is characterized by concerns over increased transnational and non-military threats rather than persisting conventional military threats. These aspects of global disputes are requiring more international or regional security collaboration because the perceived threats has become more complicated or multifarious involving ground, maritime and air as well as cyber and outer space. To make matters worse, the damage disperses not only to any specific country but also to many unspecified countries. Faced with this new security environment, advanced countries including NATO members, U. S. alliances and governmental interagency of the U. S. led by United States Joint Forces Command have been developing Joint Concept and Execution, and Multinational Experimentation(MNE) as a common countermeasure against these unpredictable threats for 11 years while feeling comprehensive approach necessity. But Korea has not participating in this movement, however, now has joined the MNE as an observer country since 2008. This article analyzes whether the MNE technical experimental method and its products are necessary and practical to Korean Armed Forces and strengthening its security capabilities. As a result, MNE is assuming a roll not only as a military collaborative main body among the membership countries involving intergovernmental organizations and international organizations under United Nations but also growing as a worldwide discussion community in the wake of sharing information, common awareness on new threats and cooperating strategically with other participants. In addition, the MNE can reduce the national defensive cost as an effective alternative as well as helping Korean PKO and ROK-US combined operations in the North Korean area in the future. So this article drew up some proposals in order to participate positively in MNE.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국 외무부 홈페이지"

    2 "한국 국방부 홈페이지"

    3 서보혁, "탈냉전기 한반도 안보질서 변화에 관한 연구: 남·북·미 전략적 삼각관계를 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 63-85, 2008

    4 함택영, "안전보장의 국제정치학" 사회평론 2010

    5 정상화, "안보개념의 변화와 비전통안보의 부상" 세종연구소 6 (6): 2010

    6 정해일, "아시아 태평양지역 군 최고 지휘관회의를 다녀와서"

    7 이수형, "비전통적 안보개념: 등장배경, 유형 및 속성, in 안전보장의 국제 정치학" 주 사회평론 2010

    8 이신화, "비전통안보와 동북아지역협력" 한국정치학회 42 (42): 411-434, 2008

    9 이수형, "북대서양조약기구(NATO)와 국제연합(UN) 안보리와의 역학관계: 탈냉전 이후 나토의 집단안보 역할을 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 89-112, 2008

    10 "미합참 합동/동맹전투발전부 소개 자료(5050 Final JCW/lkw, 30 November 2011)"

    1 "한국 외무부 홈페이지"

    2 "한국 국방부 홈페이지"

    3 서보혁, "탈냉전기 한반도 안보질서 변화에 관한 연구: 남·북·미 전략적 삼각관계를 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 63-85, 2008

    4 함택영, "안전보장의 국제정치학" 사회평론 2010

    5 정상화, "안보개념의 변화와 비전통안보의 부상" 세종연구소 6 (6): 2010

    6 정해일, "아시아 태평양지역 군 최고 지휘관회의를 다녀와서"

    7 이수형, "비전통적 안보개념: 등장배경, 유형 및 속성, in 안전보장의 국제 정치학" 주 사회평론 2010

    8 이신화, "비전통안보와 동북아지역협력" 한국정치학회 42 (42): 411-434, 2008

    9 이수형, "북대서양조약기구(NATO)와 국제연합(UN) 안보리와의 역학관계: 탈냉전 이후 나토의 집단안보 역할을 중심으로" 세종연구소 14 (14): 89-112, 2008

    10 "미합참 합동/동맹전투발전부 소개 자료(5050 Final JCW/lkw, 30 November 2011)"

    11 "미국방부와 국외팀 네트웍 시스템 홈페이지"

    12 "미 합동전력사 홈페이지"

    13 "미 국방부의 지휘통제 연구 프로그램"

    14 "미 국방부 홈페이지"

    15 "미 국무부 PSI 관련 홈페이지"

    16 조용만, "다국적 실험 발전방안 연구" 전략문제연구소 2010

    17 국방부, "국방백서 2010" 2010

    18 김열수, "국가안보" 범문사 2010

    19 최종건, "구성주의 국제정치이론과 안전보장, in 안전보장의 국제정치학" 사회평론 2010

    20 "걸프만 협력기구 홈페이지"

    21 SIPRI, "the SIPRI yearbook"

    22 Gilpin, Robert, "The Political Economy of International Relations" PrincetonUniversity Press 1987

    23 CSIS, "Suvival"

    24 Carson, Rachel, "Silent Spring" Houghton Mifflin Company 1962

    25 King, Gray, "Rethinking Human security" 116 (116): 2001

    26 Matthews, Jessica T, "Redefining Security" Foreign Affairs 1989

    27 Ullman, Richard H, "Redefining Security" 8 (8): 1983

    28 Buzan, Barry, "People, State and Fear" Harvester 1983

    29 Institute for Far Eastern Studies, "Non-Traditional Security Issues in North Korea" 2010

    30 IISS, "Military Balance"

    31 "MNE6 Final Report" Multinational Experimentation Joint Forces Lab 2011

    32 CJCSI3010.02B, "Joint Operation Concepts Development Process"

    33 "JCD&E Life Cycle Management Framework (JCD&E Orientation Brief, August 2010)"

    34 Nye, Joseph S, "International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field" 12 (12): 1988

    35 Jorge, Nef J, "Human Security and Mutual Vulnerability: Coordinating National and Multilateral Responses: The United Nations and New Security Agenda" United Nations Association in Canada 2001

    36 Newman, Edward, "Human Security and Constructivism" 2 (2): 2001

    37 "Guide for Understanding and Implementing Defense Experimentation. version 1.1"

    38 "Global Security Organization Forum 홈페이지"

    39 Noland, Janne E, "Global Engagement: Cooperation and Security in the 21st Century" The Brooking Institution 1994

    40 Knorr, Klaus, "Economic Issues and National Security" Regents Press of Kansas for National Security Education Program 1977

    41 Alberts, David S, "EXPERIMENTATION" CCRP Publication Series 2002

    42 Axworthy, Lioyd N, "An Address On Human Security" 1999

    43 Wirtz James J., "A New Agenda for Security and Strategy" Oxford University Press 2007

    44 허세만, "2010년 CHOD 회의, 한 ․ 미 공동개최의 의미"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-08-22 학회명변경 영문명 : Research Institute On National Security Affairs -> Research Institute for National Security Affairs KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.63 0.63 0.73
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.69 0.61 0.972 0.29
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼