RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Liability System and the Legal Nature of the Seller's Liability for Defective Goods under Korean Law and the PELS

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A79664277

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study attempts to provide a comparative overview of the liability
      systems Korean law and the PELS adopt, that is, the approaches taken by
      Korean law and the PELS to deal with various irregularities of contractual
      performance. In addition, it examines in a comparative way the questions
      of what is the position of the seller's liability for his delivery of defective
      goods under the chosen liability system and what is the legal nature of the
      seller's liability.
      The study finds that the dual liability system taken by Korean law has
      caused some complexities as to the matter of which liability is applicable in
      some borderline cases. The problem in such complexities is originated in
      that the remedies available and the limitation period applicable are
      differentiated in accordance with one's different categorization among three
      types of default under the general liability and defective performance under
      the seller's guarantee liability. In this light, the study argues that the unified
      liability system under the PELS is superior because its concept of
      non-performance embraces in a unitary manner all the aspects of default
      including defects in quality, quantity and title.
      In addition, it finds that Korean law has suffered endless debates on the
      question of what are the true contents of the same remedies of rescission
      and damages provided under the seller's guarantee liability as under the
      general liability. The debates have been come along on the basis of the
      traditional presumption among some of civil law jurisdictions that two
      liabilities be different in terms of not only their legal nature but also their
      contents of remedies. The study argues that the problem may be
      circumvented, first, by another way of thinking that the unified liability in
      Korean law is inferred from the specification of the identical remedies for
      both the general liability and the seller's guarantee liability under the KCC,
      second, by the preposition that the requirement of fault be depended upon
      what remedy the buyer seeks to claim rather than what liability he does to rely on.
      번역하기

      This study attempts to provide a comparative overview of the liability systems Korean law and the PELS adopt, that is, the approaches taken by Korean law and the PELS to deal with various irregularities of contractual performance. In addition, it e...

      This study attempts to provide a comparative overview of the liability
      systems Korean law and the PELS adopt, that is, the approaches taken by
      Korean law and the PELS to deal with various irregularities of contractual
      performance. In addition, it examines in a comparative way the questions
      of what is the position of the seller's liability for his delivery of defective
      goods under the chosen liability system and what is the legal nature of the
      seller's liability.
      The study finds that the dual liability system taken by Korean law has
      caused some complexities as to the matter of which liability is applicable in
      some borderline cases. The problem in such complexities is originated in
      that the remedies available and the limitation period applicable are
      differentiated in accordance with one's different categorization among three
      types of default under the general liability and defective performance under
      the seller's guarantee liability. In this light, the study argues that the unified
      liability system under the PELS is superior because its concept of
      non-performance embraces in a unitary manner all the aspects of default
      including defects in quality, quantity and title.
      In addition, it finds that Korean law has suffered endless debates on the
      question of what are the true contents of the same remedies of rescission
      and damages provided under the seller's guarantee liability as under the
      general liability. The debates have been come along on the basis of the
      traditional presumption among some of civil law jurisdictions that two
      liabilities be different in terms of not only their legal nature but also their
      contents of remedies. The study argues that the problem may be
      circumvented, first, by another way of thinking that the unified liability in
      Korean law is inferred from the specification of the identical remedies for
      both the general liability and the seller's guarantee liability under the KCC,
      second, by the preposition that the requirement of fault be depended upon
      what remedy the buyer seeks to claim rather than what liability he does to rely on.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Korean Law
      • Ⅲ. PELS
      • Ⅳ. Evaluation
      • Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks
      • Ⅰ. Introduction
      • Ⅱ. Korean Law
      • Ⅲ. PELS
      • Ⅳ. Evaluation
      • Ⅴ. Concluding Remarks
      • BIBLIOGRAPHY
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김대정, "채무불이행법과 하자담보책임법의 통합모색- 要件論을 중심으로 -" 한국민사법학회 (26) : 3-30, 2004

      2 Hartkamp, A, "Towards a European Civil Code" The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2004

      3 Choi, June-sun, "The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Korean Law"

      4 Eo, Yeon-eoi, "The Nature of the Guarantee Liability for Defective Goods" 19 : 226-, 1989

      5 Lee, Sang-kwang, "The Basic Matters in the Seller’s Guarantee liability" 283-, 1998

      6 Treitel, G, "Remedies for Breach of Contract" Clarendon Press 1988

      7 Kim, Dae-jeong, "Reconstruction of the Guarantee Liability for Defective Goods by the Contractual Liability Theory" (9) : 242-, 1993

      8 Lee, Young-hwan, "Re-examination of the Theories as to the Nature of the Seller’s Guarantee Liability" 16 : 1989

      9 Ahn, Choon-soo, "Problems under the Guarantee Liability Law" 419 : 1995

      10 Horn, N, "Private and Commercial Law" Oxford Univ. Press 93-, 1982

      1 김대정, "채무불이행법과 하자담보책임법의 통합모색- 要件論을 중심으로 -" 한국민사법학회 (26) : 3-30, 2004

      2 Hartkamp, A, "Towards a European Civil Code" The Hague: Kluwer Law International 2004

      3 Choi, June-sun, "The Unidroit Principles of International Commercial Contracts and Korean Law"

      4 Eo, Yeon-eoi, "The Nature of the Guarantee Liability for Defective Goods" 19 : 226-, 1989

      5 Lee, Sang-kwang, "The Basic Matters in the Seller’s Guarantee liability" 283-, 1998

      6 Treitel, G, "Remedies for Breach of Contract" Clarendon Press 1988

      7 Kim, Dae-jeong, "Reconstruction of the Guarantee Liability for Defective Goods by the Contractual Liability Theory" (9) : 242-, 1993

      8 Lee, Young-hwan, "Re-examination of the Theories as to the Nature of the Seller’s Guarantee Liability" 16 : 1989

      9 Ahn, Choon-soo, "Problems under the Guarantee Liability Law" 419 : 1995

      10 Horn, N, "Private and Commercial Law" Oxford Univ. Press 93-, 1982

      11 Hondius, E, "Principles of European Law on Sales" Oxford University Press 2008

      12 Lando, O, "Principles of European Contract Law" Kluwer Law International 2000

      13 Kim, Joo-soo, "Particulars in Obligatory Law" Samyoungsa 1997

      14 Lee, Eun-young, "Particulars in Obligatory Law" Pakyoungsa 2005

      15 Kwak, Yun-jik, "Particulars in Obligatory Law" Pakyoungsa 2003

      16 Kim, Hyung-bae, "Particulars in Obligatory Law" Pakyoungsa 1997

      17 Kim, Jeung-han, "Particulars in Obligatory Law" Pakyoungsa 2006

      18 Kim, Ki-sun, "Particulars in Korean Obligatory Law" Bobmunsa 1988

      19 Kim, Hyung-bae, "Lectures on Civil Law" Pakyoungsa 2008

      20 Cho, Kyu-chang, "Guarantee Liability for Defective Goods" 221-, 1983

      21 Markesinis, B, "German Law of Obligations" Oxford Univ. Press 1997

      22 Kwak, Yun-jik, "General Rules in Obligatory Law" Pakyoungsa 2006

      23 Fauvarque-Cosson, B, "European Contract Law - Materials for a Common Frame of Reference" European Law Publishers 2008

      24 Kim, Dong-hoon, "Ein Versuch zur Integration der Nichterfüllungs - und Sachmängelhaftung" 251-, 2003

      25 Ahn, Bup-young, "Damages for Defective Goods" 194 : 1995

      26 Zweigert, K, "An Introduction to Comparative Law" Oxford Univ. Press 1998

      27 Jee, Won-lim, "A Study as to the Categories of Non-performance" (15) : 374-, 1997

      28 Lee, Byung-mun, "A Comparative Study on the Seller's Liability for Non-conforming Goods under CISG, English law, European Law and Korean Law, Doctoral thesis" Univ. of Warwick 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.83 0.83 0.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.78 0.77 0.747 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼