RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    한국형 학업부정행위 척도 개발 연구 = Korean Scale of Academic Cheating

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3023057

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Korean Scale of Academic Cheating was developed and validated. The scale was composed of 6 subscales which measured various aspects of cheating perceptions (problem, seriousness, definition, causes, and effective prevention strategies) and cheating experiences. The scale was administered to 698 college students. The reliability for total items was .87 and the reliability range for subscales and factors was .55-.89. Content validity was verified by two experts. Construct validity was validated by factor analyses. The results showed that Problem. Seriousness, Cause Subscale had one factor each. Definition and Experience Subscale had two factors each. Prevention Subscale had 3 factors. Problem, Seriousness. Definition Subscale scores score were significantly and negatively related to Experience Subscale scores while Prevention and Cause Subscale scores were not. This proved criterion-related validity of the subscales.
    번역하기

    Korean Scale of Academic Cheating was developed and validated. The scale was composed of 6 subscales which measured various aspects of cheating perceptions (problem, seriousness, definition, causes, and effective prevention strategies) and cheating ex...

    Korean Scale of Academic Cheating was developed and validated. The scale was composed of 6 subscales which measured various aspects of cheating perceptions (problem, seriousness, definition, causes, and effective prevention strategies) and cheating experiences. The scale was administered to 698 college students. The reliability for total items was .87 and the reliability range for subscales and factors was .55-.89. Content validity was verified by two experts. Construct validity was validated by factor analyses. The results showed that Problem. Seriousness, Cause Subscale had one factor each. Definition and Experience Subscale had two factors each. Prevention Subscale had 3 factors. Problem, Seriousness. Definition Subscale scores score were significantly and negatively related to Experience Subscale scores while Prevention and Cause Subscale scores were not. This proved criterion-related validity of the subscales.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • I.서론
    • II.이론적 배경
    • 1.학업부정행위의 정의와 종류
    • 2.학업부정행위 척도들
    • 3.연구문제
    • I.서론
    • II.이론적 배경
    • 1.학업부정행위의 정의와 종류
    • 2.학업부정행위 척도들
    • 3.연구문제
    • III.연구방법
    • 1.연구대상
    • 2.연구도구
    • IV.연구결과
    • 1.문항-총점 상관
    • 2.신뢰도
    • 3.타당도
    • V.논의 및 결론
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼