RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Can Participation Be Gender-Inclusive? Gender Roles, Development Projects and the Antamina Mining Company in Peru

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104084771

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The term ‘participation’ has become a principle guiding development projects since the 1980s. Even though the popularity of participation represents ongoing changes in development thinking which critically reflects the shortcomings of the previous project model, several scholars still express concerns about the disjuncture between the rhetoric and practice of participation, which ends up aggravating the exclusion of the previously excluded social groups. In recognition of such critiques, this article examines the exclusionary tendency of participatory development model with a particular focus on gender. For this purpose, this article comparatively analyzes the project participation by gender in four development projects which were implemented from 2006 to 2008 in the district of San Marcos, a Peruvian Andean village. In reference to the two influential frameworks in the development policies and research: Women in Development (WID) and Gender and Development (GAD), this article proposes the following two research questions: 1) whether participation was more exclusionary to women and men; and 2) whether women’s project participation entailed changes in gender relations which can be considered empowering. In conclusion, this article argues that: 1) development projects were not necessarily more exclusionary to women than to men especially when the previous gender roles corroborated with new roles imposed by the project participations; and 2) the project participation rarely led to any substantial changes in gender status which I measure through the analysis of women’s control of access and their roles in decision making at diverse levels.
      번역하기

      The term ‘participation’ has become a principle guiding development projects since the 1980s. Even though the popularity of participation represents ongoing changes in development thinking which critically reflects the shortcomings of the previous...

      The term ‘participation’ has become a principle guiding development projects since the 1980s. Even though the popularity of participation represents ongoing changes in development thinking which critically reflects the shortcomings of the previous project model, several scholars still express concerns about the disjuncture between the rhetoric and practice of participation, which ends up aggravating the exclusion of the previously excluded social groups. In recognition of such critiques, this article examines the exclusionary tendency of participatory development model with a particular focus on gender. For this purpose, this article comparatively analyzes the project participation by gender in four development projects which were implemented from 2006 to 2008 in the district of San Marcos, a Peruvian Andean village. In reference to the two influential frameworks in the development policies and research: Women in Development (WID) and Gender and Development (GAD), this article proposes the following two research questions: 1) whether participation was more exclusionary to women and men; and 2) whether women’s project participation entailed changes in gender relations which can be considered empowering. In conclusion, this article argues that: 1) development projects were not necessarily more exclusionary to women than to men especially when the previous gender roles corroborated with new roles imposed by the project participations; and 2) the project participation rarely led to any substantial changes in gender status which I measure through the analysis of women’s control of access and their roles in decision making at diverse levels.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Babb, Florence E., "Women and Men in Vicos, Peru: A Case of Unequal Development, In Peruvian Contexts of Change" Transaction Books 1985

      2 Crewe, Emma, "Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid" Zed Books 1988

      3 Hamilton, Sarah, "The Two-Headed Household: Gender and Rural Development in the Ecuadorean Andes" University of Pittsburgh 1998

      4 Mehta, Lyla, "The Double Bind: A Gender Analysis of Forced Displacement and Resettlement" 2002

      5 Woost, Michael, "The Common Sense of Development and the Struggle for Participatory Development in Sri Lanka, In Economic Development: An Anthropological Approach" Rowman & Littlefield 2002

      6 Cooke, Bill, "The Case for Participation as Tyranny, In Participation: The New Tyranny?" Zed Books 2001

      7 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Sustainability Report" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2005

      8 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Sustainability Report" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2007

      9 Ballard, Chris, "Resource Wars: The Anthropology of Mining" 32 : 287-313, 2003

      10 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Reporte Sostenibilidad" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2001

      1 Babb, Florence E., "Women and Men in Vicos, Peru: A Case of Unequal Development, In Peruvian Contexts of Change" Transaction Books 1985

      2 Crewe, Emma, "Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid" Zed Books 1988

      3 Hamilton, Sarah, "The Two-Headed Household: Gender and Rural Development in the Ecuadorean Andes" University of Pittsburgh 1998

      4 Mehta, Lyla, "The Double Bind: A Gender Analysis of Forced Displacement and Resettlement" 2002

      5 Woost, Michael, "The Common Sense of Development and the Struggle for Participatory Development in Sri Lanka, In Economic Development: An Anthropological Approach" Rowman & Littlefield 2002

      6 Cooke, Bill, "The Case for Participation as Tyranny, In Participation: The New Tyranny?" Zed Books 2001

      7 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Sustainability Report" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2005

      8 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Sustainability Report" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2007

      9 Ballard, Chris, "Resource Wars: The Anthropology of Mining" 32 : 287-313, 2003

      10 CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina), "Reporte Sostenibilidad" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A. 2001

      11 Nelson, Nici, "Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice" ITDG Publishing 1995

      12 Deere, Carmen Diana, "Peasant Production, Proletarianization, and the Sexual Division of Labor in the Andes" 7 (7): 338-360, 1981

      13 Cleaver, Frances, "Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development" 11 : 597-612, 1999

      14 Chambers, Robert, "Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development, In Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice" ITDG Publishing 1995

      15 Bebbington, Anthony, "Mining and Development in Peru: with Special Reference to the Rio Blanco Project" Peru Support Group 2007

      16 Moser, Caroline O. N, "Mainstreaming Gender and Development in the World Bank: Progress and Recommendations" World Bank 1999

      17 Szablowski, David, "Legitimacy and Regulation in the Global Economy: Legal Mediation of Conflicts between Communities and Transnational Mining Companies" York University 2004

      18 Cernea, Michael M., "Knowledge from Social Science for Development Policies and Projects, In Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development" Oxford University Press 1991

      19 Visvanathan, Nalini, "Introduction, In The Women, Gender, and Development Reader" Atlantic Highlands: Zed Books 1997

      20 FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural), "Informe Narrativo" ACUDIP 2008

      21 FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural), "Informe Narrativo" ACUDIP 2007

      22 FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural), "Informe Narrativo" ACUDIP 2006

      23 CMA, "Fondo Minero Antamina: Bases para la Selección de Proyectos" Compañía Minera Antamina S.A 2007

      24 Klohn Crippen-SVS, S.A., "Estudio de Impacto Ambiental _ Compañía Minera Antamina" Compañía Minera Antamina 1998

      25 IDMA, "Balance de la Labor Institucional IDMA 2006" IDMA 2006

      26 IDMA, "Balance de la Labor Institucional IDMA 2005" IDMA 2005

      27 Woost, Michael, "Alternative Vocabularies of Development?‘Community and ‘Participation in Development Discourses in Sri Lanka, In Discourses of Development:Anthropological Perspectives" Berg 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2016-03-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Revista Asiática de Estudios Iberoamericanos KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2012-08-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 서울대학교 라틴아메리카연구소 -> 라틴아메리카연구소
      영문명 : Institute of Latin American Studies at Seoul National University -> Institute of Latin American Studies
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-08-18 학회명변경 한글명 : 스페인중남미연구소 -> 서울대학교 라틴아메리카연구소
      영문명 : Institute of Iberian & Latin American Studies -> Institute of Latin American Studies at Seoul National University
      KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.27 0.689 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼