RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    팀 다양성 수렴 메커니즘이 팀 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 이론적 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856913

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    In recent years many organizations tend to be more diverse in terms of gender, age, functional background, educational background, tenure and so forth. The increase of diversity in workforce has indeed become inevitable reality. However, relevant studies on the relationship between diversity and performance have indicated contrasting arguments. Some argue that task-related diversity produces positive effects on performance by incorporating various ideas and perspectives for problem solving and innovation, whereas personal-related diversity dampens performance due to the lack of communication and subgroup conflict. To resolve this controversy, this study proposes the moderation effect of diversity convergence mechanism on performance, which is mobilized by sharing task knowledge and team identity. Specifically, we propose that team diversity can enact a role of synergy for team performance under such convergence mechanisms. Shared task knowledge about key elements of the team`s relevant environment may enhance team members` coordination and effectiveness in performing tasks that are complex and unpredictable. Shared team identity would also make team members to share team`s vision, mission, value, and objective which help solving various kinds of problem that shared task knowledge could not solve entirely. Team members who share similar task knowledge and identity can anticipate each other`s responses and coordinate effectively. A majority of existing research, however, has studied the influence of diversity and shared task knowledge/team identity independently - how workforce diversity influence on team performance positively or negatively and how sharing of task knowledge and team identity have a positive effect on team performance. This study proposes an integrated model that would combine the two different research. That is, if diversity would be defined as the mechanism that can lead a divergent effect to produce various information and knowledge, diversity could bring a synergy effect on team performance only when the divergent resource could be integrated with shared task knowledge and team identity as a convergence mechanism. The sharing task knowledge and team identity could play a critical moderating role to integrate the divergent diversity effect. If the team diversity is regarded as various human capital, the sharing of task knowledge and team identity would be the convergence mechanism to utilize diversity positively. It is in a high level of shard task knowledge and shared team identity that task-related diversities (i.e., functional background, educational background, and team tenure) lead to team performance. In the personal-related diversities (i.e., gender, age, and birthplace), however, shared task knowledge may not play the convergence mechanism enough to override the negative effect of personal-related diversity; only shared team identity mitigates negative effects and thus utilizes diversity`s positive potential. In conclusion, we need to understand the processes through which and the conditions under which diversity may bring high team performance. The clarification of when and how diversity would bring some positive or negative effect has been big concern and diversity management is desperately required for maximizing positive potentials and mitigating negative effect of diversity. Even though diversity might have positive potential in a long-term, it would not be easy to utilize diversity effectively in the workplace until we can address the mechanism of it correctly. We also discussed the managerial implications of our claims.
    번역하기

    In recent years many organizations tend to be more diverse in terms of gender, age, functional background, educational background, tenure and so forth. The increase of diversity in workforce has indeed become inevitable reality. However, relevant stud...

    In recent years many organizations tend to be more diverse in terms of gender, age, functional background, educational background, tenure and so forth. The increase of diversity in workforce has indeed become inevitable reality. However, relevant studies on the relationship between diversity and performance have indicated contrasting arguments. Some argue that task-related diversity produces positive effects on performance by incorporating various ideas and perspectives for problem solving and innovation, whereas personal-related diversity dampens performance due to the lack of communication and subgroup conflict. To resolve this controversy, this study proposes the moderation effect of diversity convergence mechanism on performance, which is mobilized by sharing task knowledge and team identity. Specifically, we propose that team diversity can enact a role of synergy for team performance under such convergence mechanisms. Shared task knowledge about key elements of the team`s relevant environment may enhance team members` coordination and effectiveness in performing tasks that are complex and unpredictable. Shared team identity would also make team members to share team`s vision, mission, value, and objective which help solving various kinds of problem that shared task knowledge could not solve entirely. Team members who share similar task knowledge and identity can anticipate each other`s responses and coordinate effectively. A majority of existing research, however, has studied the influence of diversity and shared task knowledge/team identity independently - how workforce diversity influence on team performance positively or negatively and how sharing of task knowledge and team identity have a positive effect on team performance. This study proposes an integrated model that would combine the two different research. That is, if diversity would be defined as the mechanism that can lead a divergent effect to produce various information and knowledge, diversity could bring a synergy effect on team performance only when the divergent resource could be integrated with shared task knowledge and team identity as a convergence mechanism. The sharing task knowledge and team identity could play a critical moderating role to integrate the divergent diversity effect. If the team diversity is regarded as various human capital, the sharing of task knowledge and team identity would be the convergence mechanism to utilize diversity positively. It is in a high level of shard task knowledge and shared team identity that task-related diversities (i.e., functional background, educational background, and team tenure) lead to team performance. In the personal-related diversities (i.e., gender, age, and birthplace), however, shared task knowledge may not play the convergence mechanism enough to override the negative effect of personal-related diversity; only shared team identity mitigates negative effects and thus utilizes diversity`s positive potential. In conclusion, we need to understand the processes through which and the conditions under which diversity may bring high team performance. The clarification of when and how diversity would bring some positive or negative effect has been big concern and diversity management is desperately required for maximizing positive potentials and mitigating negative effect of diversity. Even though diversity might have positive potential in a long-term, it would not be easy to utilize diversity effectively in the workplace until we can address the mechanism of it correctly. We also discussed the managerial implications of our claims.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정예지, "팀 몰입과 조직몰입, 과연 두 마 리 토끼인가?: 문화적 자본과 사회적 자본의 역할" 한국인사조직학회 2009

    2 박오수, "팀 내 공유된 인식모델 형성의 영향요인 및 결과에 관한 연구" 한국인사 조직학회 2003

    3 성지영, "팀 내 개인간 인구통계학적 비유사성과 개인성과의 관계에 관한 연구 : 비선형효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 139-175, 2008

    4 이호욱, "최고경영진의 다양성이 국제적 제휴에 미치는 효과" 한국인사·조직학회 12 (12): 1-34, 2004

    5 임희정, "인지 및 동기요인이 지식근로자의 팀 성과와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향" 한국인사·조직학회 13 (13): 99-137, 2005

    6 "매경 이코노미"

    7 성상현, "다양성이 프로젝트 팀의 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국인사·조직학회 15 (15): 39-70, 2007

    8 이지우, "고용형태에 따른 직무특성과 조직몰입의 관계" 한국인사조직학회 10 (10): 1-26, 2002

    9 van Knippenberg, D., "Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda" 89 : 1008-1022, 2004

    10 van Knippenberg, D, "Work group diversity" 58 : 515-541, 2007

    1 정예지, "팀 몰입과 조직몰입, 과연 두 마 리 토끼인가?: 문화적 자본과 사회적 자본의 역할" 한국인사조직학회 2009

    2 박오수, "팀 내 공유된 인식모델 형성의 영향요인 및 결과에 관한 연구" 한국인사 조직학회 2003

    3 성지영, "팀 내 개인간 인구통계학적 비유사성과 개인성과의 관계에 관한 연구 : 비선형효과를 중심으로" 한국인사조직학회 16 (16): 139-175, 2008

    4 이호욱, "최고경영진의 다양성이 국제적 제휴에 미치는 효과" 한국인사·조직학회 12 (12): 1-34, 2004

    5 임희정, "인지 및 동기요인이 지식근로자의 팀 성과와 혁신행동에 미치는 영향" 한국인사·조직학회 13 (13): 99-137, 2005

    6 "매경 이코노미"

    7 성상현, "다양성이 프로젝트 팀의 성과에 미치는 영향" 한국인사·조직학회 15 (15): 39-70, 2007

    8 이지우, "고용형태에 따른 직무특성과 조직몰입의 관계" 한국인사조직학회 10 (10): 1-26, 2002

    9 van Knippenberg, D., "Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda" 89 : 1008-1022, 2004

    10 van Knippenberg, D, "Work group diversity" 58 : 515-541, 2007

    11 O'Reilly, C. A., "Work group demography, social integration, and turnover" 34 : 21-37, 1989

    12 Rentsch, J. R, "Why do ‘greate minds’ think alike: Antecedents of team member schema agreement" 22 : 107-120, 2001

    13 Jehn, K. A., "Why differences make a difference" 44 : 741-763, 1999

    14 Zellmer-Bruhn, M. E., "When and how do differences matter? An exploration of perceived similarity in teams" 107 (107): 41-59, 2008

    15 Kearney, E., "When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members' need for cognition" 52 (52): 581-598, 2009

    16 Chatman, J. A, "Using self-categorization theory to understand relational demography-based variation in people's responsiveness to organizational culture" 48 (48): 321-331, 2005

    17 Jackson, S. E., "Understanding of dynamics of diversity in decision-making teams In Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations" Jossey-Bass Publishers 204-261, 1995

    18 Hinds, P. J, "Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication" 16 (16): 290-307, 2005

    19 Zhang, Z. X., "Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance" 92 (92): 1722-1730, 2007

    20 Duncan, P. C., "Training teams working in complex systems: A mental model-based approach" 8 : 173-231, 1993

    21 Thoms. P, "Training business leaders to create positive organizational visions of the future: Is it successful" Omnipress 212-216, 1995

    22 Salas, E., "Towards an understanding of team performance and training In Teams: Their training and performance" Ablex 1992

    23 "Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty" 51 (51): 768-784, 200808

    24 Knight, D., "Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus" 20 : 445-465, 1999

    25 Smith, K. G., "Top management team demography and process: The role of social integration and communication" 39 (39): 36-68, 1994

    26 Wiersema, M. F, "Top management team demography and corporate strategic change" 35 : 91-121, 1992

    27 Murray,A.L, "Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance" 10 : 125-141, 1989

    28 Bantel, K. A, "Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference" 10 : 107-125, 1989

    29 Sackett, P., "Tokenism on performance evaluation: The effect of work representation on malefemale and black-white differences in performance ratings" 55 : 263-267, 1991

    30 Spangler, E., "Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis" 84 : 160-170, 1978

    31 Harrison, D. A., "Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surfaceand deep-level diversity on group functioning" 45 : 1029-1045, 2002

    32 Moorhead, G., "The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink for the 21st century" 73 : 327-351, 1998

    33 Tajfel, H, "The social identity theory of intergroup behavior In Psychology of intergroup relations" Nelson-Hall 7-24, 1986

    34 Hobman, E. V, "The role of team identification in the dissimilarityconflict relationship" 9 : 483-507, 2006

    35 Allport,G.W, "The nature of prejudice" Addison-Wesley 1954

    36 Baron, R. M, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

    37 Mohammed, S., "The measurement of mental models: we have no shared schema" 3 : 123-165, 2000

    38 Hambrick, D. C., "The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms' competitive moves" 41 (41): 659-684, 1996

    39 Mathieu, J. E., "The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance" 85 : 273-282, 2000

    40 Chatman, J. A, "The influence of demographic heterogeneity on the emergence and consequences of cooperative norms in work teams" 44 (44): 956-974, 2001

    41 Peccei, R, "The impact of sex similarity on employee satisfaction at work: A review and re-evaluation" 42 (42): 1571-1592, 2005

    42 Peltokorpi,V, "The impact of relational diversity and socio-cultural context on interpersonal communication: Nordic subsidiaries in Japan" 5 (5): 333-356, 2006

    43 Bourdieu,P, "The forms of capital In Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education" Greenwood 241-258, 1986

    44 Senge,P.M, "The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization" 1990

    45 Horwitz, S. K, "The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography" 33 (33): 987-1015, 2007

    46 Rico, R., "The effects of diversity faultlines and team task autonomy on decision quality and social integration" 33 : 111-133, 2007

    47 Jackson,S.E, "The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams In Handbook of work group psychology" John Wiley & Sons 531-552, 1996

    48 De Wit, F. R. C, "The black-box deciphered: A meta-analysis of team diversity, conflict, and team performance" 1-6, 2008

    49 Lawrence,B.S, "The black box of organizational demography" 8 (8): 1-22, 1997

    50 Byrne,D, "The attraction paradigm" Academic Press 1971

    51 Jehn, K. A, "The Dynamics Nature of Conflict: A Longitudinal Study of Intragroup Conflict and Group Performance" 44 (44): 238-251, 2001

    52 The Houghton Mifflin Company, "The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Fourth Edition" The Houghton Mifflin Company 2000

    53 Mohammed, S, "Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: Expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries" 22 : 89-106, 2001

    54 Lim, B. C, "Team mental models and team performance: A field study of the effects of team mental model similarity and accuracy" 27 (27): 403-418, 2006

    55 Klimoski, R, "Team mental model: Construct or metaphor" 20 : 403-437, 1994

    56 노현탁, "THE ROLE OF CONTEXT IN WORK TEAM DIVERSITY RESEARCH: A META-ANALYTIC REVIEW" 52 (52): 599-627, 200906

    57 Mohammed, S, "Surfaceand deep-level diversity in workgroups: Examining the moderating effects of team orientation and team process on relationship conflict" 25 (25): 1015-1039, 2004

    58 Gaunt,R, "Superordinate categorization as a moderator of mutual infrahumanization" 12 (12): 731-746, 2009

    59 Olson, B. J., "Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes" 33 : 196-222, 2007

    60 Jackson, S. E., "Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotion, and turnover" 76 : 675-689, 1991

    61 Tajfel,H, "Social identity and intergroup relations" Cambridge University Press 1982

    62 Hogg, M. A, "Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes" Routledge 1988

    63 Scott,S.G, "Social identification effects in product and process development teams" 14 (14): 97-127, 1997

    64 Levine, J. M., "Social foundation of cognition" 14 : 319-340, 1993

    65 Lawler, E. J., "Social exchange and micro social order" 73 : 519-542, 2008

    66 Judge, T. A, "Social context of performance evaluation decisions" 36 : 80-106, 1993

    67 Orr,J.E, "Sharing knowledge, celebrating identity: Community memory in a service culture In Collective Remembering" Sage Publications 169-189, 1990

    68 Chou, L., "Shared work value and team member effectiveness: The meditation of trustfulness and trustworthiness" 61 (61): 1713-1742, 2008

    69 Cannon-Bowers, J. A., "Shared mental model in expert team decision making In Individual and Group Decision Makings" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 221-246, 1993

    70 Milliken, F. J, "Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity of in organizational groups" 21 (21): 402-433, 1996

    71 Mathieu, J. E., "Scaling the quality of teammates' mental models: Equifinality and normative comparisons" 26 : 37-56, 2005

    72 Wharton, A. S, "Satisfaction? The psychological impact of sex segregation on women at work" 32 : 365-387, 1991

    73 Bourdieu. P, "Reproduction in education" society and culture 1973

    74 Barrick, M. R., "Relating member ability and personality to work-team processes and team effectiveness" 83 : 377-391, 1998

    75 Cannon-Bowers, J. A., "Reflection on shared cognition" 22 : 195-202, 2001

    76 Gaertner, S. L, "Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. Philadelphia: Psychology"

    77 Timmerman,T, "Racial diversity, age diversity, interdependence, and team performance" 31 (31): 592-606, 2000

    78 Edmondson,A.C, "Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams" 44 : 350-383, 1999

    79 Levine, J. M, "Progress in small group research" 41 : 585-634, 1990

    80 van Offenbeek,M, "Processes and outcomes of team learning" 10 (10): 303-317, 2001

    81 Lawler, E. J, "Power and the emergence of commitment behavior in negotiated exchange" 58 : 465-481, 1993

    82 van Vianen, A. E. M, "Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance" 10 (10): 97-120, 2001

    83 Marks, M. A., "Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments" 85 : 871-986, 2000

    84 Hinds, P. J, "Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams" 14 (14): 615-632, 2003

    85 Argyris, C, "Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective" Addison-Wesley 1978

    86 Zenger, T. R, "Organizational demography: The differential effects of age and tenure distributions on technical communication" 32 : 353-376, 1989

    87 Wiersema, M. F, "Organizational demography in Japanese firms: Group heterogeneity, individual dissimilarity, and top management team turnover" 36 : 996-1025, 1993

    88 Wagner, W. G., "Organizational demography and turnover in top-management groups" 29 : 74-92, 1984

    89 Pfeffer,J, "Organizational demography In Research in Organizational Behavior, 5" JAI Press 299-357, 1983

    90 Jehn, K. A., "Opening pandora’s box: A field study of diversity, conflict and performance in work group, Working paper" Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania 1997

    91 Lawler, E. J, "Network structure and emotion in exchange relations" 63 : 871-894, 1998

    92 Kanter,R.M, "Men and women of the corporation" Basic Books 1977

    93 Shapcott, K. M., "Member diversity and cohesion and performance in working groups" 37 (37): 701-720, 2006

    94 Allison,P.D, "Measures of Inequality" 43 : 865-880, 1978

    95 Homan, A. C., "Managing group diversity beliefs to increase performance in diverse teams: Promotion diversity helps" 2004

    96 Kearney, E, "Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership" 94 (94): 77-89, 2009

    97 Wittenbaum, G, "Management of information in small groups In What’s social about social cognition? Social cognition research in small groups" Sage 3-28, 1996

    98 Simons, T., "Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams" 41 (41): 662-673, 1999

    99 Thomas, D. A, "Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity" 74 : 79-90, 1996

    100 Foldy,E.G, "Learning from diversity: A theoretical exploration" 64 (64): 529-538, 2004

    101 Van Der Vegt, G. S, "Learning and performance on multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification" 48 (48): 532-547, 2005

    102 Baskett,G.D, "Interview decisions as determined by competency and attitude similarity" 57 : 343-345, 1973

    103 Messick, D. M, "Intergroup relations" 40 : 45-81, 1989

    104 Van Hiel, A, "Information exchange in context: Effects of sex composition of group, accountability and intergroup perception on group decision making" 28 (28): 2049-2067, 1998

    105 Blau,P, "Inequality and heterogeneity" Free Press 1977

    106 Tjosvold,D, "Implications of controversy research for management" 11 : 21-37, 1985

    107 Webber, S. S, "Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis" 27 : 141-162, 2001

    108 McGrath,J.E, "Groups: Interaction and performance" Prentice- Hall 1984

    109 Choi,J.N, "Group composition and employee creative behavior in a Korean electronics company: Distinct effects of relational demography and group diversity" 80 : 213-234, 2007

    110 Gruenfeld, D, H., "Group composition and decision making: How member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance" 67 (67): 1-15, 1996

    111 Randel, A. E, "Gender social and personal identity, sex dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and asymmetrical effects" 39 (39): 468-491, 2008

    112 Elfenbein, H. A, "Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance" 32 : 109-142, 2007

    113 Pelled, L. H., "Exploring the back box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance" 44 : 1-28, 1999

    114 Avery, D. R., "Engaging the aging workforce: The relationship between perceived age similarity, satisfaction with coworkers, and employee engagement" 92 (92): 1542-1556, 2007

    115 Martins, L. L, "Effects of gender diversity management on perceptions of organizational attractiveness: The role of individual differences in attitudes and beliefs" 92 (92): 865-875, 2007

    116 Konrad, A. M., "Diversity in work group sex composition: Implications for majority and minority members" 10 : 115-140, 1992

    117 Jackson, S. E, "Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and performance" 25 : 675-702, 2004

    118 Molleman,E, "Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning" 14 : 173-193, 2005

    119 Sessa, V. I, "Diversity in decision-making teams: All differences are not created equal In Diversity in organizations: New perspectives for a changing workplace" Sage 133-156, 1995

    120 Wong,S, "Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions" 15 (15): 645-656, 2004

    121 Williams, K. Y, "Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research In Research in organizational behavior" JAI Press 77-140, 1998

    122 Ancona, D. G, "Demography and design: Predictors of new product team performance" 3 (3): 321-341, 1992

    123 Pelled,L.H, "Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory" 7 (7): 615-631, 1996

    124 Lau, D. C, "Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups" 23 : 325-340, 1998

    125 Tsui, A. S, "Demographic differences in organization: Current research and future directions" Lexington Books 1999

    126 Bell,S.T, "Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A metaanalysis" 92 (92): 595-615, 2007

    127 Cox,T, "Cultural diversity in organizations; Theory, research and practice" Berrett-Koehler 1993

    128 Ely, R. J, "Cultural diversity at work: The effects of diversity perspectives on work group processes and outcomes" 46 : 229-273, 2001

    129 Keller, R. T, "Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes" 44 : 547-555, 2001

    130 Earley, P. C, "Creating hybrid team cultures: An empirical test of transnational team functioning" 43 (43): 26-49, 2000

    131 Brief, A. P., "Community matters: realistic group conflict theory and the impact of diversity" 48 (48): 830-844, 2005

    132 Egan, T. D, "Communication and conflict: The impact of ethnic and sex diversity in management teams" 1992

    133 Lawler, E. J, "Commitment in exchange relations: Test a theory of relational cohesion" 61 : 98-108, 1996

    134 Eby, L. T, "Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis" 18 : 275-295, 1997

    135 Cannon-Bowers, J. A, "Cognitive psychology and team training: shared mental models in complex systems" 1990

    136 Homan, A. C., "Bridging faultlines by valuing diversity: Diversity beliefs, information elaboration, and performance in diverse work groups" 92 (92): 1189-1199, 2007

    137 Brewer, M. B, "Beyond the contact hypothesis: Theoretical perspectives on desegregation In Groups in contact: The psychology of desegregation" Academic 281-302, 1984

    138 Tsui, A. S, "Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demographic in superiorsubordinate dyads" 32 (32): 402-423, 1989

    139 Harrison, D. A., "Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface-and deeplevel diversity on work group cohesion" 41 (41): 96-107, 1998

    140 Tsui, A. S., "Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment" 37 : 549-579, 1992

    141 Marks, M. A., "A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes" 26 (26): 356-376, 2001

    142 Pearce, C. L, "A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs)" 25 : 259-278, 2004

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼