RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    선호도 유창성의 요인과 긍정적 행동의도에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856910

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Understanding the factors that determine whether consumers choose options or not is critical for developing marketing strategy. When consumer preferences are constructed in the process of making a choice, different contexts and tasks lead to different aspects of the option. The preference construction are sensitive to the ease or difficulty with which the informations are processed. The author examines how the preference fluency that is defined as the subjective feeling of ease or difficulty experienced while making a decision affects the consumers` positively behaving intents such as purchasing intention and positive words of mouth, and focuses on metacognitive experiences that occur at the process of constructing preferences. Responses to new informations may depend on metacognitive feeling of the ease or difficulty with which consumers perceive or understand the informations. Sources of fluency experiences arise from the ease with which externally presented stimuli are processed. The processing fluency may be conceptual or perceptual in nature. The ease with which consumers can identify a target stimulus on subsequent encounters and involves the processing of physical features, such as modality and shape(Jacoby and Dallas 1981). Conceptual fluency reflects the ease with which the target comes to minds and pertains to the processing of meanings(Lee and Labroo 2004). The two types of processing fluency are distinctive. The few studies that examine the effects of conceptual and perceptual fluency focus more on how they affect the perference fluency than on how they do evaluation. The objectives of this research are to explore the mediating roles of preference fluency between the processing fluency and positively behaving intents. Perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency are distinctive constructs that have unique components different from each other. But their roles in fluency-based preference construction are less clear. By reviewing the theoretical background of processing fluency the components of each fluency have been explored to develop the questionnaire to test the relationship between conceptual fluency and preference fluency, and between perceptual fluency and preference fluency. And to explore the relationship between preference fluency and positively behaving intents, this article extends roles of processing fluency to the functions toward the preference fluency to verify the roles mediating between processing fluency and positively behaving intents. Taken together, the hypotheses that indicate preference fluency are mediator between processing fluency and positively behaving intents are developed. Four types of scenarios and advertisements are concerned with two high and low processing fluencies. The hypotheses are tested by using Amos18. The results of testing hypotheses show the mediating roles of preference fluency on the effects of perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency on positively behaving intents such as purchasing intents and positive words of mouth. And there are no direct effects of each processing fluency on the intents. A key finding from preceding studies on preference construction is that preferences vary across situations and time, option-framing, choice contexts. To the extent that positively behaving intents vary in the mode of presentation and consumers vary across contexts and time in their ability to construct preference about a particular brand, preference fluency are the major factor that marketer must give attention on. To improve preference fluency many variables present in consumer environment, such as cognitive load, concreteness of presentations, exposure frequency, meaning of consuming brand, relationship between the meaning and consumption goal, etc. should be considered and rearranged.
    번역하기

    Understanding the factors that determine whether consumers choose options or not is critical for developing marketing strategy. When consumer preferences are constructed in the process of making a choice, different contexts and tasks lead to different...

    Understanding the factors that determine whether consumers choose options or not is critical for developing marketing strategy. When consumer preferences are constructed in the process of making a choice, different contexts and tasks lead to different aspects of the option. The preference construction are sensitive to the ease or difficulty with which the informations are processed. The author examines how the preference fluency that is defined as the subjective feeling of ease or difficulty experienced while making a decision affects the consumers` positively behaving intents such as purchasing intention and positive words of mouth, and focuses on metacognitive experiences that occur at the process of constructing preferences. Responses to new informations may depend on metacognitive feeling of the ease or difficulty with which consumers perceive or understand the informations. Sources of fluency experiences arise from the ease with which externally presented stimuli are processed. The processing fluency may be conceptual or perceptual in nature. The ease with which consumers can identify a target stimulus on subsequent encounters and involves the processing of physical features, such as modality and shape(Jacoby and Dallas 1981). Conceptual fluency reflects the ease with which the target comes to minds and pertains to the processing of meanings(Lee and Labroo 2004). The two types of processing fluency are distinctive. The few studies that examine the effects of conceptual and perceptual fluency focus more on how they affect the perference fluency than on how they do evaluation. The objectives of this research are to explore the mediating roles of preference fluency between the processing fluency and positively behaving intents. Perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency are distinctive constructs that have unique components different from each other. But their roles in fluency-based preference construction are less clear. By reviewing the theoretical background of processing fluency the components of each fluency have been explored to develop the questionnaire to test the relationship between conceptual fluency and preference fluency, and between perceptual fluency and preference fluency. And to explore the relationship between preference fluency and positively behaving intents, this article extends roles of processing fluency to the functions toward the preference fluency to verify the roles mediating between processing fluency and positively behaving intents. Taken together, the hypotheses that indicate preference fluency are mediator between processing fluency and positively behaving intents are developed. Four types of scenarios and advertisements are concerned with two high and low processing fluencies. The hypotheses are tested by using Amos18. The results of testing hypotheses show the mediating roles of preference fluency on the effects of perceptual fluency and conceptual fluency on positively behaving intents such as purchasing intents and positive words of mouth. And there are no direct effects of each processing fluency on the intents. A key finding from preceding studies on preference construction is that preferences vary across situations and time, option-framing, choice contexts. To the extent that positively behaving intents vary in the mode of presentation and consumers vary across contexts and time in their ability to construct preference about a particular brand, preference fluency are the major factor that marketer must give attention on. To improve preference fluency many variables present in consumer environment, such as cognitive load, concreteness of presentations, exposure frequency, meaning of consuming brand, relationship between the meaning and consumption goal, etc. should be considered and rearranged.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 안광호, "소비자-기업 동일시가 소비자의 제품평가와 행위적 반응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅학회 19 (19): 55-78, 2004

    2 Keller, Punam Anand, "Vividness Effects:A Resource-Matching Perspective" 24 (24): 295-304, 1997

    3 Rokeach,Milton, "The Nature of Human Values" Free Press 1973

    4 Lee,Angela Y, "The Mere Exposure Effect:An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited" 27 (27): 1255-1266, 2001

    5 Seamon, John G., "The Mere Exposure Effect Is Based on Implicit Memory: Effects of Stimulus Type, Encoding Conditions, and Number of Exposures on Recognition and Affect Judgments" 21 (21): 711-721, 1995

    6 Markman, Arthur B, "The Influence of Goals on Value and Choice, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 39" Academic Press 97-128, 2000

    7 LeDoux,J.E, "The Emotional Brain" Simon & Schuster 1996

    8 Dhar, Ravi, "The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice" 40 : 146-160, 2003

    9 Lee, Angela Y, "The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation" 41 (41): 151-165, 2004

    10 Rook,Dennis W, "The Buying Impulse" 14 (14): 189-199, 1987

    1 안광호, "소비자-기업 동일시가 소비자의 제품평가와 행위적 반응에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국마케팅학회 19 (19): 55-78, 2004

    2 Keller, Punam Anand, "Vividness Effects:A Resource-Matching Perspective" 24 (24): 295-304, 1997

    3 Rokeach,Milton, "The Nature of Human Values" Free Press 1973

    4 Lee,Angela Y, "The Mere Exposure Effect:An Uncertainty Reduction Explanation Revisited" 27 (27): 1255-1266, 2001

    5 Seamon, John G., "The Mere Exposure Effect Is Based on Implicit Memory: Effects of Stimulus Type, Encoding Conditions, and Number of Exposures on Recognition and Affect Judgments" 21 (21): 711-721, 1995

    6 Markman, Arthur B, "The Influence of Goals on Value and Choice, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 39" Academic Press 97-128, 2000

    7 LeDoux,J.E, "The Emotional Brain" Simon & Schuster 1996

    8 Dhar, Ravi, "The Effect of Forced Choice on Choice" 40 : 146-160, 2003

    9 Lee, Angela Y, "The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation" 41 (41): 151-165, 2004

    10 Rook,Dennis W, "The Buying Impulse" 14 (14): 189-199, 1987

    11 Higgins,E.Tory, "The Aboutness Principle:A Pervasive Influence on Human Inference" 16 (16): 173-198, 1998

    12 Baumeister, Roy F, "Self-Regulation Failure:An Overview" 7 (7): 1-15, 1996

    13 Nedungadi,Prakash, "Recall and Consumer Consideration Sets:Influencing Choice Without Altering Brand Evaluation" 17 (17): 263-276, 1990

    14 Tulving, Endel, "Priming and Human Memory System" 247 (247): 301-306, 1990

    15 Novemsky, N., "Preference fluency in choice" 44 (44): 347-356, 2007

    16 Shapiro, Stewart, "Preattentive Processing: Its Effects on the Formation of Consideration Sets" 24 (24): 94-104, 1997

    17 Anand, Punam, "Perceptual Fluency and Affect Without Recognition" 19 (19): 293-300, 1991

    18 Carver, Charles S, "On the Self-Regulation of Behavior" Cambridge University Press 1998

    19 Jacoby, Larry L, "On the Relationship Between Autobiographical Memory and Perceptual Learning" 110 (110): 306-340, 1981

    20 Hair. J. F. Jr., "Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed" Prentice- Hall International 2006

    21 Winkielman, Piotr, "Mind at Ease Puts a Smile on the Face: Psychophysiological Evidence that Processing Facilitation Elicits Positive Affect" 81 (81): 989-1000, 2001

    22 Schwarz.Herbert Bless, "Meta-Cognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making" 14 (14): 332-348, 2004

    23 Hamann,Stephan B, "Level-of-Processing Effects in Conceptuallly Driven Implicit Tasks" 16 : 970-977, 1990

    24 Whittlesea,Bruce W.A, "Illusions of Familiarity" 19 (19): 1235-1253, 1992

    25 Aaker, Jennifer L, "I Seek Pleasures and ‘We’ Avoid Pains: The Role of Self Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion" 28 : 33-49, 2001

    26 Nisbett, Richard, "Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment" Prentice-Hall 1980

    27 Kruglanski,Arie W, "Goals as Knowledge Structures in The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior" Guilford Press 599-618, 1996

    28 Bagozzi, Richard P, "Goal-Setting and Goal-Striving in Consumer Behavior" 63 (63): 19-32, 1999

    29 Austin, J. T., "Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content" 120 (120): 338-375, 1996

    30 Pervin,Lawrence A, "Goal Concepts: Themes, Issues, and Questions,” in Goal Concepts in Personality and Social Psychology" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 473-479, 1989

    31 Haddock, Geoffrey, "Forming Judgements of Attitude Certainty, Importance and Intensity: The Role of Subjective Experiences" 25 : 771-782, 1999

    32 Shah, James Y., "Forgetting All Eles:On the Antecedents and Consequences of Goal Shielding" 83 (83): 1261-1280, 2002

    33 Bornstein,Robert F, "Exposure and Affect:Overview and Meta-Analysis of Research,1968-1987" 106 : 265-289, 1989

    34 Luce, Mary Frances, "Emotional Trade-Off Difficulty and Choice" 36 (36): 143-159, 1999

    35 Babin, Laurie A, "Effects of Print Ad Pictures and Copy Containing Instructions to Imagine on Mental Imagery That Mediates Attitudes" 26 (26): 33-44, 1997

    36 Reber, Rolf, "Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth" 8 (8): 338-342, 1999

    37 Reber, Piotr Winkielman, "Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments" 9 (9): 45-48, 1998

    38 Lee,Angela Y, "Effects of Implicit Memory on Memory-based Versus Stimulus-Based Brand Choice" 39 (39): 440-454, 2002

    39 Tormala, Z. L., "Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: A Self-Validation Analysis" 28 : 1700-1712, 2002

    40 Schwarz, Herbert Bless, "Ease of Retrieval as Information:Another Look at the Availability Heuristic" 61 (61): 195-202, 1991

    41 Kisielius, Jolita, "Detecting and Explaining Vividness Effects in Attitudinal Judgments" 21 (21): 54-64, 1984

    42 Lurie,Nicholas H, "Decision Making in Information-Rich Environments:The Role of Information Structure" 30 (30): 473-486, 2004

    43 Huffman, Cynthia, "Consumer Goal Structures and Goal Determination Process: An Integrative Framework, in The why of Consumption: Contemporary Perspectives on Consumer Motives Goals, and Desire" Routledge 9-35, 2000

    44 Winkielman, Piotr, "Cognitive and Affective Consequences of Visual Fluency: When Seeing Is Easy on the Mind, in Persuasive Imagery: A Consumer Response Perspective" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 75-89, 2003

    45 Clore,Gerald L, "Cognitive Phenomenology: Feelings and the Construction of Judgment, in The Construction of Social Judgments" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 133-164, 1992

    46 Keller,Kevin L, "Brand Synthesis:The Multidimensionality of Brand Knowledge" 29 (29): 595-600, 2003

    47 Higgins,E.Tory, "Beyond pleasure and Pain" 52 (52): 1280-1300, 1997

    48 Labroo, Aparna A, "Between Two Brands:A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation" 43 (43): 374-385, 2006

    49 Payne, John, "Behavioral Decision Research:A Constructive Processing Perspective" 43 : 87-131, 1992

    50 Fitzsimons, Gráinne M., "Automatic Effects of Brand Exposure on Motivated Behavior:How Apple Makes You 'Think Different'" 34 : 21-35, 2008

    51 Chartrand, Tanya L, "Automatic Activation of Impression Formation and Memorization Goals: Nonconscious Goal Priming Reproduces Effects of Explicit Task Instructions" 71 : 464-478, 1996

    52 Bargh,John A, "Auto-Motives: Preconscious Determinants of Thought and Behavior, in Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2" Guilford 93-130, 1990

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼