This thesis attempts to explain Ta-hui Tsung-Kao(大慧宗杲: 1089-1163)'s view on scholar officials’ learning(學問). The targets of Ta-hui criticism are not limited to Ch'an Buddhism of the time. It targets the entire intellectual currents of th...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104204622
변희욱 (서울대학교)
2004
-
대혜(Ta-hui) ; 사대부(scholar officials) ; 학문비판(criticism on learning) ; 주체성( self reflection) ; 성찰(subjectivity) ; 사회적 실천(social engagement) ; “유학적 선(Confucian Ch'an) ; 대혜(Ta-hui) ; 사대부(scholar officials) ; 학문비판(criticism on learning) ; 주체성( self reflection) ; 성찰(subjectivity) ; 사회적 실천(social engagement) ; “유학적 선(Confucian Ch'an)
KCI등재후보
학술저널
217-244(28쪽)
6
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This thesis attempts to explain Ta-hui Tsung-Kao(大慧宗杲: 1089-1163)'s view on scholar officials’ learning(學問). The targets of Ta-hui criticism are not limited to Ch'an Buddhism of the time. It targets the entire intellectual currents of th...
This thesis attempts to explain Ta-hui Tsung-Kao(大慧宗杲: 1089-1163)'s view on scholar officials’ learning(學問). The targets of Ta-hui criticism are not limited to Ch'an Buddhism of the time. It targets the entire intellectual currents of the time. I believe, therefore, that the research on Ta-hui's criticism on the intellectual currents of the time is indispensible, as we investigate Ch'an's contribution on the development of the learning in Sung.
Ta-hui criticised scholars' learning for the state examination and their indifference in relating their study to the social issues of the time. With regard to the learning method, he was against their fragmented thinking, deficiency of self reflection, and noncritical readings. He diagnosed that all their problems originated from their negligence of self-reflection and insufficiency of self confidence. Thereupon, he suggested “seeing Ch'an's self-original perfect nature(見本來面目)" as the treatment for their problems. As it were, he exhorted scholar officials to practice mind cultivation of Ch'an.
This new way of learning suggested by Ta-hui includes social engagement of Confucianism as well as mind cultivation of Ch'an. In this regard, I would like to call Ta-hui's learning as “Confucian-Ch'an learning", and his Tao as “Social Everyday Mind(社會的 平常心是道)".
In conclusion, I would like to say that his criticism on scholar officials' learning is the fundamental criticism on the studying method of the time and that it also initiated intellectual discourses on this topic. Ta-hui's actual concern was on “the problem of man", when he talked about the problem of learning. At this point, he stands on the same ground of the Taoxué-movement(道學運動) in Sung dynasty. He made efforts not for the renovation of mind cultivation-method, but for the renewal of learning in Sung.
ガムポパの 『テムリム·タルゲン』 に引用される『菩提道灯論』
靑泉 申維翰의 불교관연구- 『奮忠抒難錄』을 중심으로 -
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | 평가 | 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지) | |
| 2019-06-17 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Korea Association of Buddhist Studies -> Korean Association of Buddhist Studies | |
| 2019-06-11 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Korean Society For Buddhist Studies -> Korea Association of Buddhist Studies | |
| 2019-06-07 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : BUL GYO HAK YEONGU-Journal of Buddhist Studies -> Korea Journal of Buddhist Studies | |
| 2015-01-01 | 등재 | 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) | |
| 2011-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 0.51 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 0.52 | 0.47 | 0.937 | 0.11 |