RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공감하고 실천하는 민주시민을 기르는 역사수업 - ‘정서적 감정이입(affective empathy)’을 적용한 수업 방안 모색 - = The History Classes to Grow a Democratic Citizen Who Empathizes and Practices. - the Teaching Method of Applying ‘Affective Historical Empathy’ -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107320323

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, the newly perceived historical consciousness is related to the students' proper awareness of the historical facts of the past and their interest in the historical issues that have led to the present, and to foster the power to make the better future history on their own. Also, it is to have a citizen's consciousness to make a right decision on a given problem and to practice it at the same time, and to cultivate such a democratic citizen's historical consciousness may be a purpose of history education.
    involves students' interest in the historical issues that have led to the present, while fully aware of the historical facts of the past, and furthermore, I will develop the power to make the better future history on their own.
    Meanwhile, Barton and Levstik, who emphasized democratic citizenship education in that history education should contribute to promoting common good and participatory democracy, insisted that historical empathy is a useful principle of instruction for cultivating citizenship. In particular, criticizing the emphasis on only cognitive inquiry, they suggested that affective factors such as empathy and identification should be actively combined into historical empathy. Barton and Levstik's views have been developed by researchers at local and abroad into the discussion of the re-conceptualization to properly combine historical empathy with the cognitive inquiry processes and affective elements. It is clear that these discussions are possible logic when integrating concepts based on the studies of scholars and teaching strategies of teachers.
    In addition to the discussion of re-conceptualization of historical empathy and analysis of class cases using sympathy and emotion, this study specifically designed a teaching plan based on the hypothesis that historical empathy applying affective dimension can greatly contribute to the growth of students as democratic citizens, and tried to find the possibility. At the same time, through the class, this study tried finding that Barton and Levstik's ‘affective empathy’ called ‘caring’ embodies the driving force that students lead the knowledge and consciousness of history learned in classes to the practice of action as the core of the civic competency.
    In conclusion, historical empathy should be conceptualized as the principle of instruction that combines both tools of cognitive inquiry and affective elements. Especially, the application of ‘affective empathy’ called ‘caring’ is a factor that exerts more aggressive sympathy among students, and it could be used as a key teaching principle of democratic civic education in that it plays a role in promoting interest in the ‘common good’ such as human rights, peace, and coexistence.
    번역하기

    Recently, the newly perceived historical consciousness is related to the students' proper awareness of the historical facts of the past and their interest in the historical issues that have led to the present, and to foster the power to make the bette...

    Recently, the newly perceived historical consciousness is related to the students' proper awareness of the historical facts of the past and their interest in the historical issues that have led to the present, and to foster the power to make the better future history on their own. Also, it is to have a citizen's consciousness to make a right decision on a given problem and to practice it at the same time, and to cultivate such a democratic citizen's historical consciousness may be a purpose of history education.
    involves students' interest in the historical issues that have led to the present, while fully aware of the historical facts of the past, and furthermore, I will develop the power to make the better future history on their own.
    Meanwhile, Barton and Levstik, who emphasized democratic citizenship education in that history education should contribute to promoting common good and participatory democracy, insisted that historical empathy is a useful principle of instruction for cultivating citizenship. In particular, criticizing the emphasis on only cognitive inquiry, they suggested that affective factors such as empathy and identification should be actively combined into historical empathy. Barton and Levstik's views have been developed by researchers at local and abroad into the discussion of the re-conceptualization to properly combine historical empathy with the cognitive inquiry processes and affective elements. It is clear that these discussions are possible logic when integrating concepts based on the studies of scholars and teaching strategies of teachers.
    In addition to the discussion of re-conceptualization of historical empathy and analysis of class cases using sympathy and emotion, this study specifically designed a teaching plan based on the hypothesis that historical empathy applying affective dimension can greatly contribute to the growth of students as democratic citizens, and tried to find the possibility. At the same time, through the class, this study tried finding that Barton and Levstik's ‘affective empathy’ called ‘caring’ embodies the driving force that students lead the knowledge and consciousness of history learned in classes to the practice of action as the core of the civic competency.
    In conclusion, historical empathy should be conceptualized as the principle of instruction that combines both tools of cognitive inquiry and affective elements. Especially, the application of ‘affective empathy’ called ‘caring’ is a factor that exerts more aggressive sympathy among students, and it could be used as a key teaching principle of democratic civic education in that it plays a role in promoting interest in the ‘common good’ such as human rights, peace, and coexistence.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김한종, "歷史敎育의 理論과 方法" 삼지원 1997

    2 Barton, Keith C., "초․중학교에서 학생들과 조사 연구하는 역사하기, 3판" 아카데미프레스 2007

    3 백은진, "중등 역사교사의 역사교육 목적에 대한 인식과 수업 실천" 10 : 2014

    4 金漢宗, "역사학습에서의 상상적 이해" 서울大學校 大學院 1994

    5 김한종, "역사수업의 원리" 책과함께 2007

    6 방지원, "역사수업 원리로서 ‘감정이입적 역사이해’의 재개념화 필요성과 방향의 모색" 한국역사교육학회 (20) : 7-48, 2014

    7 Barton, Keith C., "역사는 왜 가르쳐야하는가" 역사비평사 2017

    8 양호환, "역사교육의 입론과 구상" 책과함께 2012

    9 강화정, "역사 교사의 민주주의 인식과 서사 형성" 한국역사교육학회 (21) : 47-87, 2015

    10 강선주, "아이들의 역사 이야기꾼으로의 성장 - 중학교 교사가 추구하는 ‘역사가 가르쳐야 할 것’ -" 역사교육학회 (54) : 25-57, 2015

    1 김한종, "歷史敎育의 理論과 方法" 삼지원 1997

    2 Barton, Keith C., "초․중학교에서 학생들과 조사 연구하는 역사하기, 3판" 아카데미프레스 2007

    3 백은진, "중등 역사교사의 역사교육 목적에 대한 인식과 수업 실천" 10 : 2014

    4 金漢宗, "역사학습에서의 상상적 이해" 서울大學校 大學院 1994

    5 김한종, "역사수업의 원리" 책과함께 2007

    6 방지원, "역사수업 원리로서 ‘감정이입적 역사이해’의 재개념화 필요성과 방향의 모색" 한국역사교육학회 (20) : 7-48, 2014

    7 Barton, Keith C., "역사는 왜 가르쳐야하는가" 역사비평사 2017

    8 양호환, "역사교육의 입론과 구상" 책과함께 2012

    9 강화정, "역사 교사의 민주주의 인식과 서사 형성" 한국역사교육학회 (21) : 47-87, 2015

    10 강선주, "아이들의 역사 이야기꾼으로의 성장 - 중학교 교사가 추구하는 ‘역사가 가르쳐야 할 것’ -" 역사교육학회 (54) : 25-57, 2015

    11 장은주, "시민교육이 희망이다-한국 민주시민교육의 철학과 실천모델" 피어나 2017

    12 방지원, "서평: 역사는 왜 가르쳐야 하는가 키쓰 바튼, 린다 렙스틱 지음/김진아 옮김" 144 : 2017

    13 장미현, "비판적 국민 형성을 위한 역사교육으로-역사교육과 역사 교과서에 대한 4개의 질문, 10인의 응답" 2014

    14 강선주, "비판과 성찰, 문제해결과 창의력의 토대로서 역사교육-역사교육과 역사 교과서에 대한 4개의 질문, 10인의 응답" 107 : 2014

    15 나인호, "문자그대로의 역사교육과 민주시민 양성-역사교육과 역사 교과서에 대한 4개의 질문, 10인의 응답" 2014

    16 이병련, "뤼젠(Rüsen)의 역사의식 학습의 네 가지 형태" 한국역사교육학회 (34) : 181-223, 2019

    17 김정인, "공감의 역사교육: 5·18로의 문화적 여정" 한국역사교육학회 (25) : 299-337, 2016

    18 방지원, "공감과 연대의 역사교육과 ‘과거사’ 문제 - 성찰적 역사교육을 위한 시론 -" 한국역사교육학회 (28) : 115-147, 2017

    19 김한종, "감정이입적 역사이해의 원리와 학습방안" 7 : 2001

    20 김문석, "감정이입을 활용한 역사 수업과 학생의 역사 이해" 9 : 2002

    21 곽병현, "‘정서적 공감’과 ‘실천’으로 사회과수업 다시 읽기 : 세 가지 사회과수업에 대한 반성적 성찰" 한국사회교과교육연구회 2017

    22 허수미, "‘감정이입’을 활용한 사회과 수업 실천 전략" 한국사회과교육연구학회 51 (51): 103-122, 2012

    23 Leur, Tessa De, "‘I Saw Angry People and Broken Statues’: Historical Empathy in secondary History Education" 65 : 2017

    24 Foster, Stuart J., "Using Historical Empathy to Excite Students about the Study of History: Can You Empathize with Neville Chamberlain?" 90 (90): 1999

    25 Ashyby, Rosalyn, "The history curriculum for teachers" Falmer Press 1987

    26 Endacott, Jason L., "Reconsidering Affective Engagement in Historical Empathy" 38 (38): 2010

    27 Lee, Peter J., "History Teaching and Philosophy of History" 22 (22): 1983

    28 Sarah Brooks, "Historical Empathy as Perspective Recognition and Care in One Secondary Social Studies Classroom" 39 : 2011

    29 Foster, Stuart J., "Historical Empathy and perspective in the social studies" Bowman & Littefield 2001

    30 Sarah Brooks, "Displaying historical empathy: What impact can a writing assignment have" 3 (3): 2008

    31 Endacott, Jason L., "An updated theoretical and practical mode for promoting historical empathy" 8 (8): 2013

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.57 0.57 0.6
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.6 0.61 1.054 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼