RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Regional Water Quality-Enhancing Policy and Regional Welfare = The Case of the Han River Region,Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105671240

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since pollutants are generated in the production and consumption of commodities, a policy to pursue the better environmental quality through the reduction of pollutants negatively impacts economic activity. This can be considered a social cost of the environmental policy. Conversely, it is also important to recognize that there exists a positive relationship between people`s utility and environmental quality since such utility is largely influenced by environmental quality. An increase in people`s utility is a social benefit of environmental policy. Hence, for an accurate evaluation of environmental policy, resulting social cost and benefit must be simultaneously taken into consideration. However, the problem lies in the measurement of social costs and benefits since the market for the environment is not basically to exist. This paper attempts to specifically evaluate the environmental policy in terms of both social costs and benefits. The decrease in the value-added of a regional economy is considered a social cost while the community`s enhanced utility is considered a social benefit. An environmental sector endogeneized input-output model is constructed for measuring the social costs, whereas the contingent valuation method is employed for measuring the social benefits. Moreover, the paper focuses on the Han River Region which is the main economic region of Korea, and restricts the environmental problem to water pollution for simplicity. The paper aims to demonstrate that the water quality enhancing policy for the Han River Region is welfare-improving as a whole.
    번역하기

    Since pollutants are generated in the production and consumption of commodities, a policy to pursue the better environmental quality through the reduction of pollutants negatively impacts economic activity. This can be considered a social cost of the ...

    Since pollutants are generated in the production and consumption of commodities, a policy to pursue the better environmental quality through the reduction of pollutants negatively impacts economic activity. This can be considered a social cost of the environmental policy. Conversely, it is also important to recognize that there exists a positive relationship between people`s utility and environmental quality since such utility is largely influenced by environmental quality. An increase in people`s utility is a social benefit of environmental policy. Hence, for an accurate evaluation of environmental policy, resulting social cost and benefit must be simultaneously taken into consideration. However, the problem lies in the measurement of social costs and benefits since the market for the environment is not basically to exist. This paper attempts to specifically evaluate the environmental policy in terms of both social costs and benefits. The decrease in the value-added of a regional economy is considered a social cost while the community`s enhanced utility is considered a social benefit. An environmental sector endogeneized input-output model is constructed for measuring the social costs, whereas the contingent valuation method is employed for measuring the social benefits. Moreover, the paper focuses on the Han River Region which is the main economic region of Korea, and restricts the environmental problem to water pollution for simplicity. The paper aims to demonstrate that the water quality enhancing policy for the Han River Region is welfare-improving as a whole.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼