RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      불교의 계율에 대한 새로운 이해 - 불교 윤리학을 위한 몇 가지 전제들 - = A New Approach to the Buddhist Precepts in the Modern Society

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104204628

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Traditional Buddhism's perspectives on the role of the precepts are two-fold. On one-hand, the precepts are regarded as the least minimum basic requirement that a person performs to be considered a moral being. On the other hand, precepts are perceived as a temporary method (much like a raft used to cross the river) used to attain nirvana or liberation, the ultimate goal of Buddhism. This dual-nature of the precepts is fundamentally irreconcilable. The dual-natureof the precepts had been used by the early Buddhists to differentiate the moral practices and goals of the lay practitioner from the ordained. The goal of the lay practitioners in performing moral actions and cultivation was to ensure perfection of character within the secular and for practical religious benefits, e.g. the assurance of a good birth in the next life through good karmic deeds, and in this regard transmigration became the prime reason for the lay practitioner's moral actions. For the ordained though, any moral actions, regardless of its inherent goodness, cannot be in and of itself be the goal,rather the precepts are just one of the tools to reach what can be termed, "nonexistence of a being".
      The present research aims to systematically analyze the precepts, its relationship to the wider Buddhist practices of cultivation, and its intrinsic connections to core Buddhist doctrines such as selflessness, emptiness, and especially nirvana and liberation. Furthermore, by examining how these connections are viewed and criticized outside of Buddhism, the present research seeks to investigate the requirements necessary to establish a Buddhist ethics that holds value for modern society.
      번역하기

      Traditional Buddhism's perspectives on the role of the precepts are two-fold. On one-hand, the precepts are regarded as the least minimum basic requirement that a person performs to be considered a moral being. On the other hand, precepts are perceive...

      Traditional Buddhism's perspectives on the role of the precepts are two-fold. On one-hand, the precepts are regarded as the least minimum basic requirement that a person performs to be considered a moral being. On the other hand, precepts are perceived as a temporary method (much like a raft used to cross the river) used to attain nirvana or liberation, the ultimate goal of Buddhism. This dual-nature of the precepts is fundamentally irreconcilable. The dual-natureof the precepts had been used by the early Buddhists to differentiate the moral practices and goals of the lay practitioner from the ordained. The goal of the lay practitioners in performing moral actions and cultivation was to ensure perfection of character within the secular and for practical religious benefits, e.g. the assurance of a good birth in the next life through good karmic deeds, and in this regard transmigration became the prime reason for the lay practitioner's moral actions. For the ordained though, any moral actions, regardless of its inherent goodness, cannot be in and of itself be the goal,rather the precepts are just one of the tools to reach what can be termed, "nonexistence of a being".
      The present research aims to systematically analyze the precepts, its relationship to the wider Buddhist practices of cultivation, and its intrinsic connections to core Buddhist doctrines such as selflessness, emptiness, and especially nirvana and liberation. Furthermore, by examining how these connections are viewed and criticized outside of Buddhism, the present research seeks to investigate the requirements necessary to establish a Buddhist ethics that holds value for modern society.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2019-06-17 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Association of Buddhist Studies -> Korean Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Buddhist Studies -> Korea Association of Buddhist Studies
      2019-06-07 학술지명변경 외국어명 : BUL GYO HAK YEONGU-Journal of Buddhist Studies -> Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.48 0.48 0.51
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.47 0.937 0.11
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼