포괄적 차별금지법에 대한 헌법적 평가 = A Constitutional Evaluation of a Bill on Comprehensive Anti-discrimination

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In the 21st National Assembly, a bill on anti-discrimination was submitted on June 29, 2020. The primary legislative purpose of the Anti-discrimination Act(Equality Act) was announced to achieve an equal society in which there is no discrimination among people. In this process, the equality of the sexual minorities, including homosexuals, will be guaranteed “secondarily”. As the works of the Human Rights Commission will expand “eventually”, its powers will grow more and more. However, a close analysis of the grounds of discrimination and the means of remedies prescribed in the bill shows that the primary hidden intention”is to strengthen the legal status of the sexual minorities. And the ultimate ambition is to give the Commission the status of the highest judicial institution on the human rights.
Evaluated from a constitutional perspective, the bill goes against the idea of equality between men and women, and it violates the freedom and liberal rights by applying the idea of equality excessively. In addition, the unclear expression of regulations violates the principle of rule of law. Excessive strengthening the authority of the Commission violates the principle of power separation.
Realization of the idea of equality is an eternal task of human society. Historically, the idea of equality has gradually been realized, creating a clear standard after intense debate among stakeholders in the area of concrete discrimination. Therefore, various anti-discrimination laws are made in many fields of our society.
Therefore, it is sufficient to enact a non-discrimination law that individually defines the reasons and areas for non-discrimination, based on the national consensus in Korean society. In addition, if there are some points to be complemented in the current anti-discrimination acts, it is desirable to amend them rationally.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조규범, "혐오표현(Hate Speech) 규제의 국제적 동향과 입법과제" 국회입법조사처 2017

2 김학성, "헌법학원론" 피엔씨미디어 2014

3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

4 김철수, "헌법학신론" 박영사 2009

5 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2015

6 정영화, "헌법" 일조사 2011

7 최대권, "한동대의 월권인가 인권위의 월권인가?, 성매매, 다자성애, 동성애를 인권이라 할 수 있나?" 2019

8 허 영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2015

9 음선필, "포괄적 차별금지법에 대한 반론" 한국교회법학회 7 (7): 106-155, 2020

10 국가인권위원회 차별판단지침연구 태스크포스, "차별판단지침" 국가인권위원회 2008

11 김영한, "젠더주의 도전과 기독교 신앙" 두란도 2018

12 음선필, "젠더전환수술과 성별 변경" 법학연구소 21 (21): 153-189, 2020

13 전윤성, "젠더에 따른 화장실 사용을 허용한 휴스턴시 평등권조례" (1) : 2018

14 전윤성, "젠더(gender)교육의 위험성" 2018

15 이숙진, "젠더(gender) 관련 차별금지 입법 연구" 국회입법조사처 2010

16 현숙경, "젠더 이론 비판 및 올바른 방향성 제시, 성교육이 미쳤다 -젠더 정책의 실체-" 2020

17 Jonathan Verschuuren, "입법의 영향" 한국법제연구원 2011

18 머니투데이, "인권위, 男女말고 '제3의성'도 인정…성소수자 포용"

19 최대권, "왜곡된 혐오차별과 인권기본법의 문제점과 폐해" 밝은생각 2020

20 명재진, "왜곡된 혐오차별과 인권기본법의 문제점과 폐해" 밝은생각 2020

21 서울경제, "엄마․아빠 → 부모 1․2 …프랑스, 학교 서류 용어 대체 움직임"

22 박기주, "성전환자의 성별기준에 관한 입법적 과제" 국회입법조사처 5 (5): 137-164, 2013

23 이상현, "성적지향을 포함한 차별금지법안에 대한 비판적 접근: 영미법제 연구를 중심으로" 법학연구소 39 : 161-194, 2017

24 마이클 브라운, "성공할 수 없는 동성애 혁명" 쿰란출판사 2017

25 지영준, "생명과 성 I" 킹덤북스 2020

26 정소영, "미국은 어떻게 동성결혼을 받아들였나" 도서출판 렉스 2016

27 국가인권위원회, "모두를 위한 평등 향해 담대한 걸음 내디딜 때"

28 음선필, "동성애와 인권" 한국교회법학회 6 (6): 142-173, 2020

29 바른성문화를위한국민연합, "동성애에 대한 불편한 진실" 밝은생각 2013

30 최대권, "동성애․동성결혼과 헌법개정" CLC 2017

31 음선필, "동성애·동성혼의 헌법적 수용에 대한 비판" 법학연구소 18 (18): 89-119, 2017

32 조영길, "동성애 차별금지법에 대한 교회의 복음적 대응" 밝은생각 2020

33 이상원, "동성애 문제에 대한 교육 지침 에 대한 기독교윤리적 평가, 동성애 퀴어 신학의 이단 규명과 장신대 교육지침에 대한 평가" 2018

34 임완기, "동성애 과연 타고 나는 것일까?" 라온누리 2014

35 백상현, "동성애 is" 미래사 2016

36 김지연, "덮으려는 자 펼치려는 자" 도서출판 사람 2019

37 가브리엘 쿠비, "글로벌 성혁명" 밝은생각 2018

38 이상현, "군형법상 항문성교 기타 추행죄 연구: 법제사, 법익론 및 판례 비교를 중심으로" 법학연구소 36 : 249-287, 2016

39 조영길, "국가인권위원회법상 차별금지사유 성적 지향 삭제 개정의 정당성" 미래사 2016

40 국가인권위원회, "국가인권위원회 결정례집 2018 제11집" 국가인권위원회 2019

41 백상현, "가짜 인권, 가짜 혐오, 가짜 소수자" 밝은생각 2017

42 黃道洙, "憲法裁判의 審査基準으로서의 平等" 서울大學校 大學院 1996

43 민성길, "“탈동성애자의 인권에 대한 국가의 역할”에 대한 토론문" 2015

44 음선필, "“욕야카르타 원칙”에 대한 비판적 고찰" 법학연구소 20 (20): 119-154, 2019

45 "https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/cchr/downloads/pdf/publications/GenderID_Card2015.pdf"

46 "https://www.lifesitenews.com/ news/throuple-advocate-for-threesome-marriage-parenting"

47 "https://www.christianpost.com/news/new-york-city-legalizes-third-gender-x-birth-certificates-mayor-signs-bill-227905"

48 "https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-kent-51759203"

49 "https://transrespect.org/en/map/pathologization-requirement/?submap=more-than-two-genderoptions"

50 "https://n.news.naver.com/article/032/0002996519"

51 "https://humanism.org.uk/campaigns/human-rights-and-equality/conversion-therapy"

52 "http://www.mediatoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=201888"

53 Center for Family and Human Rights, "Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity at the United Nations -A brief guide to sexual orientation and gender identity in international law and policy-, C-Fam FACTSHEET" Center for Family and Human Rights 2015

54 Christian Legal Society, "Religious Schools & Colleges Guidance for Same-Sex Issues" Christian Legal Society 2015

55 NYC Commission on Human Rights, "NYC Commission on Human Rights Legal Enforcement Guidance on Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Expression: Local Law No. 3"

56 NYC Commission on Human Rights, "N.Y.C. Admin. Code § 8-102"

57 Peter Sprigg, "LGBT 'equality' laws lose their foundation: Evidence shows sexual orientation can change" Family Research Council

58 UK Crown Prosecution Service, "Homophobic, Biphobic and Transphobic Hate Crime - Prosecution Guidance" UK Crown Prosecution Service 2018

59 Hannah Corcoran, "Hate Crime, England and Wales, 2015/16" Home Office 2016

60 Christian Legal Centre, "Guide to the Equality Act 2010 -Employing Christians under the Equality Act-" Christian Legal Centre 2010

61 Christian Concern, "Gospel Freedom -Christian faith and its place in public life-" Christian Concern 2015

62 Christian Concern, "Freedom of Speech -Street Evangelism-" Christian Concern 2012

63 Pius Nkonzo Langa, "Equality Provisions of the South African Constitution" 54 : 2101-, 2001

64 UK Government, "Equality Act 2010 Explanatory Notes" The National Archives 2010

65 Austin Ruse, "Editorial: Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity are Not Human Rights" Center for Family and Human Rights

66 LifeSite News, "Christian street preachers arrested, fined for ‘challenging Muslims’, ‘homophobia’"

67 Family Research Council, "Bathroom Incidents, Issue Brief" Family Research Council 2017