RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCI SCIE SCOPUS

      Bibliometric and Altmetric Analysis of Retracted Articles on COVID-19

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108017391

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: With greater use of social media platforms for promotions of research articles, retracted articles tend to receive approximately the same attention. We systematically analyzed retracted articles from retractionwatch.com to look at the Altm...

      Background: With greater use of social media platforms for promotions of research articles, retracted articles tend to receive approximately the same attention. We systematically analyzed retracted articles from retractionwatch.com to look at the Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) garnered over a period of time in order to highlight the role of social media and other platforms in advertising retracted articles and its effect on the spread of misinformation.
      Methods: Retractionwatch.com was searched for coronavirus disease 2019 related retracted papers on November 6th, 2021. Articles were excluded based on lack of digital object identifier (DOI), if they were preprint articles, absent AAS, and incomplete AAS of pre retraction, post retraction, or both scores.
      Results: A total of 196 articles were found on the Retraction Watch website of which 189 were retracted papers and 7 were expression of concern (EOC). We then identified 175 articles after excluding those that did not have a DOI and 30 preprint articles were also excluded giving 145 articles. Further exclusion of articles with absent AAS and incomplete AAS resulted in a total of 22 articles.
      Conclusion: Retracted articles receive significant online attention. Twitter and Mendeley were the most popular medium for publicizing retracted articles, therefore more focus should be given by journals and their Twitter accounts to discredit all their retracted articles.
      Preprints should be reconsidered as a whole by journals due to the huge risk they carry in disseminating false information.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Li HO, "YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 : a pandemic of misinformation?" 5 (5): e002604-, 2020

      2 Moylan EC, "Why articles are retracted : a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central" 6 (6): e012047-, 2016

      3 Prieto Curiel R, "Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of antivaccination views" 11 (11): 6626-, 2021

      4 Alsobayel H, "Use of social media for professional development by health care professionals : A crosssectional web-based survey" 2 (2): e15-, 2016

      5 Tang Y, "Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals" 69 (69): 653-664, 2020

      6 BMJ, "Top cited articles"

      7 Kambhampati SB, "Top 50 cited articles on Covid-19 after the first year of the pandemic : a bibliometric analysis" 15 (15): 102140-, 2021

      8 Househ M, "The use of social media in healthcare : organizational, clinical, and patient perspectives" 183 : 244-248, 2013

      9 PLOS, "The role of retractions in correcting the scientific literature - Speaking of Medicine and Health"

      10 Johnson NF, "The online competition between pro-and anti-vaccination views" 582 (582): 230-233, 2020

      1 Li HO, "YouTube as a source of information on COVID-19 : a pandemic of misinformation?" 5 (5): e002604-, 2020

      2 Moylan EC, "Why articles are retracted : a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central" 6 (6): e012047-, 2016

      3 Prieto Curiel R, "Vaccination strategies against COVID-19 and the diffusion of antivaccination views" 11 (11): 6626-, 2021

      4 Alsobayel H, "Use of social media for professional development by health care professionals : A crosssectional web-based survey" 2 (2): e15-, 2016

      5 Tang Y, "Unwrap citation count, Altmetric Attention Score and Mendeley readership status of highly cited articles in the top-tier LIS journals" 69 (69): 653-664, 2020

      6 BMJ, "Top cited articles"

      7 Kambhampati SB, "Top 50 cited articles on Covid-19 after the first year of the pandemic : a bibliometric analysis" 15 (15): 102140-, 2021

      8 Househ M, "The use of social media in healthcare : organizational, clinical, and patient perspectives" 183 : 244-248, 2013

      9 PLOS, "The role of retractions in correcting the scientific literature - Speaking of Medicine and Health"

      10 Johnson NF, "The online competition between pro-and anti-vaccination views" 582 (582): 230-233, 2020

      11 The New York Times, "The most influential spreader of coronavirus misinformation online"

      12 Fraser N, "The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape" 19 (19): e3000959-, 2021

      13 Zimba O, "Social media platforms : a primer for researchers" 59 (59): 68-72, 2021

      14 Dunn AG, "Social media interventions for precision public health : promises and risks" 1 (1): 47-, 2018

      15 Goel A, "Social media in the times of COVID-19" 26 (26): 220-223, 2020

      16 Gaur PS, "Social media for scholarly communication in Central Asia" 1 (1): 152-157, 2020

      17 Zimba O, "Social media for research, education and practice in rheumatology" 40 (40): 183-190, 2020

      18 Ventola CL, "Social media and health care professionals : benefits, risks, and best practices" 39 (39): 491-520, 2014

      19 Retraction Watch, "Retracted coronavirus (COVID-19) papers"

      20 Soltani P, "Retracted COVID-19 articles : a side-effect of the hot race to publication" 125 (125): 819-822, 2020

      21 David CC, "Reliance on Facebook for news and its influence on political engagement" 14 (14): e0212263-, 2019

      22 Haldule S, "Post-publication promotion in rheumatology : a survey focusing on social media" 40 (40): 1865-1872, 2020

      23 Ahmed S, "Perception about social media use by rheumatology journals : survey among the attendees of IRACON 2019" 15 (15): 171-174, 2020

      24 Gasparyan AY, "Monitoring information flow on coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19)" 31 (31): 243-246, 2020

      25 Ganatra Keya ; Gasparyan Armen Yuri ; Gupta Latika, "Modern Health Journalism and the Impact of Social Media" 대한의학회 36 (36): 1-5, 2021

      26 Keller B, "Mind the gap : social media engagement by public health researchers" 16 (16): e8-, 2014

      27 Serghiou S, "Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric" 16 (16): e0248625-, 2021

      28 Khan Hiba ; Gasparyan Armen Yuri ; Gupta Latika, "Lessons Learned from Publicizing and Retracting an Erroneous Hypothesis on the Mumps, Measles, Rubella (MMR) Vaccination with Unethical Implications" 대한의학회 36 (36): 1-5, 2021

      29 Kavadichanda C, "Journal metrics : different from author metrics" 15 (15): 149-154, 2020

      30 Gupta Latika ; Gasparyan Armen Yuri ; Misra Durga Prasanna ; Agarwal Vikas ; Zimba Olena ; Yessirkepov Marlen, "Information and Misinformation on COVID-19: a Cross-Sectional Survey Study" 대한의학회 35 (35): 1-11, 2020

      31 Nature Index, "Google Scholar reveals its most influential papers for 2021"

      32 King A, "Fast news or fake news? The advantages and the pitfalls of rapid publication through pre-print servers during a pandemic" 21 (21): e50817-, 2020

      33 "Eric Topol on Twitter: “Debunking another myth, the mRNA vaccines didn’t just suddenly appear in 2020for covid-19. Many had been tested years previously for other viruses; status as of 4 years ago in this Table, and shown to be safe …”"

      34 Candal-Pedreira C, "Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? A pre-post study" 5 (5): e003719-, 2020

      35 LSE, "Despite concerns, COVID-19 shows how social media has become an essential tool in the democratisation of knowledge"

      36 Kouzy R, "Coronavirus goes viral: quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter" 12 (12): e7255-, 2020

      37 Ecker UK, "Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect" 49 (49): 631-644, 2021

      38 Banerjee D, "COVID-19 as an “Infodemic” in public health: critical role of the social media" 9 : 610623-, 2021

      39 Brüssow H, "COVID-19 : vaccination problems" 23 (23): 2878-2890, 2021

      40 Informa UK Limited, an Informa Group Company, "Author services: how to measure research impact"

      41 Altmetric, "Altmetric Attention Score in context"

      42 Udawatta M, "Age-related differences in social media use in the neurosurgical community : a multi-institutional study" 180 : 97-100, 2019

      43 Teixeira da Silva JA, "Adjusting the use of preprints to accommodate the ‘quality’ factor in response to COVID-19" 16 (16): 477-481, 2021

      44 Journalist’s Resource, "Academic journals, journalists perpetuate misinformation in handling research retractions"

      45 Anderson C, "Academic journal retractions and the COVID-19 pandemic" 12 : 21501327211015592-, 2021

      46 Lentzen MP, "A retrospective analysis of social media posts pertaining to COVID-19 vaccination side effects" 40 (40): 43-51, 2022

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 SCI 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2002-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.48 0.37 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.75 0.691 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼