RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    저작권신탁관리단체의 감독 강화에 관한 소고 - 독일과 프랑스 제도의 시사점을 중심으로 - = Strengthening the Oversight of Copyright Collective Management Organizations: Insights from the German and French Systems

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110182715

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to comparatively analyze the oversight systems of major countries as a legal means to strengthen the public accountability and transparency of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) and to propose legislative improvements for the Korean Copyright Act. Despite the unique characteristics of the Korean collective management market—such as the monopolistic structure centered on large-scale organizations and the restriction of creators' rights to choose through standardized contracts—the current oversight system relies on administrative guidance by government officials and low-efficacy fines, showing clear limitations.
    Accordingly, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the German model, which emphasizes judicial control and internal governance, and the French model, which conducts rigorous financial oversight through an independent body composed of judges and accounting experts. In particular, the French Intellectual Property Code (CPI) and its Permanent Control Commission (CPCCSRD)—equipped with the right to access IT systems, the power to impose turnover-based fines, and criminal penalties for obstructing investigations—offer significant implications for improving the Korean legal framework.
    As a conclusion, this study proposes three directions for amending the Korean Copyright Act: 1) the establishment of an "Independent Oversight Committee" centered on professional judges and financial experts independent of the executive branch; 2) the introduction of "turnover-linked administrative fines" proportional to the scale of violations and a "mandatory public disclosure system" for sanction results; and 3) the legal guarantee of the "right to choose the scope of assignment" to prevent the monopolization of rights by CMOs. Such a paradigm shift will serve as a foundation for substantially protecting creators' interests and ensuring the healthy development of the copyright ecosystem.
    번역하기

    This study aims to comparatively analyze the oversight systems of major countries as a legal means to strengthen the public accountability and transparency of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) and to propose legislative improvements for the K...

    This study aims to comparatively analyze the oversight systems of major countries as a legal means to strengthen the public accountability and transparency of Collective Management Organizations (CMOs) and to propose legislative improvements for the Korean Copyright Act. Despite the unique characteristics of the Korean collective management market—such as the monopolistic structure centered on large-scale organizations and the restriction of creators' rights to choose through standardized contracts—the current oversight system relies on administrative guidance by government officials and low-efficacy fines, showing clear limitations.
    Accordingly, this paper provides an in-depth analysis of the German model, which emphasizes judicial control and internal governance, and the French model, which conducts rigorous financial oversight through an independent body composed of judges and accounting experts. In particular, the French Intellectual Property Code (CPI) and its Permanent Control Commission (CPCCSRD)—equipped with the right to access IT systems, the power to impose turnover-based fines, and criminal penalties for obstructing investigations—offer significant implications for improving the Korean legal framework.
    As a conclusion, this study proposes three directions for amending the Korean Copyright Act: 1) the establishment of an "Independent Oversight Committee" centered on professional judges and financial experts independent of the executive branch; 2) the introduction of "turnover-linked administrative fines" proportional to the scale of violations and a "mandatory public disclosure system" for sanction results; and 3) the legal guarantee of the "right to choose the scope of assignment" to prevent the monopolization of rights by CMOs. Such a paradigm shift will serve as a foundation for substantially protecting creators' interests and ensuring the healthy development of the copyright ecosystem.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼