Explaining the legalization of indigenous women’s gender-specific claims : a comparative case study of the constituent processes of ecuador (1997-98) and bolivia (2006-07)

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. Introduction 1
• II. Backgrounds: Indigenous and Indigenous Womens Movements and the Constituent Processes in Ecuador and Bolivia 4
• 1. Indigenous and Indigenous Womens Movements and the Constituent Process in Ecuador (1997-98) 4
• 2. Indigenous and Indigenous Womens Movements and the Constituent Process in Bolivia (2006-07) 9
• III. Theoretical and Analytical Frameworks 13
• 1. Analytical Framework 13
• 1) Comparative Framework 13
• 2) Case Selection 14
• 3) Controlled Factors 17
• 2. Theoretical Framework: Political Opportunity 26
• 3. Research Hypothesis 31
• IV. Hypothesis Testing 37
• 1. Indigenous Womens Movements Political Opportunity for the Alliance with Indigenous Mixed-Gender Organizations 37
• 1) Relations between the Ecuadorian Indigenous and Indigenous Womens Organizations during the Constituent Process (1997-98) 37
• 2) Relations between the Bolivian Indigenous and Indigenous Womens Organizations during the Constituent Process (2006-07) 41
• 2. Indigenous Womens Movements Political Opportunity for the Alliance with Non-Indigenous Womens Organizations 43
• 1) Relations between the Ecuadorian Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Womens Organizations during the Constituent Process (1997-98) 43
• 2) Relations between the Bolivian Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Womens Organizations during the Constituent Process (2006-07) 45
• 3. Indigenous Womens Movements Political Opportunity for the Alliance with Female Constituent Assembly Members 48
• 4. Codification of the Indigenous Womens Gender-Specific Claims in the Ecuadorian (1998) and the Bolivian (2009) Constitutions 50
• 5. Test Result and Causal Inference 53
• V. Conclusions 55
• Bibliography 58
• Abstract in Spanish 71
• Abstract in Korean 72