RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      폐 결절 검출을 위한 합성곱 신경망의 성능 개선 = Performance Improvement of Convolutional Neural Network for Pulmonary Nodule Detection

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103845131

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Early detection of the pulmonary nodule is important for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Recently, CT has been used as a screening tool for lung nodule detection. And, it has been reported that computer aided detection(CAD) systems can improve...

      Early detection of the pulmonary nodule is important for diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer. Recently, CT has been used as a screening tool for lung nodule detection. And, it has been reported that computer aided detection(CAD) systems can improve the accuracy of the radiologist in detection nodules on CT scan. The previous study has been proposed a method using Convolutional Neural Network(CNN) in Lung CAD system. But the proposed model has a limitation in accuracy due to its sparse layer structure. Therefore, we propose a Deep Convolutional Neural Network to overcome this limitation. The model proposed in this work is consist of 14 layers including 8 convolutional layers and 4 fully connected layers. The CNN model is trained and tested with 61,404 regions-of-interest (ROIs) patches of lung image including 39,760 nodules and 21,644 non-nodules extracted from the Lung Image Database Consortium(LIDC) dataset. We could obtain the classification accuracy of 91.79% with the CNN model presented in this work. To prevent overfitting, we trained the model with Augmented Dataset and regularization term in the cost function. With L1, L2 regularization at Training process, we obtained 92.39%, 92.52% of accuracy respectively. And we obtained 93.52% with data augmentation. In conclusion, we could obtain the accuracy of 93.75% with L2 Regularization and Data Augmentation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Armato S. G, "The lung image database consortium(LIDC)and image database resource initiative(IDRI) : a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans" 38 (38): 915-931, 2011

      2 Liang M, "Recurrent convolutional neural network for object recognition" 3367-3375, 2015

      3 Awai K, "Pulmonary nodules at chest CT : effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance" 230 (230): 347-352, 2004

      4 Li, W, "Pulmonary nodule classification with deep convolutional neural networks on computed tomography images" 2016

      5 Li Q, "Medical image classification with convolutional neural network" IEEE 844-848, 2014

      6 Karpathy, Andrej, "Lessons learned from manually classifying CIFAR-10"

      7 Graham, Benjamin, "Fractional max-pooling"

      8 Romans Lois E, "Computed tomography for technologists: a comprehensive text" Wolters Kluwer Health 36-, 2010

      1 Armato S. G, "The lung image database consortium(LIDC)and image database resource initiative(IDRI) : a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans" 38 (38): 915-931, 2011

      2 Liang M, "Recurrent convolutional neural network for object recognition" 3367-3375, 2015

      3 Awai K, "Pulmonary nodules at chest CT : effect of computer-aided diagnosis on radiologists’ detection performance" 230 (230): 347-352, 2004

      4 Li, W, "Pulmonary nodule classification with deep convolutional neural networks on computed tomography images" 2016

      5 Li Q, "Medical image classification with convolutional neural network" IEEE 844-848, 2014

      6 Karpathy, Andrej, "Lessons learned from manually classifying CIFAR-10"

      7 Graham, Benjamin, "Fractional max-pooling"

      8 Romans Lois E, "Computed tomography for technologists: a comprehensive text" Wolters Kluwer Health 36-, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-06 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Joural of Biomedical Engineering Research KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.08 0.08 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.11 0.09 0.307 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼