RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    교육정책원리로서 교정적 평등의 의미와 한계 = The Idea of Equality and its Application for the Retributive Principle in Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A5092702

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper has focused on the problem as to whether the retributive principles as an applicable principle of equality can actually contribute to the realization of the egalitarian ideal and to the equalization policy in education. To dissolve the inequalities, the settlement of unlimited opportunities and the principle of redress have been taken into account. Concerning the latter, the Rawlsian maximin principle has been minutely examined. And then we have found out its pitfall that there are possibilities to restrict the liberty of each individual and also to bring about tyranny, as a consequence from seeking to satisfy retribution only. The positive retribution has a room to be adopted rather than negative one, but it also has difficulties the same as ones of the equalized policies the left egalitarians assert. Just as effective freedom can be achieved when understood as formal freedom, effective equality for the egalitarian plateau would be even realized in the light of equal opportunity principle as well as the liberal idea of competition. In this context, the retributive problems in the Korean educational system have been examined as follows: High school Equalization Policy(HEP), the so-called 3 Prohibition Policies in University Entrance Exam System, State Monopoly in Curriculum and Teacher Education, State Control on Private School and so on. These are designated for the retributive devices under the egalitarian ideal but worsen even solid basis for equality in direct opposition so that Korean Education may be faced with the danger to weaken the power of education. In the Hayekian tone, the problem of equality necessitates spontaneous order rather than artificial order that can rationalize state intervention under the illusion of social justice. Thus the focus in equal education should be placed on the equal opportunity and individual differences as well as personal choice under the process of natural selection.
    번역하기

    This paper has focused on the problem as to whether the retributive principles as an applicable principle of equality can actually contribute to the realization of the egalitarian ideal and to the equalization policy in education. To dissolve the ineq...

    This paper has focused on the problem as to whether the retributive principles as an applicable principle of equality can actually contribute to the realization of the egalitarian ideal and to the equalization policy in education. To dissolve the inequalities, the settlement of unlimited opportunities and the principle of redress have been taken into account. Concerning the latter, the Rawlsian maximin principle has been minutely examined. And then we have found out its pitfall that there are possibilities to restrict the liberty of each individual and also to bring about tyranny, as a consequence from seeking to satisfy retribution only. The positive retribution has a room to be adopted rather than negative one, but it also has difficulties the same as ones of the equalized policies the left egalitarians assert. Just as effective freedom can be achieved when understood as formal freedom, effective equality for the egalitarian plateau would be even realized in the light of equal opportunity principle as well as the liberal idea of competition. In this context, the retributive problems in the Korean educational system have been examined as follows: High school Equalization Policy(HEP), the so-called 3 Prohibition Policies in University Entrance Exam System, State Monopoly in Curriculum and Teacher Education, State Control on Private School and so on. These are designated for the retributive devices under the egalitarian ideal but worsen even solid basis for equality in direct opposition so that Korean Education may be faced with the danger to weaken the power of education. In the Hayekian tone, the problem of equality necessitates spontaneous order rather than artificial order that can rationalize state intervention under the illusion of social justice. Thus the focus in equal education should be placed on the equal opportunity and individual differences as well as personal choice under the process of natural selection.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국의 평등주의 그 마음의 습관" 삼성경제연구소 2006

    2 "한국의 사립대학교" 자유기업원 1997

    3 "평등 이념과 그 적용원리(Ⅰ): 교육기회균등의 원리" 한국교육개발원 31 (31): 2004a

    4 "평등 이념과 그 적용원리 교육분배의 원리" 한국교육개발원 31 (31): 2004b

    5 "조심스러운 낙관" 자유기업원 2005b

    6 "정의로운 체제로서의 자본주의" 삼성경제연구소 2005a

    7 "자유주의와 시장경제" 위즈비즈 2003

    8 "자유와 자유교육" 아시아태평양교육발전연구단 4 (4): 2003

    9 "앙시앵 레짐과 프랑스 혁명" 박영률출판사 2006

    10 "시장경제의 법과 질서" 자유기업원 1997

    1 "한국의 평등주의 그 마음의 습관" 삼성경제연구소 2006

    2 "한국의 사립대학교" 자유기업원 1997

    3 "평등 이념과 그 적용원리(Ⅰ): 교육기회균등의 원리" 한국교육개발원 31 (31): 2004a

    4 "평등 이념과 그 적용원리 교육분배의 원리" 한국교육개발원 31 (31): 2004b

    5 "조심스러운 낙관" 자유기업원 2005b

    6 "정의로운 체제로서의 자본주의" 삼성경제연구소 2005a

    7 "자유주의와 시장경제" 위즈비즈 2003

    8 "자유와 자유교육" 아시아태평양교육발전연구단 4 (4): 2003

    9 "앙시앵 레짐과 프랑스 혁명" 박영률출판사 2006

    10 "시장경제의 법과 질서" 자유기업원 1997

    11 "선택이 가능한 교육제도" (82) : 2006

    12 "법, 입법 그리고 자유 Ⅱ" 자유기업원 1998

    13 "The Idea of Equality" Basil Blackwell 1962

    14 "The Essential Drucker on Society Ⅲ" 청림출판 2000

    15 "Schools of Thought" Faber and Faber 1977

    16 "Problems in Primary Education" Routledge 1976

    17 "Political Philosophy" Polity 2001

    18 "Four Essays on Liberty" Oxford University Press 1969

    19 "Competition as a Discovery Procedure The Essence of Hayek" Hoover Institute Press 1984

    20 "A Theory of Justice" Harvard University Press 1971

    21 "2002 자유주의 정당의 정책" 자유기업원 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.84 1.84 1.82
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.82 1.8 2.264 0.23
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼