임플란트 고정성 보철물 수복을 위한 최소 교합 고경에 대한 고찰 = Consideration of Minimal Interocclusal Distance for Implant-supported Prosthesis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Background: The purpose of this review is to exmanine the minimal interocclusal distance required for implant placement for each implant manufacturer without surgery.
Materials and methods: “Minimal interocclusal distance” was defined as the distance from the edentulous alveolar crest to the functional cusp of the opposing teeth or to the contact surface facing the central fossa of implant prosthesis. 15 journals were searched by “Pubmed”, and specifications were inquired by manufacturer.
Result: Implants were classified into bone level and soft-tissue level implant. The bone level was divided into external connection type and internal connection type. Implants were categorized into cement-retention type and screw-retention type according to the fastening method of the prosthesis. For the cement-retention type, the bone level implant required 6 mm interocclusal distance and the soft-tissue level implant 8 mm, regardless of manufacturer. For the screw- retention type, minimal interocclusal distance were 1.5~4.5 mm for internal connection type, 3.65~4.5 mm for external connection type, 4.3~6.5 mm soft-tissue level implant.
Conclusion: There were differences in each manufacturer, but implantation can be performed when the minimum interocclusal distance of 1.5 mm is secured.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Petridis HP, "Three-dimensional positional changes of teeth adjacent to posterior edentulous spaces in relation to age at time of tooth loss and elapsed time" 18 : 78-83, 2010

2 Tarnow DP, "The effect of inter-implant distance on the height of inter-implant bone crest" 71 : 546-549, 2000

3 Shugars DA, "The consequences of not replacing a missing posterior tooth" 131 : 1317-1323, 2000

4 Meningaud JP, "Posterior maxillary segmental osteotomy for mandibular implants placement: case report" 102 : e1-e3, 2006

5 Craddock HL., "Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 3. A study of clinical parameters associated with the presence of occlusal interferences following posterior tooth loss" 17 : 25-30, 2008

6 Craddock HL, "Occlusal changes following posterior tooth loss in adults. Part 1: a study of clinical parameters associated with the extent and type of supraeruption in unopposed posterior teeth" 16 : 485-494, 2007

7 Lee HE, "Interdisciplinary management of unfavorable posterior intermaxillary space" 46 : 413-415, 2008

8 Misch CE, "Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 2" 15 : 113-121, 2006

9 Misch CE, "Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1" 14 : 312-318, 2005

10 McGarry TJ, "Classification system for partial edentulism" 11 : 181-193, 2002

11 Cochran DL, "Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible" 68 : 186-198, 1997

12 Linkevicius T, "Biologic width around implants. An evidence-based review" 10 : 27-35, 2008

13 Giglio GD., "Abutment selection in implant-supported fixed prosthodontics" 19 : 233-241, 1999

14 Karunagaran S, "A systematic approach to definitive planning and designing single and multiple unit implant abutments" 23 : 639-648, 2014

15 Craddock HL, "A study of the incidence of overeruption and occlusal interferences in unopposed posterior teeth" 196 : 341-348, 2004