RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    선진 기업복지프로그램이 한국 기업복지제도에 제시하는 대안에 관한 연구

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    It would appear that there is some similarities between the Korean occupational welfare system and the that of the advanced industrial nations. Each system seems to be considered by an integral part in it`s business community and the future prospects seem promising. However, similarities end there. The former enjoys an popularity as a result of it`s successful performance while the latter holds unwarranted popularity, for there are substantial amount of indications that it does not fulfill it`s proper function . The systematic study undertaken by the Korea Labor Institute in 1995 revealed a number of serious defects in the occupational welfare system in the Korean
    industry in it`s function of profit-making. With a view to find reasons of the impotency and solutions, theories of occupational welfare and experiences of occupational welfare in the Western nations were throughly examined in order to come up with basic characteristics of occupational welfare. Four factors notably, degree of complement, efficiency, professionalization, and effectiveness were derived to used as an analytical framework. As consequences, the Korean occupational welfare system was turned out to have serious deficiencies in all four aspects. As for alternatives to be used for the purpose of remedy current structural problems, employee assistance program(EAP) which may address the problem with respect to degree of professionalization and efficiency. Cafeteria
    plan(flexible benefit plan) that may redress the problem of degree of compensation and effectiveness were also suggested as a viable alternative.
    번역하기

    It would appear that there is some similarities between the Korean occupational welfare system and the that of the advanced industrial nations. Each system seems to be considered by an integral part in it`s business community and the future prospects ...

    It would appear that there is some similarities between the Korean occupational welfare system and the that of the advanced industrial nations. Each system seems to be considered by an integral part in it`s business community and the future prospects seem promising. However, similarities end there. The former enjoys an popularity as a result of it`s successful performance while the latter holds unwarranted popularity, for there are substantial amount of indications that it does not fulfill it`s proper function . The systematic study undertaken by the Korea Labor Institute in 1995 revealed a number of serious defects in the occupational welfare system in the Korean
    industry in it`s function of profit-making. With a view to find reasons of the impotency and solutions, theories of occupational welfare and experiences of occupational welfare in the Western nations were throughly examined in order to come up with basic characteristics of occupational welfare. Four factors notably, degree of complement, efficiency, professionalization, and effectiveness were derived to used as an analytical framework. As consequences, the Korean occupational welfare system was turned out to have serious deficiencies in all four aspects. As for alternatives to be used for the purpose of remedy current structural problems, employee assistance program(EAP) which may address the problem with respect to degree of professionalization and efficiency. Cafeteria
    plan(flexible benefit plan) that may redress the problem of degree of compensation and effectiveness were also suggested as a viable alternative.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼