RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Beyond the logic of representation in play theories: postmodern perspectives on children’s role play

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104846236

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct the logic of representation developed in academic traditions of play theories, and to explore a desirable direction of postmodern pedagogy of play appreciating the aesthetic nature of children’s dynamic vitality and relational transformations of selves occurring in play activities. Discussions are methodologically guided by implications drawn from postmodern thinkers.
      It is discussed that the logic of representation has been constructed by epistemological streams from ancient Greek philosophy to the evolution theory in modern times. Interpretations of four different aspects of classroom role play are also made in this study: first, typified genre modality behaviors as the web of intertextual metonymy with the closed nature of self-referentiality and limited representation of life reality; second, meta-communication as the open space of in-betweenness that characterizes the indeterminacy of childhood play; third, children's attempts toward educationally tabooed plays understood in terms of their transgressive vitality enabling children to take a leap of vision above bi-unidirectional thinking; lastly, children’s active meaning-making and relational self-transformation occurring when contextualized situation and specific identities are provided. Conclusion is made that postmodern pedagogy for children needs to be guided by aesthetic sensitivity that can appreciate the children’s dynamic vitality to make the rich and ever-new process of becoming in play.
      번역하기

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct t...

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct the logic of representation developed in academic traditions of play theories, and to explore a desirable direction of postmodern pedagogy of play appreciating the aesthetic nature of children’s dynamic vitality and relational transformations of selves occurring in play activities. Discussions are methodologically guided by implications drawn from postmodern thinkers.
      It is discussed that the logic of representation has been constructed by epistemological streams from ancient Greek philosophy to the evolution theory in modern times. Interpretations of four different aspects of classroom role play are also made in this study: first, typified genre modality behaviors as the web of intertextual metonymy with the closed nature of self-referentiality and limited representation of life reality; second, meta-communication as the open space of in-betweenness that characterizes the indeterminacy of childhood play; third, children's attempts toward educationally tabooed plays understood in terms of their transgressive vitality enabling children to take a leap of vision above bi-unidirectional thinking; lastly, children’s active meaning-making and relational self-transformation occurring when contextualized situation and specific identities are provided. Conclusion is made that postmodern pedagogy for children needs to be guided by aesthetic sensitivity that can appreciate the children’s dynamic vitality to make the rich and ever-new process of becoming in play.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct the logic of representation developed in academic traditions of play theories, and to explore a desirable direction of postmodern pedagogy of play appreciating the aesthetic nature of children’s dynamic vitality and relational transformations of selves occurring in play activities. Discussions are methodologically guided by implications drawn from postmodern thinkers.
      It is discussed that the logic of representation has been constructed by epistemological streams from ancient Greek philosophy to the evolution theory in modern times. Interpretations of four different aspects of classroom role play are also made in this study: first, typified genre modality behaviors as the web of intertextual metonymy with the closed nature of self-referentiality and limited representation of life reality; second, meta-communication as the open space of in-betweenness that characterizes the indeterminacy of childhood play; third, children's attempts toward educationally tabooed plays understood in terms of their transgressive vitality enabling children to take a leap of vision above bi-unidirectional thinking; lastly, children’s active meaning-making and relational self-transformation occurring when contextualized situation and specific identities are provided. Conclusion is made that postmodern pedagogy for children needs to be guided by aesthetic sensitivity that can appreciate the children’s dynamic vitality to make the rich and ever-new process of becoming in play.
      번역하기

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct t...

      The notion of play-based curriculum is one of the most distinctive features of child-centered education in which play is commonly assumed as the representation of children's inner mind or of life reality. It is attempted in this study to deconstruct the logic of representation developed in academic traditions of play theories, and to explore a desirable direction of postmodern pedagogy of play appreciating the aesthetic nature of children’s dynamic vitality and relational transformations of selves occurring in play activities. Discussions are methodologically guided by implications drawn from postmodern thinkers.
      It is discussed that the logic of representation has been constructed by epistemological streams from ancient Greek philosophy to the evolution theory in modern times. Interpretations of four different aspects of classroom role play are also made in this study: first, typified genre modality behaviors as the web of intertextual metonymy with the closed nature of self-referentiality and limited representation of life reality; second, meta-communication as the open space of in-betweenness that characterizes the indeterminacy of childhood play; third, children's attempts toward educationally tabooed plays understood in terms of their transgressive vitality enabling children to take a leap of vision above bi-unidirectional thinking; lastly, children’s active meaning-making and relational self-transformation occurring when contextualized situation and specific identities are provided. Conclusion is made that postmodern pedagogy for children needs to be guided by aesthetic sensitivity that can appreciate the children’s dynamic vitality to make the rich and ever-new process of becoming in play.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 안준희, "콧수염 좀 건네주세요: 미국 중산층 아동들의 사회화 맥락 재해석과 변형" 한국교육인류학회 11 (11): 235-253, 2008

      2 유혜령, "유아의 역할 놀이에 나타난 모방과 창조의 미학" 한국유아교육학회 24 (24): 277-303, 2004

      3 강현석, "놀이 이론의 재개념화를 통한 유아교육과정 통합 전략의 탐구" 미래유아교육학회 12 (12): 33-65, 2005

      4 "curriculum: An general introduction" Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

      5 Gadamer,H.‐G, "Truth and method (2nd revised Ed.)" Continuum 1996

      6 Schwartzman,H, "Transformation: the anthropology of children’s play" Plenum 1987

      7 Foucault,M, "This is not a pipe" University of California Press 1983

      8 Sutton‐Smith,B, "The rhetorics of adult and child play theories" 10 : 149-162, 1999

      9 Aristotle, "The poetics" Harvard University Press 1939

      10 Sutton‐Smith,B, "The dialectics of play" Verlag Hoffman 1976

      1 안준희, "콧수염 좀 건네주세요: 미국 중산층 아동들의 사회화 맥락 재해석과 변형" 한국교육인류학회 11 (11): 235-253, 2008

      2 유혜령, "유아의 역할 놀이에 나타난 모방과 창조의 미학" 한국유아교육학회 24 (24): 277-303, 2004

      3 강현석, "놀이 이론의 재개념화를 통한 유아교육과정 통합 전략의 탐구" 미래유아교육학회 12 (12): 33-65, 2005

      4 "curriculum: An general introduction" Ministry of Education, Science and Technology

      5 Gadamer,H.‐G, "Truth and method (2nd revised Ed.)" Continuum 1996

      6 Schwartzman,H, "Transformation: the anthropology of children’s play" Plenum 1987

      7 Foucault,M, "This is not a pipe" University of California Press 1983

      8 Sutton‐Smith,B, "The rhetorics of adult and child play theories" 10 : 149-162, 1999

      9 Aristotle, "The poetics" Harvard University Press 1939

      10 Sutton‐Smith,B, "The dialectics of play" Verlag Hoffman 1976

      11 Foucault,M, "The archaeology of knowledge" Tavistock Publications 1972

      12 Bloom,A, "The Republic of Plato" Basic Books 1968

      13 Barthes,R, "S/Z" Hill and Wang 1987

      14 Guss,F, "Reconceptualizing play: aesthetic self‐definitions" 6 (6): 233-243, 2005

      15 Wing,L.A, "Play is not the work of the child: young children’s perceptions of work and play" 10 : 223-247, 1995

      16 Frost, J. L, "Play and child development" Merrill Prentice Hall 2001

      17 Kim,D.H, "Metaphors and Metonymies" 5 : 63-83, 1999

      18 Derrida,J, "Margins of philosophy" University of Chicago Press. 1982

      19 Spariosu,M, "Literature, mimesis and play" Tubingen 1982

      20 Korean Ministry of Education, "Korean Ministry of Education, Science and Technology"

      21 Jin,J.G, "Jin Jung Gweon's lectures on modern aesthetics" Art Books 2003

      22 Huizinga,J, "Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture" Beacon Press 1955

      23 Reifel, S, "From category to context: Reconsidering classroom play" 8 (8): 347-367, 1993

      24 Bredekamp, S, "Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs" NAEYC

      25 Derrida,J, "Desseminations" University of Chicago Press 1981

      26 Yeu,H.-R, "Deconstructing the theories of play education" Yeungnam University 2008

      27 Cannella, G. S, "Deconstructing early childhood education" Changji-sa 2002

      28 Goldman,L.R, "Child’s play: myth, mimesis and make‐believe" Berg 1998

      29 Bateson,G, "Child’s play" J. Wiley and Sons 261-266, 1971

      30 Yeu,H.-R, "Children’s modes of experiencing role‐play activities and their educational meaning: A phenomenological understanding" 21 (21): 55-79, 2001

      31 Suh,K.O, "Beyond educational day toward children’s day: fragments of relationship, argument, and play" 2008

      32 Hae-Ryung Yeu, "Beyond Monologue Toward Dialogue: Understanding a Pedagogy of Responsibility in Postmodern Perspectives" 한국유아교육학회 12 (12): 29-53, 2006

      33 Deleuze,G, "A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia" University of Minnesota Press 1987

      34 Trawick‐Smith,J, "A qualitative analysis of metaplay in the preschool years" 13 (13): 433-452, 1998

      35 Yeu,H.-R, "A phenomenological study on children's modes of experiencing the educational media environment in free-choice activities" 18 (18): 131-152, 1998

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-12-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Anthropology of Education -> The Journal of Anthropology of Education KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.45 1.45 1.46
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.49 1.5 1.903 0.42
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼