한국영화에 나타난 직업의식의 고정관념을 왜곡시킨 이미지에 대한 논의 = 2006년도 한국영화 속의 선생님 역할을 중심으로

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Now Korean films make confuse audience's emotion. Because Korean film makers think that private interest takes precedence of public interest. In the result of their film works to disgrace traditional moral and to make a false representation of real life. Specially in film industry part the distorted occupational consciousness of Korean film effects audience's emotion bad influences. We cognize that Constitutional institution gurantees 'the free of expression' and also restrict 'the free of public'.
At this point of time Korean film how to deal symbolic face especially the face of teacher. Now in postmoderntimes the conception of face is disorgnized and objected the unique of face. The signs of various the disorganizing face presents a confused standard value about the character of the occupational and responsibility consciousness.
After liberal Korea a famous Korean film to show the teacher of the imaging devoted himself to students are Prosecutor and Woman teacher(1947) and Story of Teacher, Wyryoung to Seoul(1962). We confirm that the symbolic face of teacher presents the devoted meaning of face to the spectator in Korean film. But now Korean film shows the negative image of teacher's face which is disorganized a various style. and character.
Specially the representation of teacher's occupational consciousness in 2006's Korean fillms unimaginable make disgrace the position of revered teacher. Teacher and Gang's Boss in a body(2006) to introduce a teacher come from gang, Teacher Kim, Bongdu(2006) to describe a teacher interesting mony than education, Woman Professor's Secretly Channing (2006) which scorning the manner of intelligent proffessor, In Favors of One's Teacher(2006) students hurted their mind revenging their teacher. However we talking about come to Mo sleeps with Her(2006) which shows the discourse of violence and sex for the teacher, We cannot say anything beyond value.
We say beforet the movie is the dream, we think the movie is a work to represent real life ane to symbolize a image for art. So if making illusion and actuality with unique toward the value of Korean culture, a face in film familly comes to us and rebirths a real image.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 여는말
• 2. 표현의 자유와 공개의 자유
• 3. 영화 속 얼굴의 상징성 그리고 재현적 의미
• 4. 재현과 이미지 그리고 그 이미지의 대표성
• 5. 이미지의 대표성에 대한 관객의 인식
• 6. 맺음말
• 참고 문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "헌법재판소 결정, 사건 93헌가13 영화법 제12조 등에 대한 위헌제청 91헌 바10 영화법 제12조에 대한 헌법소원" 1996.10.4

2 김수남, "한국영화의 쟁점과 사유" 문예마당 1997

3 한국영상자료원, "한국영화데이터베이스" 한국영상자료원

4 "한국문화정신연구원" 1994

5 자크오몽, "영화 속의 얼굴" 마음산책 2006

6 김수남, "스크린쿼터지키기의 문화적 의미" 1999

7 김선아, "몸의 장르와 미메시스 영화관객성" 영상예술학회 (8) : 29-60, 2006

8 "매일신문, 2006년 5월 24일자" 매일신문 2006.5.24

9 강현두, "?영상문화에 있어서 한국과 미국? ??예술과 비평??" 1986년6월

10 임재철 외 옮김, "??대중영화의 이해??" 한나래 1993