RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    The Effects of Web 2.0 on Political Participation: Evidence from a South Korean Government Wiki Website

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104833618

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Electronic government (e-government) refers to the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), the Internet in particular, to deliver public services and to facilitate civic participation in policy-making process. Many governments around the world have been moving toward online actively for over a decade to enhance administrative efficiency and democratic decision-making (Homburg 2008; Edmiston 2003). In particular, Web 2.0 has been widely used due to its efficiency and as a way of two-way communication.
    This paper seeks to clarify the relationship between Web 2.0 and political participation. Based on the contents of “DreamKorea,” which was an experimental government Web 2.0 wiki website operated separately from the official blog of the Presidential Council for Future and Vision in South Korea (the Republic of Korea), the paper finds probable evidences for both reinforcing and mobilizing effects of the Internet on civic participation in the policy-making process.
    The paper proceeds with explaining the wide use of the Web 2.0 in such countries as Australia and United Kingdom. The two countries utilized it as a way to further civic participation in the decision-making process since 2008. Chapter three discussed the origin and operation of DreamKorea from October to December 2008.
    During the period, the site posted 689 visitors and 29.512 page views a day. Yet only 15 contributions were made on the site. Registered users gave their opinions on low-carbon green growth strategy. The section on green growth prodded the registered users to write their comments. This seems to be the nature of contents, as the site addressed the mid-term and long-term policy visions rather than the immediate issues that concern the citizens.
    A survey was conducted to find the political orientation of the registered users. But only 1.5% of the users responded to the survey. Based on the survey outcome, it was cautiously argued that the two factors, the reinforcement and mobilization effects, are not always mutually exclusive, but may often occur simultaneously. Specific content of the site and more accessible style also mattered in attracting more users to the site. Thus the wiki site extended opportunities for civic engagement in policy-making process.
    The paper recommends that further detailed research need to be conducted to specifically explore the relationship between the reinforcement and mobilization effects of the web 2.0.
    번역하기

    Electronic government (e-government) refers to the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), the Internet in particular, to deliver public services and to facilitate civic participation in policy-making process. Many governments around th...

    Electronic government (e-government) refers to the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT), the Internet in particular, to deliver public services and to facilitate civic participation in policy-making process. Many governments around the world have been moving toward online actively for over a decade to enhance administrative efficiency and democratic decision-making (Homburg 2008; Edmiston 2003). In particular, Web 2.0 has been widely used due to its efficiency and as a way of two-way communication.
    This paper seeks to clarify the relationship between Web 2.0 and political participation. Based on the contents of “DreamKorea,” which was an experimental government Web 2.0 wiki website operated separately from the official blog of the Presidential Council for Future and Vision in South Korea (the Republic of Korea), the paper finds probable evidences for both reinforcing and mobilizing effects of the Internet on civic participation in the policy-making process.
    The paper proceeds with explaining the wide use of the Web 2.0 in such countries as Australia and United Kingdom. The two countries utilized it as a way to further civic participation in the decision-making process since 2008. Chapter three discussed the origin and operation of DreamKorea from October to December 2008.
    During the period, the site posted 689 visitors and 29.512 page views a day. Yet only 15 contributions were made on the site. Registered users gave their opinions on low-carbon green growth strategy. The section on green growth prodded the registered users to write their comments. This seems to be the nature of contents, as the site addressed the mid-term and long-term policy visions rather than the immediate issues that concern the citizens.
    A survey was conducted to find the political orientation of the registered users. But only 1.5% of the users responded to the survey. Based on the survey outcome, it was cautiously argued that the two factors, the reinforcement and mobilization effects, are not always mutually exclusive, but may often occur simultaneously. Specific content of the site and more accessible style also mattered in attracting more users to the site. Thus the wiki site extended opportunities for civic engagement in policy-making process.
    The paper recommends that further detailed research need to be conducted to specifically explore the relationship between the reinforcement and mobilization effects of the web 2.0.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 장우영, "정치적 기회구조와 사회운동: ‘총선연대’와 ‘노사모’의 사이버액티비즘을 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 13 (13): 49-68, 2006

    2 이원태, "웹 2.0 시대 의사결정 방식의 변화와 정책적 함의" 2008

    3 윤종빈, "시민의 온라인 정치참여" 한국정당학회 3 (3): 197-220, 2004

    4 임준형, "도시전자정부가 시민참여에 미치는 영향: 환경의제를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 40 (40): 53-76, 2006

    5 김성태, "광역자치단체의 전자정부 추진 실태" 한국행정학회 34 (34): 235-255, 2000

    6 "Write Your Own Laws" 26 : 2007

    7 Tapscott, Don, "Wikinomics. New York: Portfolio. United Nations, UN E-Governmen Survey 2012"

    8 Barber, Benjamin R., "Which Technology for Which Democracy?" 6 : 1-8, 2001

    9 O’Reilly, Tim, "What is Web 2.0?"

    10 Tolbert, Caroline J., "Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation" 56 (56): 175-185, 2003

    1 장우영, "정치적 기회구조와 사회운동: ‘총선연대’와 ‘노사모’의 사이버액티비즘을 중심으로" 한국정보화진흥원 13 (13): 49-68, 2006

    2 이원태, "웹 2.0 시대 의사결정 방식의 변화와 정책적 함의" 2008

    3 윤종빈, "시민의 온라인 정치참여" 한국정당학회 3 (3): 197-220, 2004

    4 임준형, "도시전자정부가 시민참여에 미치는 영향: 환경의제를 중심으로" 한국행정학회 40 (40): 53-76, 2006

    5 김성태, "광역자치단체의 전자정부 추진 실태" 한국행정학회 34 (34): 235-255, 2000

    6 "Write Your Own Laws" 26 : 2007

    7 Tapscott, Don, "Wikinomics. New York: Portfolio. United Nations, UN E-Governmen Survey 2012"

    8 Barber, Benjamin R., "Which Technology for Which Democracy?" 6 : 1-8, 2001

    9 O’Reilly, Tim, "What is Web 2.0?"

    10 Tolbert, Caroline J., "Unraveling the Effects of the Internet on Political Participation" 56 (56): 175-185, 2003

    11 "UN E-Government Survey 2008" United Nations

    12 Barber, Benjamin R., "Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong democracy" 113 (113): 573-589, 1988

    13 Davies, R., "The Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System" Oxford University Press 1999

    14 Bimber, Bruce, "The Internet and Political Information: Populism, Community, and Accelerated Pluralism" 31 (31): 133-160, 1998

    15 Stanley, J. Woody, "The Effects of Internet Use on Political Participation : Evidence from an Agency Online Discussion Forum" 3 (3): 503-527, 2004

    16 Winkel, Olaf, "The Democratic Potentials of Interactive Information Technologies under Discussion : Problems, Viewpoints, and Perspectives" 6 : 1-15, 2000

    17 Arterton, Christopher, "Teledemocracy: Can Technology Protect Democracy?" Sage Publications 1987

    18 "Technology is a tool for revolution (and repression)"

    19 Edmiston, Kelly D., "State and Local E-Government : Prospects and Challenges" 33 (33): 20-45, 2003

    20 Saletan, William, "Springtime for Twitter. Is the Internet driving the revolutions of the Arab Spring"

    21 HEEJOONSONG, "PROSPECTS AND LIMITATIONS OF THE E-GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE IN KOREA" 한국행정학회 7 (7): 45-53, 2002

    22 "Lee Eyes ‘Green, Great, Unified Korea"

    23 Homburg, Vincent M., "Introduction : Zooming In and Zooming Out on Electronic Government" 31 : 707-710, 2008

    24 Chadwick, Andrew, "Internet Politics: States, Citizens, and New Communication Technologies" Oxford University Press 2006

    25 Bimber, Bruce, "Information and Political Engagement in America : TheSearch for Effects of Information Technology at the Individual Level" 54 (54): 53-67, 2001

    26 West, Darrell M, "Improving Technology Utilization in Electronic Government around the World 2008" Brookings Institution 2008

    27 장우영, "How User-Generated Content (UGC) Campaign Changes Electoral Politics?" 한국학술연구원 39 (39): 369-406, 2008

    28 Friedman, Thomas L., "Hot, Flat and Crowded: Why We Need a Green Revolution and HowIt Can Renew America" Farrar, Strauss and Giroux 2008

    29 Kim, Soonhee, "Factors Affecting State Government Information Technology Employee Turnover Intentions" 35 (35): 137-156, 2005

    30 Riley Report, "Electronic Governance and Electronic Democracy"

    31 Siddiquee, Noore Alam, "E-Government and Innovations in Service Delivery: The Malaysian Experience" 31 : 797-815, 2008

    32 이정우, "Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model" 18 (18): 122-136, 200101

    33 Anderson, Lisa, "Demystifying the arab spring: parsing the differences between Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya" 90 (90): 2-7, 2011

    34 La Porte, "Democracy and Bureaucracy in the Age of the Web : Empirical Findings and Theoretical Speculations" 34 (34): 411-446, 2002

    35 O’Sullivan, Patrick B., "Computer Networks and Political Participation : Santa Monica’s Teledemocracy Project" 23 : 93-107, 1995

    36 Kim, Joong-Yang, "A New Paradigm for Public Management in the 21st Century" Korea Institute for Public Administration 2005

    37 한국인터넷진흥원, "2008년 인터넷 백서" 2008

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.47
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.46 0.727 0.13
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼