The aim of this paper is to critically examine the formation of the state institutions in Japan through Yong-Duck Jung’s “The State Apparatus in Korea and Japan”(2002, Daeyoung Munhwa Publishing Press). Prof. Jung analyzed that the two state’s...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40118717
2003
-
300
KCI우수등재
학술저널
1-19(19쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The aim of this paper is to critically examine the formation of the state institutions in Japan through Yong-Duck Jung’s “The State Apparatus in Korea and Japan”(2002, Daeyoung Munhwa Publishing Press). Prof. Jung analyzed that the two state’s...
The aim of this paper is to critically examine the formation of the state institutions in Japan through Yong-Duck Jung’s “The State Apparatus in Korea and Japan”(2002, Daeyoung Munhwa Publishing Press). Prof. Jung analyzed that the two state’s institutions in Korea and Japan are commonly based on Pluralism, Individualism, Elitism and Capitalism. However, this paper emphasizes that Japanese government’s apparatus are based on the Bureau-superior Model beyond 4 theories through historical approach. Therefore, the issue of Japan state apparatus should be emphasized further since individual state not only globally tend to accompany with other countries but also tend to overcome their political change, political culture, economic conditions, etc.. Especially we should not forget the characteristics of the state apparatus in Japan remaining in spite of World War Ⅱ. This result indicates that the Bureau-superior Model on the formation of the state apparatus in Japan is more comprehensive in explaining Japan government’s system.
시간길이와 부처조직운영에 관한 연구: 정통부와 농림부의 비교
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 평가예정 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2015-01-01 | 평가 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.97 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.98 | 2.13 | 2.164 | 0.32 |