RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    시민의 경찰협력의사에 관한 연구 = Public Cooperation with the Police: A Multilevel Analysis

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17548791

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In modern society, transnational crimes have increasingly posed substantial threats to public safety, generating significant social and economic costs. Police agencies have intensified their efforts to prevent such crimes and protect citizens, yet relying solely on traditional law enforcement mechanisms has proven insufficient. Recognizing these limitations, the national police agency has adopted a community policing paradigm, which emphasizes proactive citizen cooperation with the police to prevent crime collaboratively. Despite this strategic shift, research and practice indicate that citizens’ willingness to participate in police activities, as well as their actual engagement, remain remarkably low, limiting the effectiveness of community policing initiatives. Understanding the factors that influence public cooperation with the police is therefore critical for designing effective interventions and enhancing social order.
    This study employs a multilevel analytical approach to examine the determinants of public cooperation with the police, considering both individual-level and neighborhood-level social capital. Individual-level data were collected through a survey of 1,000 adults aged 18 and older residing across 50 autonomous districts in the metropolitan area. Social capital at the individual-level was operationalized through survey items capturing police trust, adherence to social norms such as the obligation to obey the law and the police, and collective efficacy within local communities. At the neighborhood-level, social capital variables were derived from government open data sources, including social surveys and community indicators. This hierarchical analysis allows for the simultaneous consideration of individual-level and neighborhood-level factors, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the social contexts influencing public cooperation with the police.
    The multilevel analysis revealed that individual-level social capital exerts a significant influence on citizens’ willingness to cooperate with the police and their reported cooperation in police-related activities. In contrast, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was very low, indicating that variation between neighborhoods is minimal. When neighborhood-level variables were incorporated into the model, significant effects were observed for only some neighborhood-level independent variables on willingness to report crimes, suggesting that neighborhood-level social capital may play a limited role. Overall, these findings imply that interventions aiming to increase public cooperation should prioritize enhancing social capital at the individual-level, such as fostering trust, reinforcing normative expectations, and strengthening social networks, rather than focusing primarily on neighborhood-level initiatives.
    The practical implications of this study are clear: police stations and community organizations should design policies and programs that increase direct contact with residents, promote community engagement, and cultivate individual-level social capital. Such approaches are likely to enhance the effectiveness of community policing strategies, contributing to safer and more cohesive communities.
    번역하기

    In modern society, transnational crimes have increasingly posed substantial threats to public safety, generating significant social and economic costs. Police agencies have intensified their efforts to prevent such crimes and protect citizens, yet rel...

    In modern society, transnational crimes have increasingly posed substantial threats to public safety, generating significant social and economic costs. Police agencies have intensified their efforts to prevent such crimes and protect citizens, yet relying solely on traditional law enforcement mechanisms has proven insufficient. Recognizing these limitations, the national police agency has adopted a community policing paradigm, which emphasizes proactive citizen cooperation with the police to prevent crime collaboratively. Despite this strategic shift, research and practice indicate that citizens’ willingness to participate in police activities, as well as their actual engagement, remain remarkably low, limiting the effectiveness of community policing initiatives. Understanding the factors that influence public cooperation with the police is therefore critical for designing effective interventions and enhancing social order.
    This study employs a multilevel analytical approach to examine the determinants of public cooperation with the police, considering both individual-level and neighborhood-level social capital. Individual-level data were collected through a survey of 1,000 adults aged 18 and older residing across 50 autonomous districts in the metropolitan area. Social capital at the individual-level was operationalized through survey items capturing police trust, adherence to social norms such as the obligation to obey the law and the police, and collective efficacy within local communities. At the neighborhood-level, social capital variables were derived from government open data sources, including social surveys and community indicators. This hierarchical analysis allows for the simultaneous consideration of individual-level and neighborhood-level factors, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the social contexts influencing public cooperation with the police.
    The multilevel analysis revealed that individual-level social capital exerts a significant influence on citizens’ willingness to cooperate with the police and their reported cooperation in police-related activities. In contrast, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was very low, indicating that variation between neighborhoods is minimal. When neighborhood-level variables were incorporated into the model, significant effects were observed for only some neighborhood-level independent variables on willingness to report crimes, suggesting that neighborhood-level social capital may play a limited role. Overall, these findings imply that interventions aiming to increase public cooperation should prioritize enhancing social capital at the individual-level, such as fostering trust, reinforcing normative expectations, and strengthening social networks, rather than focusing primarily on neighborhood-level initiatives.
    The practical implications of this study are clear: police stations and community organizations should design policies and programs that increase direct contact with residents, promote community engagement, and cultivate individual-level social capital. Such approaches are likely to enhance the effectiveness of community policing strategies, contributing to safer and more cohesive communities.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 5
    • 1. 연구의 범위 5
    • 2. 연구의 방법 6
    • 제1장 서 론 1
    • 제1절 연구의 목적 1
    • 제2절 연구의 범위 및 방법 5
    • 1. 연구의 범위 5
    • 2. 연구의 방법 6
    • 제2장 이론적 배경 9
    • 제1절 경찰협력의사의 의의와 유형 9
    • 1. 경찰협력의사의 의의 9
    • 2. 경찰협력의사의 유형 11
    • 제2절 사회자본 이론 17
    • 1. 사회자본의 의의 17
    • 2. 경찰신뢰 22
    • 3. 준수의무감 26
    • 4. 집합효율성 33
    • 제3절 선행연구 검토 38
    • 1. 개인 수준 변수와 경찰협력의사 39
    • 2. 지역 수준 변수와 경찰협력의사 43
    • 제3장 연구의 설계 47
    • 제1절 연구모형 및 연구가설 47
    • 1. 연구모형 47
    • 2. 연구문제와 연구가설 48
    • 제2절 변수의 조작적 정의와 측정 51
    • 1. 변수의 조작적 정의 51
    • 2. 변수의 측정 54
    • 제3절 자료수집과 분석방법 69
    • 1. 자료수집 69
    • 2. 분석방법 72
    • 제4장 연구결과 77
    • 제1절 주요 변수의 특성 77
    • 1. 인구사회학적 특성 77
    • 2. 개인 수준 특성 78
    • 3. 지역 수준 특성 79
    • 제2절 주요 변수의 상관분석 82
    • 1. 개인 수준의 상관분석 82
    • 2. 지역 수준의 상관분석 85
    • 제3절 위계적 회귀분석 87
    • 1. 참여의사 87
    • 2. 범죄신고의사 89
    • 제4절 다층모형 91
    • 1. 기초모형 91
    • 2. 통제모형 94
    • 3. 연구모형: 개인 수준 96
    • 4. 연구모형: 지역 수준 100
    • 제5장 결론 105
    • 참 고 문 헌 112
    • Abstract 134
    • 부 록 137
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼