RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    특집2 : 한스 벨팅의 종교미술 연구: 도상에서 기능으로 = Hans Belting`s Studies on Icon: From Meaning to Function

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This essay brings to light Hans Belting`s thesis on icon and its art historical contribution in the Post-Panofskian era. My discussion focuses on two of his major works, Image and its Public in the Middle Ages (New Rochelle, New York, 1990; German original published in Berlin, 1981) and Likeness and Presence: a History of the Image before the Era of Art (Chicago, 1991; German original published in München, 1990). These works, both translated into English, have been widely circulated and read among the academic communities beyond the field of art history, turning his name into THE authority on the issue of icon. The historians of religious art usually point out as his most important contribution the way Belting narrated the comprehensive history of icon by connecting successfully its Eastern prototypes to their offshoots in the West. This aspect indeed is very significant, given the contemporary situation of our academic field where the Western European and the Byzantine art histories are deemed as separate specialties. On the other hand, I see as the most important that Belting discussed icon not in search of the mystified “latent meaning” of Panofskian iconography, but as regards its function in the context of liturgical and para-liturgical devotion. Furthermore, he widened the scope of icon`s function from the mere receptacle of our veneration to the manifestation of the presence of the holy. For criticism, I have to point out that such an ambitious attempt to write a meta-history of icon, literally from its beginning to the end, is inevitably prone to generalization and thus vulnerable.
    번역하기

    This essay brings to light Hans Belting`s thesis on icon and its art historical contribution in the Post-Panofskian era. My discussion focuses on two of his major works, Image and its Public in the Middle Ages (New Rochelle, New York, 1990; German ori...

    This essay brings to light Hans Belting`s thesis on icon and its art historical contribution in the Post-Panofskian era. My discussion focuses on two of his major works, Image and its Public in the Middle Ages (New Rochelle, New York, 1990; German original published in Berlin, 1981) and Likeness and Presence: a History of the Image before the Era of Art (Chicago, 1991; German original published in München, 1990). These works, both translated into English, have been widely circulated and read among the academic communities beyond the field of art history, turning his name into THE authority on the issue of icon. The historians of religious art usually point out as his most important contribution the way Belting narrated the comprehensive history of icon by connecting successfully its Eastern prototypes to their offshoots in the West. This aspect indeed is very significant, given the contemporary situation of our academic field where the Western European and the Byzantine art histories are deemed as separate specialties. On the other hand, I see as the most important that Belting discussed icon not in search of the mystified “latent meaning” of Panofskian iconography, but as regards its function in the context of liturgical and para-liturgical devotion. Furthermore, he widened the scope of icon`s function from the mere receptacle of our veneration to the manifestation of the presence of the holy. For criticism, I have to point out that such an ambitious attempt to write a meta-history of icon, literally from its beginning to the end, is inevitably prone to generalization and thus vulnerable.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 June 1983, "Sixten Ringbom. ?Das Bild und sein Publikum im Mittelalter Form und Funktion fr?her Bildtafeln der Passion? [book review]. Art Bulletin LXV/2" 339-340,

    2 Richard W. Pfaff, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art by Hans Belting; Edmund Jephcott" 65 (65): 99-101, Mar1996

    3 Leslie Brubaker, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art by Hans Belting" 76 (76): 680-681, Oct1996

    4 John Elsner, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence. A History of the Image before the Era of Art by H. Belting" 45 (45): 373-375, 1995

    5 no. 3, "Michael Camille. ?Bild und Kult eine Geschichte des Bildes vor dem Zeitalter der Kunst? [book review]. Art bulletin v. 74" 514-517, 1992

    6 Zeitler, Barbara, "Likeness and Presence : a history of the image for the era of art" 12 (12): 148-150, 1996

    7 Andrew Louth, "Likeness and Presence : a history of the image before the era of art" 47 (47): 705-709, 1996

    8 "Henk van Os. ?Das Bild und sein Publikum im Mittelalter Form und Funktion fr?her Bildtafeln der Passion? [book review]. Simiolus XIV/3-4" 225-227, 1984

    1 June 1983, "Sixten Ringbom. ?Das Bild und sein Publikum im Mittelalter Form und Funktion fr?her Bildtafeln der Passion? [book review]. Art Bulletin LXV/2" 339-340,

    2 Richard W. Pfaff, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art by Hans Belting; Edmund Jephcott" 65 (65): 99-101, Mar1996

    3 Leslie Brubaker, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art by Hans Belting" 76 (76): 680-681, Oct1996

    4 John Elsner, "Reviewed Work: Likeness and Presence. A History of the Image before the Era of Art by H. Belting" 45 (45): 373-375, 1995

    5 no. 3, "Michael Camille. ?Bild und Kult eine Geschichte des Bildes vor dem Zeitalter der Kunst? [book review]. Art bulletin v. 74" 514-517, 1992

    6 Zeitler, Barbara, "Likeness and Presence : a history of the image for the era of art" 12 (12): 148-150, 1996

    7 Andrew Louth, "Likeness and Presence : a history of the image before the era of art" 47 (47): 705-709, 1996

    8 "Henk van Os. ?Das Bild und sein Publikum im Mittelalter Form und Funktion fr?her Bildtafeln der Passion? [book review]. Simiolus XIV/3-4" 225-227, 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.37 0.37 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.46 0.45 0.903 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼