술어 명사와 vP의 통사론:최기용(2012)에 대한 답변

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This paper presents a syntactic analysis of verbal noun constructions, in which verbal nouns are directly merged with a verbal element such as sikhita, toyta, hata, and ita. Based on the Distributed Morphology, this paper discusses a structure of a verbal noun, characterized as having an argument structure, which is distinct from nouns in general, and also identifies realization conditions of those verbal elements. Verbal nouns, which are acategorial in themselves, project Root phrases by merging with their internal arguments. Verbal elements such as sikhita, toyta, hata, and ita are analyzed as realizations of v with different feature specifications, which verbalize the Root phrases and determine their types of eventualities. The analysis given in this paper can provide a principled account with asymmetries in argument realizations of verbal noun constructions.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 남길임, "현대 국어 ‘이다’ 구문 연구" 한국문화사 2004

2 최기용, "한국어의 용언 반복 구문(Echoed verb constructions): 용언의 가시적 이동을 위한 또 하나의 근거" 한국생성문법학회 12 (12): 139-168, 2002

3 이병규, "한국어 술어명사문 문법" 한국문화사 2009

4 김용하, "한국어 격과 어순의 최소주의 문법" 한신문화사 1999

5 최현배, "우리말본" 정음사 1971

6 강범모, "술어 명사의 의미 구조" 사단법인 한국언어학회 31 (31): 3-30, 2002

7 홍용철, "소유격 표지 “의”의 분포와 본질" 한국생성문법학회 23 (23): 321-345, 2013

8 이호승, "서술성 명사의 판별과 관련된 몇 문제" 어문연구학회 58 : 115-136, 2008

9 박정섭, "명사구에서의 논항 실현에 관한 고찰 - 불어와 한국어를 중심으로 -" 한국프랑스어문교육학회 16 : 223-248, 2003

10 김인균, "국어의 명사 연결 구성 연구" 서강대학교 대학원 2003

11 이선웅, "국어 명사의 논항구조 연구" 월인 2005

12 최기용, "“행위성 명사+이다” 구문에 대한 반 분산형태론적 분석" 한국생성문법학회 22 (22): 579-593, 2012

13 한선혜, "‘명사-시키다’ 구성과 사전에서의 처리" 4 : 185-221, 2004

14 최기용, "‘-이다’의 ‘이’는 주격 조사이다" 2 : 333-343, 2001

15 Baker, M., "the event of a nominal. The Theta System: Argument Structure at the Interface" Oxford University Press 1988

16 Jung-Min Jo, "Word Order Variations in Korean Copular Constructions" 대한언어학회 15 (15): 209-238, 2007

17 Marantz, A, "Verbal argument structure: events and participants" 130 : 152-168, 2013

18 박소영, "Verbal Noun Constructions Revisited: Restructuring vs. Non-restructuring Complementation" 한국생성문법학회 20 (20): 207-227, 2010

19 Tellier, C., "Underlying nominals and the projection principle" 1990

20 Vergnaud, J. R., "The definite determiner and the inalienable constructions in French and English" 23 : 595-652, 1992

21 Halle, M., "The View from Building 20" MIT Press 111-176, 1993

22 Harley, H., "The Syntax of Aspect" Oxford University Press 2005

23 Chomsky, N., "The Minimalist Program" MIT Press 1995

24 Harley, H., "The Lexicon/Encyclopedia Interface" Elsevier Press 349-374, 2000

25 Harley, H, "Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization" Oxford University Press 321-343, 2009

26 Hale, K., "Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure" MIT Press 1992

27 Kratzer, A, "Phrase Structure and the Lexicon" Kluwer 109-137, 1996

28 Marantz, A., "Phases and words" NYU 2008

29 Larson, R, "On the double object construction" 19 : 335-391, 1988

30 Marantz, A., "No escape from syntax" 4 : 201-225, 1997

31 Harley, H., "Mixed nominalizations, short verb movement and object shift in English" 28 : 1998

32 Tenny, C., "Grammaticalizing aspect and affectedness" MIT 1987

33 Alexiadou, A., "From NP to DP" John Benjamins 167-188, 2003

34 Folli, R., "Flavors of v. In Aspectual Inquires" Springer 95-120, 2005

35 Harley, H, "External arguments and the Mirror Principle" 125 : 34-57, 2012

36 Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language" MIT Press 2001

37 Grimshaw, J., "Argument Structure" MIT Press 1990

38 Cheng, L., "A small clause analysis of inalienable possession in Mandarin and French" 18 : 65-78, 1987