RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    CSCL에서 완성하기 과제의 소거 수준과 자신에게 설명하기 활동의 제공 방식이 협력부하 및 협력학습성과에 미치는 영향 = The Effects of Completion Level of Learning Task and Self-Explanation Strategies on Collaboration Load and Collaboration Outcomes in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101959541

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of completion level of learning task and self-explanation strategies on collaboration load and collaboration outcomes in CSCL. This study assumed that the higher completion level of the learning task is, the more effectively it would further control extraneous collaboration load and thereby positively impact on team performance. In addition, it aimed to examine that coercing self-explanation activities in accordance with predefined processes would reduce extraneous collaboration load and improve collaboration outcome. Participants drawn from a pool of 56 undergraduate students sampled for the study. They were randomly assigned into one of four groups. According to the findings, the script with structured self-explanation activities group invested significantly lower mental effort than script with ill-structured self-explanation activities group in the collaborative learning process. Thus, regardless of completion level of learning task, the script with structured self-explanation activities is thought to play a significant roles to help learners optimize collaboration load. Regarding the collaboration outcome, the completion level ‘high’ of learning task showed positive effects on joint outcome. Based on these findings, it was concluded that presenting learners with completion task where many parts were eliminated prior to problem solving increase the quality of joint outcome.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of completion level of learning task and self-explanation strategies on collaboration load and collaboration outcomes in CSCL. This study assumed that the higher completion level of the learning...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of completion level of learning task and self-explanation strategies on collaboration load and collaboration outcomes in CSCL. This study assumed that the higher completion level of the learning task is, the more effectively it would further control extraneous collaboration load and thereby positively impact on team performance. In addition, it aimed to examine that coercing self-explanation activities in accordance with predefined processes would reduce extraneous collaboration load and improve collaboration outcome. Participants drawn from a pool of 56 undergraduate students sampled for the study. They were randomly assigned into one of four groups. According to the findings, the script with structured self-explanation activities group invested significantly lower mental effort than script with ill-structured self-explanation activities group in the collaborative learning process. Thus, regardless of completion level of learning task, the script with structured self-explanation activities is thought to play a significant roles to help learners optimize collaboration load. Regarding the collaboration outcome, the completion level ‘high’ of learning task showed positive effects on joint outcome. Based on these findings, it was concluded that presenting learners with completion task where many parts were eliminated prior to problem solving increase the quality of joint outcome.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정효정, "컴퓨터 기반 협력학습에서의 협력부하 측정을 위한 구인의 탐색 및 타당화 연구" 한국교육공학회 28 (28): 619-640, 2012

    2 정효정, "컴퓨터 기반 협력 스크립트에서 협력모형의 제공 유형이 협력부하와 학습성과에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 105-124, 2010

    3 류지헌, "인지 부하 측정을 위한 구인의 탐색 및 타당화" 한국교육정보미디어학회 15 (15): 1-27, 2009

    4 선종삼, "위키기반 CSCL에서 그라운딩 지원도구의 설계기반연구" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 149-186, 2010

    5 김경연, "반성적 저널 쓰기 과제에서 질문프롬프트의 제공여부와 메타인지가 지식의 구조에 미치는 효과" 안암교육학회 13 (13): 257-280, 2007

    6 류지헌, "멀티미디어 학습자료 설계를 위한 인지부하 설문의 민감도 분석 및 학습 성취에 대한 예언변수 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 17 (17): 309-332, 2011

    7 류지헌, "과제수행에 대한 사전지식 및 인지부하요인의 경로분석" 교과교육연구소 13 (13): 851-871, 2009

    8 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "van Merriënboer의 교수설계이론" 아카데미프레스 2007

    9 Reiser, B. J., "Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners" 255-264, 2002

    10 Tabachnick, B. G., "Using Multivariate Statistics" Pearson 2007

    1 정효정, "컴퓨터 기반 협력학습에서의 협력부하 측정을 위한 구인의 탐색 및 타당화 연구" 한국교육공학회 28 (28): 619-640, 2012

    2 정효정, "컴퓨터 기반 협력 스크립트에서 협력모형의 제공 유형이 협력부하와 학습성과에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 105-124, 2010

    3 류지헌, "인지 부하 측정을 위한 구인의 탐색 및 타당화" 한국교육정보미디어학회 15 (15): 1-27, 2009

    4 선종삼, "위키기반 CSCL에서 그라운딩 지원도구의 설계기반연구" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 149-186, 2010

    5 김경연, "반성적 저널 쓰기 과제에서 질문프롬프트의 제공여부와 메타인지가 지식의 구조에 미치는 효과" 안암교육학회 13 (13): 257-280, 2007

    6 류지헌, "멀티미디어 학습자료 설계를 위한 인지부하 설문의 민감도 분석 및 학습 성취에 대한 예언변수 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 17 (17): 309-332, 2011

    7 류지헌, "과제수행에 대한 사전지식 및 인지부하요인의 경로분석" 교과교육연구소 13 (13): 851-871, 2009

    8 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "van Merriënboer의 교수설계이론" 아카데미프레스 2007

    9 Reiser, B. J., "Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners" 255-264, 2002

    10 Tabachnick, B. G., "Using Multivariate Statistics" Pearson 2007

    11 Paas, F. G. W. C., "Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics : A cognitive load approach" 84 (84): 429-434, 1992

    12 Lee, M., "The effects of the collaborative representation supporting tool on problem-solving processes and outcomes in web-based collaborative problem-based learning(PBL)environments" 16 (16): 273-393, 2005

    13 Kissane, M., "The consequences of fading instructional guidance on delayed performance : The case of financial services training" 28 (28): 809-822, 2008

    14 Lee, E. Y., "Students assessing their own collaborative knowledge building" 1 (1): 57-87, 2006

    15 Renkl, A., "Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition : A cognitive load perspective" 38 (38): 15-22, 2003

    16 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "Strategies for programming instruction in high school : Program completion vs. program generation" 6 (6): 265-287, 1990

    17 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "Strategies for computer-based programming instruction : Program completion vs. program generation" 8 (8): 365-394, 1992

    18 King, A., "Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective, In Scripting computer-supported collaborative learning" Springer 13-37, 2007

    19 Schellens, T., "Scripting by assigning roles: Does it improve knowledge construction in asynchronous discussion groups?" 2 (2): 225-246, 2007

    20 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "Redirecting learners’ attention during training : Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency" 12 (12): 11-37, 2002

    21 Rummel, N., "Learning to collaborate from being scripted or from observing a model" 4 (4): 69-92, 2009

    22 Rummel, N., "Learning to collaborate : an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings" 14 (14): 201-241, 2005

    23 Renkl, A., "Learning from worked-out examples and problem solving, In Cognitive load theory" Cambridge University Press 91-108, 2010

    24 Renkl, A., "Learning from worked-out examples : The effects of example variability and elicited self-explanations" 23 (23): 90-108, 1998

    25 Renkl, A., "Learning from worked-out examples : A study on individual differences" 21 (21): 1-29, 1997

    26 Atkinson, R. K., "Learning from examples : Instructional principles from the worked examples research" 70 (70): 181-214, 2000

    27 Jarvela, S., "Instructional support in CSCL, In What we know about CSCL?" Kluwer Academic Publishers 115-139, 2004

    28 Kester, L., "Instructional control of cognitive load in the design of complex learning environments, In Cognitive load theory" Cambridge University Press 109-130, 2010

    29 Kirschner, F., "Individual and group-based learning from complex cognitive tasks : Effects on retention and transfer efficiency" 25 (25): 306-314, 2009

    30 Gibson, C. B., "From knowledge accumulation to accommodation : cycles of collective cognition in work groups" 22 (22): 121-134, 2001

    31 Butler, D. L., "Feedback and self-regulated learning : a theoretical synthesis" 65 (65): 245-281, 1995

    32 El-Refai, W., "Facilitating web design skills through online design-based learning: the case of collaboration scripts and incomplete concept map" 120-127, 2011

    33 van Bruggen, J. M., "External representations of argumentation in CSCL and the management of cognitive load" 12 (12): 121-138, 2002

    34 Lipponen, L., "Exploring foundations for computer-supported collaborative learning" 72-81, 2002

    35 Cierniak, G., "Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load?" 25 (25): 315-324, 2009

    36 Amadieu, F., "Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning" 19 : 376-386, 2009

    37 Keller, J. M., "Development and use of the ARCS model of instructional design" 10 (10): 2-10, 1987

    38 Roberts, T. S., "Computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education" Idea Group 2005

    39 Scheuer, O., "Computer-supported argumentation : A review of the state of the art" 5 (5): 43-102, 2010

    40 Dillenbourg, P., "Collaboration load, In Handling complexity in learning environments: research and theory" 142-163, 2006

    41 Sweller, J., "Cognitive load theory: recent theoretical advances, In Cognitive load theory" Cambridge University Press 29-47, 2010

    42 Moreno, R., "Cognitive load theory: Historical development and relation to other theories, In Cognitive load theory" Cambridge University Press 9-28, 2010

    43 van Merriënboer, J. J. G., "Cognitive load theory and complex learning : recent developments and future directions" 17 (17): 147-178, 2005

    44 Sweller, J., "Cognitive load theory" Springer 2011

    45 Sweller, J., "Cognitive architecture and instructional design" 10 (10): 251-296, 1998

    46 Beers, P. J., "Coercing knowledge construction in collaborative learning environments" 8-17, 2005

    47 Scardamalia, M., "CSILE/knowledge forum®, In Education and technology: An encyclopedia" ABCCLIO 183-193, 2004

    48 방선희, "CSCL에서 협력적 논증 스캐폴드가 지식공유와 개인의 지식 습득에 미치는 영향" 한국교육공학회 26 (26): 267-306, 2010

    49 윤수정, "CSCL에서 공유 리더십과 질문활용 스캐폴딩이 협력적 문제해결에 미치는 영향" 한국교육학회 45 (45): 115-144, 2007

    50 Burkes, K., "Applying cognitive load theory to the design of online learning" University of North Texas 2007

    51 Kirschner, F., "A cognitive-load approach to collaborative learning : United brains for complex tasks" 21 (21): 31-42, 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 3.7 3.7 3.26
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.89 2.68 3.751 0.75
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼