RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    한국 공적개발원조 배분의 이론과 실제 = 아프리카 지역 중점협력국을 중심으로

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper evaluates the performance of South Korea’s ODA focusing on aid allocation criteria. In order for a donor to improve her aid effectiveness, she should develop aid allocation policy based on what recipients want to develop. As tracing back the political, economic and demographic characteristics of those ODA recipients in Africa in particular, this paper investigates from which criteria South Korea has delivered different aid portfolios to those recipients between 2007 and 2012 and how substantially such selection criteria reflect universal values of those UN Millennium Development Goals as a dominant discourse in the field of development assistance as well as practical national interests of South Korea. Our empirical analyses demonstrate that while the total amount of ODA toward African recipients is gradually increasing, the focusing strategy has not been consistently used in selecting priority countries.
    Besides, as the aid flow from EDCF account is increasing in aid portfolio, this trend is expected to impose another financial constraint for aid recipients in combating poverty. It is also observed that the grant aid is allocated to a wide range of sectors with a negligible amount, which indicates that such aid portfolio is less likely to enhance aid effectiveness. This research thus suggests that South Korea needs to establish its own value system and priorities in development assistance in the first place, which will be consistently applied to the official development assistance policy. At the same time, it is strongly encouraged that an optimal strategy of delivering ODA, which will satisfy both the needs of recipient and the aid effectiveness, given the limited size of ODA assets in South Korea.
    번역하기

    This paper evaluates the performance of South Korea’s ODA focusing on aid allocation criteria. In order for a donor to improve her aid effectiveness, she should develop aid allocation policy based on what recipients want to develop. As tracing bac...

    This paper evaluates the performance of South Korea’s ODA focusing on aid allocation criteria. In order for a donor to improve her aid effectiveness, she should develop aid allocation policy based on what recipients want to develop. As tracing back the political, economic and demographic characteristics of those ODA recipients in Africa in particular, this paper investigates from which criteria South Korea has delivered different aid portfolios to those recipients between 2007 and 2012 and how substantially such selection criteria reflect universal values of those UN Millennium Development Goals as a dominant discourse in the field of development assistance as well as practical national interests of South Korea. Our empirical analyses demonstrate that while the total amount of ODA toward African recipients is gradually increasing, the focusing strategy has not been consistently used in selecting priority countries.
    Besides, as the aid flow from EDCF account is increasing in aid portfolio, this trend is expected to impose another financial constraint for aid recipients in combating poverty. It is also observed that the grant aid is allocated to a wide range of sectors with a negligible amount, which indicates that such aid portfolio is less likely to enhance aid effectiveness. This research thus suggests that South Korea needs to establish its own value system and priorities in development assistance in the first place, which will be consistently applied to the official development assistance policy. At the same time, it is strongly encouraged that an optimal strategy of delivering ODA, which will satisfy both the needs of recipient and the aid effectiveness, given the limited size of ODA assets in South Korea.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼