RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      말지각의 기초표상: 음소 또는 변별자질 = The Primitive Representation in Speech Perception: Phoneme or Distinctive Features

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99924387

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Using a target detection task, this study compared the processing automaticity of phonemes and features in spoken syllable stimuli to determine the primitive representation in speech perception, phoneme or distinctive feature. For this, we modified the visual search task(Treisman et al., 1992) developed to investigate the processing of visual features(ex. color, shape or their conjunction) for auditory stimuli. In our task, the distinctive features(ex. aspiration or coronal) corresponded to visual primitive features(ex. color and shape), and the phonemes(ex. /th/) to visual conjunctive features(ex. colored shapes). The automaticity is measured by the set size effect that was the increasing amount of reaction time when the number of distracters increased. Three experiments were conducted. The laryngeal features(experiment 1), the manner features(experiment 2), and the place features(experiment 3) were compared with phonemes. The results showed that the distinctive features are consistently processed faster and automatically than the phonemes. Additionally there were differences in the processing automaticity among the classes of distinctive features. The laryngeal features are the most automatic, the manner features are moderately automatic and the place features are the least automatic. These results are consistent with the previous studies(Bae et al., 2002; Bae, 2010) that showed the perceptual hierarchy of distinctive features.
      번역하기

      Using a target detection task, this study compared the processing automaticity of phonemes and features in spoken syllable stimuli to determine the primitive representation in speech perception, phoneme or distinctive feature. For this, we modified th...

      Using a target detection task, this study compared the processing automaticity of phonemes and features in spoken syllable stimuli to determine the primitive representation in speech perception, phoneme or distinctive feature. For this, we modified the visual search task(Treisman et al., 1992) developed to investigate the processing of visual features(ex. color, shape or their conjunction) for auditory stimuli. In our task, the distinctive features(ex. aspiration or coronal) corresponded to visual primitive features(ex. color and shape), and the phonemes(ex. /th/) to visual conjunctive features(ex. colored shapes). The automaticity is measured by the set size effect that was the increasing amount of reaction time when the number of distracters increased. Three experiments were conducted. The laryngeal features(experiment 1), the manner features(experiment 2), and the place features(experiment 3) were compared with phonemes. The results showed that the distinctive features are consistently processed faster and automatically than the phonemes. Additionally there were differences in the processing automaticity among the classes of distinctive features. The laryngeal features are the most automatic, the manner features are moderately automatic and the place features are the least automatic. These results are consistent with the previous studies(Bae et al., 2002; Bae, 2010) that showed the perceptual hierarchy of distinctive features.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 3. 실험 1. 후두부류 자질과 음소 탐지
      • 4. 실험 2. 조음방법 자질과 음소 탐지
      • ABSTRACT
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 연구방법
      • 3. 실험 1. 후두부류 자질과 음소 탐지
      • 4. 실험 2. 조음방법 자질과 음소 탐지
      • 5. 실험 3. 조음위치자질과 음소
      • 6. 전체 결과
      • 7. 논의
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 배문정, "한국어 자음의 지각적 구조" 14 (14): 375-408, 2002

      2 배문정, "한국어 자음에서 변별 자질들의 지각적 위계" 한국음성학회 2 (2): 109-118, 2010

      3 배문정, "한국어 변별 자질의 지각적 표상 구조" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

      4 배문정, "한국어 단음절에서 자음과 모음 자질의 비선형적 지각" 한국음성학회 1 (1): 29-38, 2009

      5 이광오, "음성지각 과정에서 음절의 역할과 기저 음절의 복원" 9 : 73-94, 1997

      6 고영진, "변별자질 그 탄생과 활약" 동인 2000

      7 배문정, "고설 모음 환경에서 한국어 자음의 지각적 구조" 한국음성학회 1 (1): 95-103, 2009

      8 Pitt, M. A., "The use of rhythm in attending to speech" 16 : 564-573, 1990

      9 Chomsky, N., "The sound pattern of English" Harper and Row 1968

      10 Cutler, A., "The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access" 14 : 113-121, 1988

      1 배문정, "한국어 자음의 지각적 구조" 14 (14): 375-408, 2002

      2 배문정, "한국어 자음에서 변별 자질들의 지각적 위계" 한국음성학회 2 (2): 109-118, 2010

      3 배문정, "한국어 변별 자질의 지각적 표상 구조" 서울대학교 대학원 2003

      4 배문정, "한국어 단음절에서 자음과 모음 자질의 비선형적 지각" 한국음성학회 1 (1): 29-38, 2009

      5 이광오, "음성지각 과정에서 음절의 역할과 기저 음절의 복원" 9 : 73-94, 1997

      6 고영진, "변별자질 그 탄생과 활약" 동인 2000

      7 배문정, "고설 모음 환경에서 한국어 자음의 지각적 구조" 한국음성학회 1 (1): 95-103, 2009

      8 Pitt, M. A., "The use of rhythm in attending to speech" 16 : 564-573, 1990

      9 Chomsky, N., "The sound pattern of English" Harper and Row 1968

      10 Cutler, A., "The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access" 14 : 113-121, 1988

      11 McCarthy, J. J., "The phonetics and phonology of semitic pharyngeals, In Patricia Keating, Papers in Laboratory Phonology III: Phonological Structure and Phonetic Form" Cambridge University Press 191-233, 1994

      12 Liberman, A. M, "The motor theory of speech perception revised" 21 : 136-, 1985

      13 Port, R., "The graphical basis of phones and phonemes, In Second language speech learning: The role of language experience in speech perception and production" John Benjamins 349-365, 2006

      14 Clements, G. N., "The geometry of phonological features" 2 : 225-252, 1985

      15 Kim, K. H., "The Phonological Representation of Distinctive Features: Korean Consonantal Phonology" the University of Iowa 1987

      16 Lindblom, B., "Systemic constraints and adaptive change in the formation of sound structure, In Approaches to the evolution of language: social and cognitive bases" Cambridge University Press 1998

      17 Dahan, D., "Spoken-word recognition, In Handbook of Psycholinguistics" Academic Press 249-283, 2006

      18 Fowler, C. A., "Speech production, In Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Speech, Language and Communication (vol 11)" Academic Press 1995

      19 Goldinger, S. D., "Speech perception and spoken word recognition, In Principles of Experimental Phonetics" 277-327, 1996

      20 Kohler, K., "Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological facts and phonetic explanations, In Speech production and speech modelling" Kluwer 69-92, 1990

      21 Jakobson, R., "Preliminaries to Speech Analysis" MIT Press 1952

      22 Repp, B. H., "Phonetic categories are flexible, In Categorical perception" Cambridge University Press 89-112, 1987

      23 Frauenfelder, U. H., "Phoneme monitoring and lexical processing : Evidence for associative context effects" 17 : 134-140, 1989

      24 Mitchell, L. M., "Perceptual structure of 16 prevoclaic English consonants sententially embedded" 55 : 1355-1357, 1974

      25 Broadbent, D. E., "Perception and Communication" Pergammon Press 1958

      26 Prince, A., "Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar" 1993

      27 Stevens, K. N., "Models of phonetic recognition II: A feature-based model of speech recognition" 1986

      28 Lahiri, A., "Lexical processing and phonological representa- tion, In Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody" Cambridge University Press 229-260, 1992

      29 Marslen-Wilson, W. D., "Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access : Words, phonemes, and features" 101 : 653-675, 1994

      30 Boersma, P., "Functional Phonology: formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives" Holland Academic Graphics 1998

      31 Treisman, A., "Emergent features, attention and object perception" 10 : 12-21, 1984

      32 Lahiri, A., "Distinctive features : Phonological underspecification in representation and processing" 38 : 44-59, 2010

      33 Lindblom, B., "Developmental origins of adult phonology : The interplay between phonetic emergents and the evolutionary adaptations of sound patterns" 57 : 297-314, 2000

      34 Eimas, P. D., "Dependency Relations During the Processing of Speech, In Perspectives in the Study of Speech" Lawrence Erlbaum Ass 283-309, 1981

      35 Sehneider, W., "Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention" 84 : 1-66, 1977

      36 Wang, M. D., "Consonant confusions in noise : a study of perceptual features" 54 : 1248-1266, 1973

      37 Goldsmith, J., "Autosegmental phonology" MIT 1976

      38 Treisman, A., "Automatic and preattentive processing" 105 : 341-362, 1992

      39 Eimas P D., "Asymmetric dependencies in processing phonetic features" 23 (23): 12-20, 1978

      40 Browman, C., "Articulatory phonology : An overview" 49 : 155-180, 1992

      41 Miller, G. A., "An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants" 27 : 623-638, 1955

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.5 0.5 0.52
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.5 0.49 0.988 0.22
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼