RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      구강 내 사진과 치아 모형 스캔을 이용한 교정 발치 패턴 예측에서의 인공지능 정확도

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110096025

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence model in predicting orthodontic extraction patterns using intraoral photographs and dental model scans. Methods: Orthodontic treatment plans and pre-treatment patient data, intra-oral (IO) images and 300 right-side digital scans of pre-treatment gypsum model casts, were collected from patients who had completed orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics. Data set consisted of 150 extraction cases and 150 non-extraction cases, divided into 85% training and 15% test set for AI models. Model performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. Results: The AI model trained with IO images at level 2 showed 65.90% accuracy, 66.80% precision, 65.90% recall, and 66.30% F1 score. In addition, the AI model trained with the digital scans at level 1 showed 61.63% accuracy, 61.60% precision, 61.40% recall, and 61.50% F1 score. At level 2, the digital scan model showed 61.18% accuracy, 68.30% precision, 68.20% recall, and 68.20% F1 score. Moreover, the AI model trained with the digital scans at level 3 showed 43.18% accuracy, 41.80% precision, 43.20% recall, and 42.50% F1 score. Among the tested models, the AI model trained with the digital scan level 2 showed the highest scores. Conclusions: These findings indicate the potential utility of an artificial intelligence model in supporting extraction decision-making in orthodontic treatment based on intraoral photographs or digital model scans.
      번역하기

      Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence model in predicting orthodontic extraction patterns using intraoral photographs and dental model scans. Methods: Orthodontic treatment plans and pre-treatment patien...

      Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of an artificial intelligence model in predicting orthodontic extraction patterns using intraoral photographs and dental model scans. Methods: Orthodontic treatment plans and pre-treatment patient data, intra-oral (IO) images and 300 right-side digital scans of pre-treatment gypsum model casts, were collected from patients who had completed orthodontic treatment at the Department of Orthodontics. Data set consisted of 150 extraction cases and 150 non-extraction cases, divided into 85% training and 15% test set for AI models. Model performance was evaluated by accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 scores. Results: The AI model trained with IO images at level 2 showed 65.90% accuracy, 66.80% precision, 65.90% recall, and 66.30% F1 score. In addition, the AI model trained with the digital scans at level 1 showed 61.63% accuracy, 61.60% precision, 61.40% recall, and 61.50% F1 score. At level 2, the digital scan model showed 61.18% accuracy, 68.30% precision, 68.20% recall, and 68.20% F1 score. Moreover, the AI model trained with the digital scans at level 3 showed 43.18% accuracy, 41.80% precision, 43.20% recall, and 42.50% F1 score. Among the tested models, the AI model trained with the digital scan level 2 showed the highest scores. Conclusions: These findings indicate the potential utility of an artificial intelligence model in supporting extraction decision-making in orthodontic treatment based on intraoral photographs or digital model scans.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼