지방자치단체 자체평가모형의 설계와 적용 그리고 교훈

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A focus on results is a central element in recent public sector reforms in OECD countries. Performance evaluation is an essential part of government reform movement popularized since 1990s. Governments across the world have tried search the way to achieve. high performance and results of various government activities and program. Evaluation is important in a results-oriented environment because it provides feedback on the efficiency, effectiveness and performance of public policies and can be critical to policy improvement and innovation. In essence, it contributes to accountable governance.In the background, the purpose of this paper is to grope development plan through design and application of self~evaluation model for Korean Local Government based on the Government Performance Evaluation Act of 2001.In order to design of the self-evaluation model, I reviewed related literature and governmental official document. At the results of review, I found 3 mode! which can apply for self~evaluation of Korean Local Government. That are Project evaluation model, Service evaluation model and Organization evaluation model. Through the study, one of them selected as self evaluation model. That is service evaluation model. The results of this study should be improved the guiding principle on the self-evaluation of Local government. Specially, Local government evaluation should be combined with priority given to the self-evaluation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박희정, "지방정부 자체평가모형의 탐색을 위한 시론적 연구" 2003

2 김시영, "지방정부 공공서비스의 성과평가모형에 관한 소고" 한국정책분석평가학회 8 (8): 1996

3 김상묵, "지방자치단체의 실적평가 필요성과 방법" 1996

4 한표환, "지방자치단체 지역개발사업의 평가체계 및 기법개발" 한국지방행정연구원 1999

5 라휘문, "지방자치단체 자체평가제도의 발전방향" 한국정책분석평가학회 2003

6 행정자치부, "지방자치단체 자체평가 지침" 행정자치부 2003

7 박재완, "지방자치단체 성과평가＂" 한국지방행정연구원). 14 (14): 2000

8 총무처 직무분석기획단, "신정부혁신론" 동명사 1997

9 김성준, "기관별 주요업무에 대한 성과평가지표 개발" 한국행정연구원 2002

10 양기용, "광역자치단체 평가시스템 개발에 관한 연구" 경기개발연구원 1998

11 Brouwer, B, "The Local Government Self-assessment Tool: Its Niche in Governance Assessment＂" 2003

12 Wholey, "The Case for Performance Monitoring" 1992

13 Vedung, Evert, "Public Policy and Program Evaluation" 1997

14 Poister, "Performance Measurement in Municipal Government Assessing the State of the Practice" 1983

15 Rogers, Steve, "Performance Management in Local Government" Longman 1990

16 Ingram, "Lessons and Challenges for Performance Evaluation＂ Developing a Performance Evaluation System in Korea" 17-18, 2002

17 Suvedi, M, "Introduction to Program Evaluation" 1999

18 Case R, "How can We Do It? an evaluation training package for development educators Research and Development in Global Studies" 1988

19 Epstein,Paul D, "Get Ready:The Time for Performance Measurement is Finally Coming" 52 (52): 1992

20 Evert, "Five Observations on Evaluation in Sweden" North-Holland 1992

21 Audit Commission, "Comprehensive Performance Assessment" 2002