RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      RFID 시스템과 증명책임 전환에 의한 개인정보 보호 = The RFID System and Protection of personal Information related to the Conversion of Evidence Burden

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76500754

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology is increasingly being deployed for a variety of purposes. While there are situations in which this technology can have positive and benign effects, there are also potential privacy implications. RFID tags are so far primarily used to identify and manage objects (products) to control the supply chain or to protect the authenticity of the product brand; however, they could be linked with personal information such as credit card details and even used to collect such information, or to locate or profile persons possessing tagged objects. This technology could allow for the tracing of individuals and for linking collected information with existing databases.
      Radio-frequency identification tags (RFID tags) are currently being tested and increasingly being used as a more advanced form and possible replacement of bar codes (“smart labels”). The size of these microchips is about 1/3 of a millimetre (and smaller – “smart dust”). Most of them operate as passive transponders (without batteries) by listening to radio signals sent by transceivers (RFID readers) and using the energy of the received radio signal to reflect and answer it. Active RFIDs have a greater range (depending on the readers used). Since prices for RFID microchips and readers are dropping their widespread deployment becomes increasingly economically viable. RFID tags are likely to become essential drivers of ubiquitous (or pervasive) computing. Due to their storage and capacity for interactive communication they are far more powerful than bar codes. In addition they provide for unique identification of each tagged unit whereas bar codes are identical for every unit of the same product.
      However personal data can be processed and transmitted or read with the help of RFIDs or at least such object-related information can easily be linked with personal information (e.g. when a credit card is used for buying the tagged item). RFID tags have the potential of tracking the movements of a person who possesses or handles tagged objects.
      Many technology experts predict the development of a seamless network of millions of RFID receivers strategically placed around the globe in airports, seaports, highways, distribution centers, warehouses, retail stores, and consumers' homes, all of which are constantly reading, processing, and evaluating consumers behaviors and purchases. In addition to undermining a consumer's ability to enjoy a lifestyle in relative anonymity, critics of the technology counter that the information gathered by RFID readers could be obtained by the government for surveillance or monitoring the activities of citizens, or even misused by hackers and criminals. Even more, the ever-expanding use of RFID chips would leave no aspect of life safe from the prying eyes of retail and corporate giants. Chips integrated into commonplace products such as floor tiles, shelf paper, cabinets, appliance, exercise equipment, and grocery and packaged products would allow even our most intimate activities to be monitored.
      It is studied in this paper how consumer using RFID tags should be protected from the businessmen, enterprise or industrialist who are seeking profit in the field of RFID technology: The special attention is paid with a view to the protective way of consumer related to the conversion of proof responsibility in the civil procedure.
      번역하기

      Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology is increasingly being deployed for a variety of purposes. While there are situations in which this technology can have positive and benign effects, there are also potential privacy implications. RFID ...

      Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology is increasingly being deployed for a variety of purposes. While there are situations in which this technology can have positive and benign effects, there are also potential privacy implications. RFID tags are so far primarily used to identify and manage objects (products) to control the supply chain or to protect the authenticity of the product brand; however, they could be linked with personal information such as credit card details and even used to collect such information, or to locate or profile persons possessing tagged objects. This technology could allow for the tracing of individuals and for linking collected information with existing databases.
      Radio-frequency identification tags (RFID tags) are currently being tested and increasingly being used as a more advanced form and possible replacement of bar codes (“smart labels”). The size of these microchips is about 1/3 of a millimetre (and smaller – “smart dust”). Most of them operate as passive transponders (without batteries) by listening to radio signals sent by transceivers (RFID readers) and using the energy of the received radio signal to reflect and answer it. Active RFIDs have a greater range (depending on the readers used). Since prices for RFID microchips and readers are dropping their widespread deployment becomes increasingly economically viable. RFID tags are likely to become essential drivers of ubiquitous (or pervasive) computing. Due to their storage and capacity for interactive communication they are far more powerful than bar codes. In addition they provide for unique identification of each tagged unit whereas bar codes are identical for every unit of the same product.
      However personal data can be processed and transmitted or read with the help of RFIDs or at least such object-related information can easily be linked with personal information (e.g. when a credit card is used for buying the tagged item). RFID tags have the potential of tracking the movements of a person who possesses or handles tagged objects.
      Many technology experts predict the development of a seamless network of millions of RFID receivers strategically placed around the globe in airports, seaports, highways, distribution centers, warehouses, retail stores, and consumers' homes, all of which are constantly reading, processing, and evaluating consumers behaviors and purchases. In addition to undermining a consumer's ability to enjoy a lifestyle in relative anonymity, critics of the technology counter that the information gathered by RFID readers could be obtained by the government for surveillance or monitoring the activities of citizens, or even misused by hackers and criminals. Even more, the ever-expanding use of RFID chips would leave no aspect of life safe from the prying eyes of retail and corporate giants. Chips integrated into commonplace products such as floor tiles, shelf paper, cabinets, appliance, exercise equipment, and grocery and packaged products would allow even our most intimate activities to be monitored.
      It is studied in this paper how consumer using RFID tags should be protected from the businessmen, enterprise or industrialist who are seeking profit in the field of RFID technology: The special attention is paid with a view to the protective way of consumer related to the conversion of proof responsibility in the civil procedure.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 인터넷과 RFID 시스템의 비교·검토
      • Ⅲ. RFID 활용실태와 범위의 확대
      • Ⅳ. RFID의 프라이버시 침해가능성과 가이드라인
      • Ⅴ. 개인정보의 침해에 관한 주요유형과 증명책임의 전환
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
      • Ⅱ. 인터넷과 RFID 시스템의 비교·검토
      • Ⅲ. RFID 활용실태와 범위의 확대
      • Ⅳ. RFID의 프라이버시 침해가능성과 가이드라인
      • Ⅴ. 개인정보의 침해에 관한 주요유형과 증명책임의 전환
      • Ⅵ. 개인정보 제공에 대한 철회와 증명책임
      • Ⅶ. 나가는 말
      • 참고 문헌
      • Abstract
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한국경제, "흉악범에도 `전자발찌` 채운다…살인·방화·유괴 등 최장 10년"

      2 ZD Net Korea 뉴스, "환자, 의사 모두 RFID 칩 이식을 꺼린다"

      3 구제군, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구:국회에서의 입법논의와 관련하여"

      4 부산일보, "자녀 등교했습니다"

      5 노컷뉴스, "인천서 전자팔찌 부착 법원 판결"

      6 유승화, "유비쿼터스 사회의 RFID" 전자신문사 2007

      7 헤럴드경제 메트로, "애완견 전자명찰 의무화 미부착땐 과태료 20만원"

      8 한국정보보호진흥원, "암호이용기반구축 보고서"

      9 이시윤, "신민사소송법(제5판)" 박영사 2009

      10 광주드림, "손수건에서 전자명찰까지"

      1 한국경제, "흉악범에도 `전자발찌` 채운다…살인·방화·유괴 등 최장 10년"

      2 ZD Net Korea 뉴스, "환자, 의사 모두 RFID 칩 이식을 꺼린다"

      3 구제군, "퍼블리시티권에 관한 연구:국회에서의 입법논의와 관련하여"

      4 부산일보, "자녀 등교했습니다"

      5 노컷뉴스, "인천서 전자팔찌 부착 법원 판결"

      6 유승화, "유비쿼터스 사회의 RFID" 전자신문사 2007

      7 헤럴드경제 메트로, "애완견 전자명찰 의무화 미부착땐 과태료 20만원"

      8 한국정보보호진흥원, "암호이용기반구축 보고서"

      9 이시윤, "신민사소송법(제5판)" 박영사 2009

      10 광주드림, "손수건에서 전자명찰까지"

      11 Joins 뉴스, "서울시, 애완견 전자명찰 안 달면 과태료 20만원"

      12 NAVER 특허, "생체칩을 이용한 차량제어장치"

      13 한국경제, "바코드 인간"

      14 한충수, "민사소송법의 이론과 실무" 홍문사 2006

      15 전병서, "민사소송법강의(제4판)" 법문사 2002

      16 양병회, "민사소송법강의(제3판)" 삼지사 2007

      17 김홍규, "민사소송법(제8판)" 삼영사 2005

      18 강현중, "민사소송법(제6판)" 박영사 2004

      19 호문혁, "민사소송법(제5판)" 법문사 2006

      20 김용진, "민사소송법(제3판 실통본)" 신영사 2005

      21 송상현, "민사소송법(전정판)" 박영사 1993

      22 정동윤, "민사소송법" 법문사 1998

      23 최성호, "민사소송법" 동방문화사 2009

      24 류승훈, "민사소송법" 신화 2005

      25 글로벌iT네트워크, "당뇨병 환자들에게 RFID 칩 이식"

      26 Naver 뉴스, "경기도 11월부터 등하굣길 안심서비스 제공"

      27 globalwindow, "건강 체크 칩 피부속에 내장한다"

      28 이상득, "개인정보의 프라이버시권 보호에 관한 연구"

      29 Naver 뉴스, "美기업가 이민자에 생체칩 인식 발언 논란"

      30 globalwindow, "日, IC 태그 사용해 컨테이너 관리한다"

      31 balwindow, "日, IC 태그 사용해 컨테이너 관리한다"

      32 靑柳武彦, "サイペー監視社會"

      33 joins 뉴스, "〔분수대〕생체칩"

      34 박정훈, "u-사회안전망구축을 위한 RFID태그의 이용가능성과 법적 과제" 과학기술법연구원 12 (12): 71-117, 2007

      35 WIKIPEDIA, "VeriChip"

      36 서프라이즈 미래의 기술-과학 학습만화, "Tip 베리칩(VeriChip)" 지경사 2007

      37 Simson Garfinkel, "Rfid(Applications, Security, And Privacy)" Addison-Wesley 2005

      38 Amal Graafstra, "Rfid Toys: X Cool Projects for Home, Office and Entertainment (Extremetech)(Paperback)" 티메카 2005

      39 25th International Conference of Data Protection & Privacy Commissioners, "Resolution on RFID"

      40 주학수, "RFID/USN 정보보호위협과 대응방안" 14 (14): 2004

      41 김동성, "RFID/USN 보안 연구대상 및 향후 추세" 15 (15): 2005

      42 구병문, "IT발전과 개인정보보호 관련 법적 현안 분석"

      43 김현곤, "IT 신기술 적용 해외사례 조사"

      44 RFID JOURNAL, "Can RFID Protect the Beef Supply?"

      45 헤럴드경제, "30개원 미만 촛불쇠고기 합의…한․캐나다"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2028 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2022-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : The Association For Korean Law Of Property -> THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-10-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> THE JOURNAL OF PROPERTY LAW KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.89 0.89 0.74
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.72 0.71 0.86 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼