국내자산운용사의 성과관리 편의에 대한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Somewhat structural problems are hidden in the recent growth of the domestic fund industry. Fund product which is a kind of indirect investment through professionals needs to secure the trust and the reliability to be desirable investment in the market. However, this is not the case in the domestic fund industry. Asset Management Companies leave behind performance management of the existing funds that don`t have good records and establish new funds to make issues in the investment environments at that time and to stimulate the investor`s sentiment. Additionally, investors make irrational investment decisions without rational reviews on various kinds of aspects such as the history or the style of the fund management and inclinations of the fund manager. Consequently, the emergence of long-term large scale fund is delayed, while the demand on the funds has increased through new funds that have not been proven at all. The practice of the expansion of fund sales through the issuance of new funds weaken the position of long-term fund products together with the short-term investment tendency of the domestic investors and mass produce small size funds. It is not good for the Asset Management Companies either as they have to endure the structural problem of high cost and low profit because the average amount of the funds is relatively small although they have to manage a great number of funds. Therefore, there are high probabilities that Asset Management Companies will try to resolve inefficient managerial problems by managing performance focusing on the funds that will give good cost-benefit to them. In such reality of domestic Equity Fund Industry, this research shows the Performance Management Bias phenomenon from the perspective of the fund supplier so to speak Asset Management Companies. We think that is need to identify the problems of domestic equity fund market and the research results are shown below. First of all, all the subject funds are classified as PM Fund (Performance Managed Fund) Group which the Asset Management Companies may have greater desire to manage the performance and NPM Fund (Non-Performance Managed Fund) Group which have less desire. Additionally, through empirically verifying three predefined assumptions on classified fund groups, we specify the Performance Management Bias which is the purpose of this study. The first assumption was ``The performance of PM Fund is better than that of NPM Fund``. When applying the performance of both groups using Jensen`s Alpha which represents abnormal returns in CAPM, a market equilibrium model, PM funds usually show abnormal returns while NPM funds don`t. When breaking down the causes of such abnormal returns as stock selection ability and sales timing capability of fund managers, there is not much difference between two fund groups in sales timing capability. On the other hand, the stock selection abilities of fund managers are exercised in PM fund group only which result in the differentiated performance in PM funds. The second assumption is ``Asset Management Companies exercised differentiated performance management on PM Funds.`` During the verification of the assumptions, we find out that the funds, showed good performance in the past, enabled fund managers to perform active investment activities as they have more managing power. However, in PM Group funds, they show higher abnormal returns as the investment become more concentrated, as the fund manager exercises his stock selection ability. On the other hand, in NPM Fund Group funds, fund managers don`t show their stock selection abilities even when the level of investment concentration become higher and don`t realize abnormal returns. In case of sales timing of fund managers, there is no significant difference between two fund groups. In other words, while sales timing capability of fund managers don`t contribute to abnormal returns, stock selection ability of fund managers make two groups` abnormal return differe

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "한국금융투자협회 홈페이지"

2 박영규, "펀드투자자와 펀드매니저의 투자 행태에 관한 연구" 한국재무학회 18 (18): 31-67, 2005

3 임웅기, "투자신탁 주식형 펀드의 주식보유 자료를 이용한 투자성과 평가" 20 : 139-179, 1997

4 주효근, "스타펀드를 보유한 자산운용회사의 자금유입 및 미래성과" 성균관대학교 2008

5 Jain Perm C., "Truth in Mutual Fund Advertising:Evidence on Future Performance and Fund Flow" 55 (55): 937-958, 2000

6 Brown, Stephen J, "Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies" 5 (5): 553-580, 1992

7 Elton, Edwin J, "Survivorship Bias and Mutual Fund Performance" 9 (9): 1097-1120, 1996

8 Chevalier, Judith, "Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentive" 105 (105): 1167-1200, 1997

9 Marcin Kacperczyk, "On the Industry Concentration of Actively Managed Equity Mutual Funds" LX (LX): 1983-2011, 2005

10 윤영섭, "On market timing and stock selection performanace:Evidence from Korean fund markets" 2008

11 Carhart,Mark M, "On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance" 52 (52): 57-82, 1997

12 Grinblatt, M., "Mutual fund performance: An analysis of quarterly portfolio holdings" (62) : 393-416, 1989

13 Carhart, Mark M., "Mutual Fund Survivorship" 15 (15): 1439-1463, 2002

14 Wermers,Russ, "Mutual Fund Performance:An Empirical Decomposition into Stock Picking Talent,Style,Transactions Costs,and Expense" 55 (55): 1655-1695, 2000

15 Fama, Eugene F., "Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies" 51 (51): 55-84, 1996

16 Ferson, Wayne, "Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions" 51 : 425-462, 1996

17 Zheng,Lu, "Is money smart? A study of mutual fund investors'fund selection ability" 54 : 901-933, 1999

18 원승연, "How do fund families utilize the fund performance evaluation system" 증권학회 1997

19 Massa,Massimo, "How do Family Strategies affect fund performance? When Performance-Maximization in not the only game in town" 67 : 249-304, 2003

20 Nanda, Vikram, "Family Values and the Star Phenomenon:Strategies of Mutual Fund Families" 17 (17): 667-698, 2004

21 Sirri, Erik R., "Costly Research and Mutual Fund Flow" 53 (53): 1589-1622, 1998

22 Fama, Eugene F., "Common Risk Factors in the Returns on Stocks and Bonds" 33 : 3-56, 1993

23 Goetzmann, W.. N, "Cognitive Dissonance and Mutual Fund Investors" 20 : 145-158, 1997

24 Elton, Edwin J, "Are investors rational:Choice among index funds" 59 : 261-288, 2004

25 Gruber,Martin J, "Another puzzle:The growth in actively managed mutual funds" 51 : 783-810, 1996