RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      로렌스와 스피노자: 접점들과 분기점들 = Lawrence and Spinoza: Points of Convergence and of Divergence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106492439

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Spinoza’s anti-Cartesian and monistic viewpoint anticipates, in some important ways, Lawrence’s thoughts on life and art. Their shared emphasis on impersonal and differential power is remarkable, as is the affinity between their insights into the embodied and affective nature of beings and their relationships. Lawrence, however, draws us into problematics that significantly are not addressed by Spinoza. They include: being as an achievement of living beings; the affective quality of truth; and the distinction of feeling and emotion, which is analogous if not identical to that of affect and emotion highlighted by Massumi). A historical perspective is called for when considering this difference. Lawrence’s discourse on feeling implies a critique of sentimentalism, while the philosopher of the 17th century was not in a position to reflect on feeling as ’the carrier of truth’.
      번역하기

      Spinoza’s anti-Cartesian and monistic viewpoint anticipates, in some important ways, Lawrence’s thoughts on life and art. Their shared emphasis on impersonal and differential power is remarkable, as is the affinity between their insights into the ...

      Spinoza’s anti-Cartesian and monistic viewpoint anticipates, in some important ways, Lawrence’s thoughts on life and art. Their shared emphasis on impersonal and differential power is remarkable, as is the affinity between their insights into the embodied and affective nature of beings and their relationships. Lawrence, however, draws us into problematics that significantly are not addressed by Spinoza. They include: being as an achievement of living beings; the affective quality of truth; and the distinction of feeling and emotion, which is analogous if not identical to that of affect and emotion highlighted by Massumi). A historical perspective is called for when considering this difference. Lawrence’s discourse on feeling implies a critique of sentimentalism, while the philosopher of the 17th century was not in a position to reflect on feeling as ’the carrier of truth’.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 라투르, 브루노, "인간․사물․동맹—행위자네트워크 이론과 테크노사이언스" 이음 2010

      2 김성호, "미학에 이르는 길: 스피노자와 예술" 영미문학연구회 (43) : 103-131, 2017

      3 김상민, "물질의 귀환—인류세 담론의 철학적 기초로서의 신유물론" 97 : 55-80, 2019

      4 Michelucci, Stefania, "Writing the Body in D. H. Lawrence: Essays on Language, Representation, and Sexuality" Greenwood 19-30, 2001

      5 Harrison, Andrew, "Writing the Body in D. H. Lawrence: Essays on Language, Representation, and Sexuality" Greenwood 45-54, 2001

      6 Lawrence, D. H., "The Rainbow" Cambridge UP 1989

      7 Lawrence, D. H., "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Vol.2: 1913-1916" Cambridge UP 1916

      8 Schmidt, Andreas, "The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics" Cambridge UP 79-98, 2009

      9 Leys, Ruth, "The Ascent of Affect : Genealogy and Critique" U of Chicago P 2017

      10 Hübner, Karolina, "Sympathy: A History" Oxford UP 146-170, 2015

      1 라투르, 브루노, "인간․사물․동맹—행위자네트워크 이론과 테크노사이언스" 이음 2010

      2 김성호, "미학에 이르는 길: 스피노자와 예술" 영미문학연구회 (43) : 103-131, 2017

      3 김상민, "물질의 귀환—인류세 담론의 철학적 기초로서의 신유물론" 97 : 55-80, 2019

      4 Michelucci, Stefania, "Writing the Body in D. H. Lawrence: Essays on Language, Representation, and Sexuality" Greenwood 19-30, 2001

      5 Harrison, Andrew, "Writing the Body in D. H. Lawrence: Essays on Language, Representation, and Sexuality" Greenwood 45-54, 2001

      6 Lawrence, D. H., "The Rainbow" Cambridge UP 1989

      7 Lawrence, D. H., "The Letters of D. H. Lawrence. Vol.2: 1913-1916" Cambridge UP 1916

      8 Schmidt, Andreas, "The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics" Cambridge UP 79-98, 2009

      9 Leys, Ruth, "The Ascent of Affect : Genealogy and Critique" U of Chicago P 2017

      10 Hübner, Karolina, "Sympathy: A History" Oxford UP 146-170, 2015

      11 Lawrence, D. H., "Study of Thomas Hardy and Other Essays" Cambridge UP 1985

      12 Nadler, Steven, "Spinoza’s Ethics : An Introduction" Cambridge UP 2006

      13 Rocca, Michael Della, "Spinoza" Routledge 2008

      14 Bell, Michael, "Sentimentalism, Ethics and the Culture of Feeling" Palgrave 2000

      15 Lawrence, D. H., "Reflections on the Death of a Porcupine and Other Essays" Cambridge UP 1988

      16 Massumi, Brian, "Parables for the Virtual : Movement, Affect, Sensation" Duke University 2002

      17 Damasio, Antonio, "Looking for Spinoza : Joy, Sorrow, and the Feeling Brain" Harcourt 2003

      18 Lawrence, D. H., "Late Essays and Articles" Cambridge UP 2004

      19 Deleuze, Gilles, "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature" U of Minnesota P 1986

      20 Marinetti, F. T., "Futurism: An Anthology" Yale UP 119-125, 2009

      21 Marinetti, F. T., "Futurism: An Anthology" Yale UP 49-53, 2009

      22 Deleuze, Gilles, "Expressionism in Philosophy: Spinoza" Zone Books 1990

      23 Phelps, Jim, "D. H. Lawrence: New Critical Perspectives and Cultural Translation" Cambridge Scholars Publishing 77-93, 2016

      24 Sargent, M. Elizabeth, "D. H. Lawrence and the Dialogical Principle: ‘Strange Reality of Otherness" 63 (63): 409-436, 2001

      25 Bell, Clive, "Art" Frederick A. Stokes

      26 Deleuze, Gilles, "A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia" U of Minnesota P 1987

      27 Spinoza, Benedict de, "A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works" Princeton UP 1994

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.15 0.15 0.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.18 0.16 0.467 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼