RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      도덕의 동기와 이기(利己) = Moral Motivation and Self - Interest

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3353784

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Since deontological theories had overridden teleological ones in the field of ethics after Kant, attack on egoism became a sign of departure as a moral philosopher. And, on the viewpoint of utilitarian ethicists, egoism cannot be permitted, either. The ultimate end of normative ethics is to make clear that morality is far-off from pursuit of self-interest and to present how to overcome egoism. The writer of the present paper is much doubtful whether the end would be gained and, moreover, would rather maintain that moral motivation is enforced by consideration of self-interest and that ethical egoism is a desirable theory in moral philosophy.
      The question 'Why be moral?' or 'Why ought we to de what is right?' is old, but not trivial one. We do it: a. in pursuit of self-interest, b. because it is divine command, c. in pursuit of common-interest, d. because it is right. The reason why be moral is decided in a rational way according to what kind of a life he wishes to live or what kind of a person he wishes to be. But, consideration of self interest is the basic reason and, in case of conflict among reasons, the one usually controls the others. Nowell-Smith says that 'I ought' is used to express a verdict or decision and that, therefore, the question 'I ought, but, but will I?' is not arisen. But the case is everywhere that one accepts a moral judgment and cannot do it. Moral motive is a reason of moral judgment but it does not extend to motivation.
      If ethical egoism explains that only egoistic motive is our whole motive of conduct, it is difficult to be supported. We have various sentiments or affections about lots of objects and among them the one is egoistic and the another is altruistic. But, when those motives conflict with one another, the question which is motivated for the sake of gain of the possible maximum amount of happiness remains.
      Consideration of self-interest is the dominative motive of our conduct and morality is based on self-interest if it is to have practical effort. Morality is a mere label.


      번역하기

      Since deontological theories had overridden teleological ones in the field of ethics after Kant, attack on egoism became a sign of departure as a moral philosopher. And, on the viewpoint of utilitarian ethicists, egoism cannot be permitted, either. T...

      Since deontological theories had overridden teleological ones in the field of ethics after Kant, attack on egoism became a sign of departure as a moral philosopher. And, on the viewpoint of utilitarian ethicists, egoism cannot be permitted, either. The ultimate end of normative ethics is to make clear that morality is far-off from pursuit of self-interest and to present how to overcome egoism. The writer of the present paper is much doubtful whether the end would be gained and, moreover, would rather maintain that moral motivation is enforced by consideration of self-interest and that ethical egoism is a desirable theory in moral philosophy.
      The question 'Why be moral?' or 'Why ought we to de what is right?' is old, but not trivial one. We do it: a. in pursuit of self-interest, b. because it is divine command, c. in pursuit of common-interest, d. because it is right. The reason why be moral is decided in a rational way according to what kind of a life he wishes to live or what kind of a person he wishes to be. But, consideration of self interest is the basic reason and, in case of conflict among reasons, the one usually controls the others. Nowell-Smith says that 'I ought' is used to express a verdict or decision and that, therefore, the question 'I ought, but, but will I?' is not arisen. But the case is everywhere that one accepts a moral judgment and cannot do it. Moral motive is a reason of moral judgment but it does not extend to motivation.
      If ethical egoism explains that only egoistic motive is our whole motive of conduct, it is difficult to be supported. We have various sentiments or affections about lots of objects and among them the one is egoistic and the another is altruistic. But, when those motives conflict with one another, the question which is motivated for the sake of gain of the possible maximum amount of happiness remains.
      Consideration of self-interest is the dominative motive of our conduct and morality is based on self-interest if it is to have practical effort. Morality is a mere label.


      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼