RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    五四와 文革 ― 중국혁명의 상징체계 = The May Fourth & The Cultural Revolution: A Symbolism of The Chinese Revolution

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104458637

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study briefly examined the process how the evaluative perspective of ‘5⋅4’ developed in the discourse of Chinese Revolution and discussed how ‘5⋅4’ and ‘the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution(GPCR)’ became a mutually regulating system of political symbolism for China's history of revolutions in the 20th Century and the underlying logic. The purpose of the study was to suggest why it is necessary to critically reconsider the logic underlying the narrative of China's revolutions in the 20th Century.
    The 'narrative of enlightenment' in the 80s where the complicated process of historical development was reenacted under an exclusively dualized structure of ‘5⋅4 vs. the GPCR’ was a kind of symbolic reenactment of history. This ‘narrative of enlightenment’ attempted to arrange ‘enlightenment’ and ‘the GPCR’ in a row and resolve all ideological chances of the GPCR through the value of enlightenment. Considering the modernity of Chinese socialism, the GPCR implied a modern political factor of ‘rebel of the masses (Zaofan, 造反)’ which had not been found in the another socialist history. In a meaning, therefore, the GPCR was already the greatest enlightenment. Likewise, the radicalism of the GPCR attempted to remove the values of enlightenment and cultural innovation underlying the 5⋅4 Movement through ‘the discourse of Youth Day,’ but once they are removed, the modernity of Chinese socialism had to be an empty shell.
    The primary issue encountered by the study of Chinese contemporary literature today is the limitation of the ‘narrative of enlightenment’ in the 80s. However, the root of the ‘narrative of the 80s’ reaches out to the narrative of the time of the GPCR.
    Therefore, overcoming the narrative of the 80s can essentially be achieved only when the core issues of the GPCR are reinterpreted and reflected upon in the context of the present day. This is a more essential issue of the Chinese intellectual history.
    What is required first to resolve these ideological assignments would be a critical awareness and dissolution of the symbolism of ‘5⋅4 vs. the GPCR' that is secretly working in the isolated and exclusive description of the Great Cultural Revolution and the 80s.
    번역하기

    This study briefly examined the process how the evaluative perspective of ‘5⋅4’ developed in the discourse of Chinese Revolution and discussed how ‘5⋅4’ and ‘the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution(GPCR)’ became a mutually regulating...

    This study briefly examined the process how the evaluative perspective of ‘5⋅4’ developed in the discourse of Chinese Revolution and discussed how ‘5⋅4’ and ‘the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution(GPCR)’ became a mutually regulating system of political symbolism for China's history of revolutions in the 20th Century and the underlying logic. The purpose of the study was to suggest why it is necessary to critically reconsider the logic underlying the narrative of China's revolutions in the 20th Century.
    The 'narrative of enlightenment' in the 80s where the complicated process of historical development was reenacted under an exclusively dualized structure of ‘5⋅4 vs. the GPCR’ was a kind of symbolic reenactment of history. This ‘narrative of enlightenment’ attempted to arrange ‘enlightenment’ and ‘the GPCR’ in a row and resolve all ideological chances of the GPCR through the value of enlightenment. Considering the modernity of Chinese socialism, the GPCR implied a modern political factor of ‘rebel of the masses (Zaofan, 造反)’ which had not been found in the another socialist history. In a meaning, therefore, the GPCR was already the greatest enlightenment. Likewise, the radicalism of the GPCR attempted to remove the values of enlightenment and cultural innovation underlying the 5⋅4 Movement through ‘the discourse of Youth Day,’ but once they are removed, the modernity of Chinese socialism had to be an empty shell.
    The primary issue encountered by the study of Chinese contemporary literature today is the limitation of the ‘narrative of enlightenment’ in the 80s. However, the root of the ‘narrative of the 80s’ reaches out to the narrative of the time of the GPCR.
    Therefore, overcoming the narrative of the 80s can essentially be achieved only when the core issues of the GPCR are reinterpreted and reflected upon in the context of the present day. This is a more essential issue of the Chinese intellectual history.
    What is required first to resolve these ideological assignments would be a critical awareness and dissolution of the symbolism of ‘5⋅4 vs. the GPCR' that is secretly working in the isolated and exclusive description of the Great Cultural Revolution and the 80s.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "「五四運動五十年」, 『人民日報』⋅『紅旗』雜志⋅『解放軍報』(社論)"

    2 이택후, "중국현대사상사의 굴절" 지식산업사 1992

    3 추이즈위앤, "중국은 어디로 가고 있는가" 창비 2003

    4 천쓰허, "중국당대문학사" 문학동네 2008

    5 백승욱, "중국 문화대혁명과 정치의 아포리아" 그린비 2012

    6 중국공산당 중앙문헌연구실, "정통 중국현대사 ― 중국공산당의 역사문제에 관한 결의" 사계절 1990

    7 첸카이거, "어느 영화감독의 청춘-나의 홍위병 시절" 푸른산 1991

    8 다이호우잉, "사람아 아, 사람아!" 다섯수레 1991

    9 老鬼, "불타는 영혼 (1-3)" 친구 1992

    10 천이난, "문화대혁명:또 다른 기억" 그린비 2008

    1 "「五四運動五十年」, 『人民日報』⋅『紅旗』雜志⋅『解放軍報』(社論)"

    2 이택후, "중국현대사상사의 굴절" 지식산업사 1992

    3 추이즈위앤, "중국은 어디로 가고 있는가" 창비 2003

    4 천쓰허, "중국당대문학사" 문학동네 2008

    5 백승욱, "중국 문화대혁명과 정치의 아포리아" 그린비 2012

    6 중국공산당 중앙문헌연구실, "정통 중국현대사 ― 중국공산당의 역사문제에 관한 결의" 사계절 1990

    7 첸카이거, "어느 영화감독의 청춘-나의 홍위병 시절" 푸른산 1991

    8 다이호우잉, "사람아 아, 사람아!" 다섯수레 1991

    9 老鬼, "불타는 영혼 (1-3)" 친구 1992

    10 천이난, "문화대혁명:또 다른 기억" 그린비 2008

    11 자크 랑시에르, "문학의 정치" 인간사랑 2009

    12 "青年要精通業務掌握科學技術 ― 迎五四青年節"

    13 許子東, "重讀‘文革’" 人民文學出版社 2011

    14 "重溫曆史, 堅定信心 ― 紀念“五四”六十二周年"

    15 鄧小平, "鄧小平文選』(2冊)" 人民出版社 1983

    16 "這是青年們發出更大的光和熱的時候"

    17 華國鋒, "解放思想,走自己的道路 ― 紀念五四運動六十周年" 三聯書店 1979

    18 "解放思想,走自己的道路 ― 紀念五四運動六十周年"

    19 "肩負起跨世紀的曆史重任 ― 紀念五四運動七十五周年"

    20 "肩負起走向二十一世紀的曆史重任—紀念共青團七十周年和五四運動七十 三周年"

    21 印紅標, "紅衛兵‘破四舊’的文化與政治"

    22 "紀念五四運動五十五周年"

    23 "知識青年要和工農群眾變成一體"

    24 "知識青年必須同工農相結合"

    25 "發揚革命精神和科學精神"

    26 "發揚優良傳統 青春奉獻中華 ― 紀念五四運動71周年"

    27 "發揚五四精神,推進改革和現代化事業"

    28 "發揚“五四”傳統, 走在新長征的前列"

    29 "當代青年的曆史使命 ― 祝賀中國共產主義青年團第十三次全國代表大會 召開"

    30 "當代青年的曆史使命"

    31 "用具體切實的方法培養和教育青年"

    32 陳冀德, "生逢其時" 時代國際出版有限公司 2008

    33 "爲著社會主義而勞動! ― 紀念“五四”青年節"

    34 "爲宏偉目標獻青春 ― 紀念五四運動七十二周年"

    35 "永遠跟黨走 ― 紀念中國共產主義青年團建團80周年"

    36 曹征路, "民主課" 臺灣社會研究雜誌社 2013

    37 毛澤東, "毛澤東選集(5冊)" 人民出版社 1991

    38 "更好地培養青年一代"

    39 蔡翔, "文革與敘事 ― 關於文革研究的對話" 4 : 2002

    40 譚放, "文革大字報精選" 明鏡出版社 1996

    41 宋永毅, "文化大革命和它的異端思潮" 田園書屋 1997

    42 "推动中国历史进步的不朽丰碑― 一论让五四精神放射出更加夺目的时代光芒"

    43 "把革命的火炬一代代地傳下去 ― 紀念“五四”青年節"

    44 "把握最基本最重要的历史结论― 二论让五四精神放射出更加夺目的时代光芒"

    45 "承前啟後, 繼往開來 ― 紀念五四運動八十周年"

    46 "我与祖国共奋进 ― 庆祝五四青年节"

    47 "弘揚五四精神 肩負曆史使命 ― 紀念五四運動85周年"

    48 中共中央文獻硏究室, "建國以來毛澤東文稿(13冊)" 中央文獻出版社 1998

    49 "奮發進取, 建功立業"

    50 印紅標, "失蹤者的足跡: 文化大革命時期的靑年思潮" 中文大學出版社 2009

    51 "坚持实现民族复兴的正确道路― 三论让五四精神放射出更加夺目的时代光芒"

    52 "在改革開放中造就一代新人 ― 熱烈祝賀共青團第12次全國代表大會召開" 1988

    53 "在伟大的变革中展现青春风采― 四论让五四精神放射出更加夺目的时代光芒"

    54 "向科學進軍的正確道路"

    55 曹征路, "反思不是妖魔化: 和曹征路談『民主課』(訪談錄)(深圳, 2011 年10月)"

    56 "又紅又專 後來居上"

    57 "創造更加美好的未來 ― 紀念五四運動六十五周年"

    58 "共奋进⋅齐奋斗⋅同发展― 纪念“五四”青年节和中国共青团成立85周年"

    59 "充分發揮青年的社會主義積極性 ― 紀念“五四”中國青年節"

    60 "书写无愧于时代的辉煌篇章― 五论让五四精神放射出更加夺目的时代光芒"

    61 "为民族复兴奏响青春乐章― 纪念五四运动90周年"

    62 北京大學, "中國現代文學史參考資料 ― 文學運動史料選(五冊)" 上海 敎育出版社 1979

    63 編輯委員會, "中國新文學大系 1949-1976(20冊)" 上海文藝出版 1997

    64 "一代一代地繼承和發揚黨的革命傳統"

    65 王堯, "“文革”对“五四”及“现代文艺”的叙述与阐释" 1 : 2002

    66 中國人民解放軍, "‘文化大革命’硏究資 料(總8冊)" 未發刊 內部資料 1988

    67 宋永毅, "The Chinese Cultural Revolution Database (CD-ROM), 中國文化大革命文庫光碟"

    68 진사화, "20세기 중국문학의 이해" 청년사 1995

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.44 0.44 0.36
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.37 0.34 0.589 0.43
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼