六堂 崔南善의 ‘少年’과 韓國近代陽明學

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A purpose of this paper is to have made in order to look into the 'boy' which Yukdang Choi, Nam-Seon(1890-1957) emphasized to in viewpoints of the philosophy of Wang Yangming. He criticized an excessive heresy rejection and prosaic scientific trend of Neo-Confucianism and insisted that we gave teachings to be important to thoughts of a boy and new korea a row of the day as it was 'Hsin chi li(心卽理), and 'Chili chi heang(知卽行)' of Wang YangMyeong.
Choi, Nam-Seun just presented '(Jung, 精) Sung(誠)' and (Se, 勢) Ryeok(力)' to thoughts of 'boy'. Firstly, 'Sung(誠)' devoted sincerity, and made that it was a true good. And were atmospheres of an harmony to have been filled with to the universe, and did as soon as it was a life of the universe that it was a place every force going in and out. Drew the south to a person, and were true minds without the badness and falsehood, and did while being so that it was human native purity. At these points can try to think about the 'Dongsim theory(童心說, the child's mind)' which we are of philosophy of Wang Yangming Li Zhi(李贄) of the Ming-dynasty. He got out in all human bindings, and emphasized to the child's mind that was a true mind while emphasizing to free human object anger. And boys can read finally the which required at the veinses of 'Ah(我)' and 'Sung(誠)' Choi, Nam-Seon his having spoken.
Secondly, this to mean the 'Ryeok(力)', SeRyeok(勢力) is which Choi, Nam-Seon emphasized to is practice and effort. Emphasis of practice is the reason that raised the philosophy of Wang Yangming as alternatives of Neo-Confucianism, and be emphasized consistently at magazine 'Boy'. Though he was insisting to acquisition of knowledge regarding new civilization, but this knowledge and deep speculation, a lot of thoughts were inferior to finally one practice, and spoke. There should be a mind of 'Kyunin(堅忍, perseverance)' to practice, and the which was intention for betrayal to be able to certainly go to it was 'Kum(劒)', and necessary, and spoke while being so. When one works, this can achieve a true good. Finally, this means a 'Chihaenghabil(知行合一)' theory of the philosophy of Wang Yangming.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 李建芳, "蘭谷存稿"

2 송하경, "한국양명학의 전개와 특징" 한국양명학회 2 : 1998

3 금장태, "한국 양명학의 쟁점" 서울대학교출판부 2008

4 문성환, "최남선의 에크리튀르와 근대․언어․민족" 한국학술정보 2009

5 류시현, "최남선연구" 역사비평사 2009

6 최재목, "최남선 少年誌의 ‘新大韓의 소년’ 기획에 대하여" 동아시아일본학회 (18) : 249-274, 2006

7 시마다 겐지, "주자학과 양명학" 까치 1986

8 홍원식, "정주학의 거경궁리설 연구" 고려대학교 1991

9 상호, "일제강점기 정인보 실심론의 주체성과 창조적 정신" 충남대 유학연구소 14 : 2006

10 엄석인, "일본에서의 이탁오 사상 영향과 그에 대한 연구 현황" 예문동양사상연구원 16 : 2007

11 김혜경, "이탁오의 철학사상" 예문동양사상연구원 16 : 2007

12 홍원식, "양명학의 지행합일설과 행선지후설" 한국유교학회 8 : 1996

13 정인보, "양명학연론" 한국국학진흥원 2005

14 양국영, "양명학" 예문서원 1994

15 진래, "양명철학" 예문서원 2003

16 이상호, "양명우파와 정제두의 양명학" 혜안 2008

17 홍원식, "애국계몽운동의 철학적 기반" 동양철학연구회 22 : 2000

18 최기숙, "신대한소년'과 '아이들보이'의 문화 생태학" 상허학회 16 : 215-248, 2006

19 조은숙, "근대계몽담론과 ‘소년’의 표상" 민족어문학회 46 : 7-248, 2002

20 전성곤, "근대 ‘조선’의 아이덴티티와 최남선" 제이앤씨 2009

21 한국철학사상연구회, "강좌 한국철학" 예문서원 1995

22 朴殷植, "朴殷植全集"

23 최재목, "日帝强占期 雜誌를 통해서 본 陽明學 硏究의 動向" 동양철학연구회 (55) : 261-303, 2008

24 崔在穆, "崔南善 『少年』誌에 나타난 陽明學 및 近代日本陽明學 - ‘近代韓國陽明學’의 萌芽期？企劃期의 한 양상 -" 일본어문학회 (33) : 509-542, 2006

25 李贄, "≪李贄全集≫[1]" 社會科學文獻出版社 2000

26 고려대 아세아문제연구소, "≪육당 최남선전집≫[1-15]" 현암사 1973

27 풍속문화연구회, "≪육당 최남선전집≫[1-14]" 역락 2003

28 소래섭, "≪소년≫지에 나타난 “소년”의 의미와 “아동”의 발견" 일지사 2002

29 윤세진, "≪소년≫에서 ≪청춘≫까지, 근대적 지식의 스펙터클 in: ,≪소년≫에서 ≪청춘≫의 창≫" 이화여대 출판부 2007

30 王守仁, "≪王陽明全集≫[上․下]" 上海古籍出版社 1995

31 권희영, "20세기 초 잡지 ≪少年≫에 나타난 소년의 정체성" 한국학중앙연구원 31 (31): 363-387, 2008