RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    결과물 지향의 전체과제 접근이 문제해결력과 인지부하 및 학습만족도에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Product-Oriented Whole-Task Approach on Problem Solving, Cognitive Load, and Satisfaction

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959629

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of current study is to investigate the effects of product-oriented whole-task versus process-oriented part-task approach on complex problem solving using computer program in term of pre-service teacher`s achievement, germane cognitive load and satisfaction. Under product-oriented whole-task approach, instructor presented the whole-task worked-example from the beginning of learning and practiced the major subordinate tasks by associating them with whole-task worked-example. Under process-oriented part-task approach, on the other hand, instructor practiced subordinate part-tasks with part-task worked example but without associating the whole-task until the final step of part task. 36 pre-service teachers participated in a pretest, learning activity, post-test, and survey. Study results report that product-oriented whole-task group solved a given problem significantly better than the other did. At the same time, product-oriented whole-task group perceived more germane cognitive load by expressing higher confidence on solving the given problem and less task difficulty than the other did, Product-oriented whole-task group expressed higher satisfaction with their learning experience than the other did. The current study suggests that product-oriented whole task is more effective approach than that of process-oriented part-task for complex problem solving.
    번역하기

    The purpose of current study is to investigate the effects of product-oriented whole-task versus process-oriented part-task approach on complex problem solving using computer program in term of pre-service teacher`s achievement, germane cognitive load...

    The purpose of current study is to investigate the effects of product-oriented whole-task versus process-oriented part-task approach on complex problem solving using computer program in term of pre-service teacher`s achievement, germane cognitive load and satisfaction. Under product-oriented whole-task approach, instructor presented the whole-task worked-example from the beginning of learning and practiced the major subordinate tasks by associating them with whole-task worked-example. Under process-oriented part-task approach, on the other hand, instructor practiced subordinate part-tasks with part-task worked example but without associating the whole-task until the final step of part task. 36 pre-service teachers participated in a pretest, learning activity, post-test, and survey. Study results report that product-oriented whole-task group solved a given problem significantly better than the other did. At the same time, product-oriented whole-task group perceived more germane cognitive load by expressing higher confidence on solving the given problem and less task difficulty than the other did, Product-oriented whole-task group expressed higher satisfaction with their learning experience than the other did. The current study suggests that product-oriented whole task is more effective approach than that of process-oriented part-task for complex problem solving.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "하이퍼텍스트에서 탐색도구들의 작동기억 부하량과 부하량 감소에 대한 상대적 효과" 8 (8): 189-217, 2002

    2 "인지과학적 구성주의 기반의 4C/ID 모형" 아카데미 프레스 2005

    3 "웹기반 학습에서 학습자료 유형과 학습내용 제시 시기가 인지부하, 효과성 및 효율성에 미치는 효과" 20 (20): 111-145, 2004

    4 "멀티미디어 학습 환경에서 학습자 특성별 인지부하 효과" 21 (21): 79-102, 2005

    5 "When problem solving is superior to studying worked example" 93 : 597-588, 2001

    6 "Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills Journal of Educational Psychology" 122-133, 1994

    7 "Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education: Product oriented versus process-oriented worked examples." 21 (21): 287-297, 2005

    8 "Training for reflective expertise A four-component instructional design model for training complex cognitive skills" 23-43, 1992

    9 "Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training." Educational Technology Publications 1997

    10 "Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training" Educational Technology Publications 1997

    1 "하이퍼텍스트에서 탐색도구들의 작동기억 부하량과 부하량 감소에 대한 상대적 효과" 8 (8): 189-217, 2002

    2 "인지과학적 구성주의 기반의 4C/ID 모형" 아카데미 프레스 2005

    3 "웹기반 학습에서 학습자료 유형과 학습내용 제시 시기가 인지부하, 효과성 및 효율성에 미치는 효과" 20 (20): 111-145, 2004

    4 "멀티미디어 학습 환경에서 학습자 특성별 인지부하 효과" 21 (21): 79-102, 2005

    5 "When problem solving is superior to studying worked example" 93 : 597-588, 2001

    6 "Variability of worked examples and transfer of geometrical problem-solving skills Journal of Educational Psychology" 122-133, 1994

    7 "Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education: Product oriented versus process-oriented worked examples." 21 (21): 287-297, 2005

    8 "Training for reflective expertise A four-component instructional design model for training complex cognitive skills" 23-43, 1992

    9 "Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training." Educational Technology Publications 1997

    10 "Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training" Educational Technology Publications 1997

    11 "Taking the Load Off a Learner's Mind: Instructional Design for Complex Learning." 38 (38): 5-13, 2003

    12 "Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective" 38 (38): 15-22, 2003

    13 "Structuring the Transition From Example Study to Problem Solving in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Cognitive Load Perspective" 38 (38): 15-22, 2003

    14 "Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences" 1988

    15 "Process-oriented worked examples: improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding." 32 : 83-98, 2004

    16 "Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity" 94 : 405-415, 2002

    17 "Motivation by Design" Unpublished Workbook Florida State University 1989

    18 "Learning from worked-out examples: The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanation." 23 : 90-108, 1998

    19 "Learning from examples: Instructional principles from the worked examples research." 70 (70): 181-214, 2000

    20 "Handbook of individual differences" 209-219, 1993

    21 "Effects of task complexity and task organization on the relative efficiency of part and whole training methods Journal of Experimental psychology" 217-224, 1963

    22 "Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning." 38 (38): 53-61, 2003

    23 "Cognitive load theory and aging: Effects of worked examples on training efficiency" 12 : 87-105, 2002

    24 "Cognitive load measurement as a measns to advance cognitive load theory." 38 (38): 63-71, 2003

    25 "Cognitive load during problem solving:Effects on learning" 12 : 257-285, 1988

    26 "Cognitive architecture and instructional design." 10 : 251-296, 1998

    27 "Blue-prints for complex learning: The 4CID-model." 50 (50): 39-64, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼