RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      MBTI 타당도에 관한 일 연구 - 성격진단검사와의 상관 연구 = A Study on the Validity of MBTI

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3128836

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this present study was to test the validity of MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) through the relational analysis between MBTI and SPDI(Standardized Personality Diagnosis Inventory). There were 505 people involved in the study. This included 191 high school students, 199 college students and 115 adults. The experiment used on these people was MBTI and SPDI. The data was analyzed to see the relation between the traits of SPDI and four preference indicators of MBTI. The results of the study were as follows ; First, the E indicator of MBTI and SPDI, which include Emotional stability, Dominance, Sociability, Masculinity, Impulsiveness and Superiority, have high positive relations in the context of the relationships between the traits of SPDI and four preference indicators of MBTI. The same is true for the I indicator of MBTI and Reflectiveness, Conformity, Depression, Anxiety, Paranoid tendency, Autism, Nervousness of SPDI. The S indicator of MBTI and Responsibility, Conformity of SPDI have meaningful positive relations and the same is true for the relations between T indicator and Emotional stability, Dominance, Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Masculinity, F indicator and Sociability, Conformity, Impulsiveness, Nervousness, J indicator and Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Conformity, P indicator and Sociability, Masculinity, Impulsiveness. Second, referring to the differences between four function types of MBTI and SPDI, ST type is higher in Responsibility, Masculinity, SF type is higher in Conformity, NT type is higher in Emotional stability, Dominance, Reflectiveness and Masculinity, NF type is higher in Sociability, Impulsiveness more than any other type. Third, regarding the differences between four temperament types of MBTI and SPDI, SP temperament is meaningfully higher in Impulsiveness, Conformity, Anxiety, Nervousness of SPDI than any other temperament type. The same is true for SJ temperament in Responsibility, Conformity, NT temperament in Emotional stability, Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Masculinity, NF temperament in Sociability, Impulsiveness. The results synthesized from this study are as follows ; Four preference indicators of MBTI have very meaningful relations with the traits of SPDI, four function types and four temperament types of MBTI also have meaningful differences compared with the traits of SPDI. Therefore, the result of this study supports that MBTI based on the psychological typology by Carl Jung is a very useful instrument for human understanding.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this present study was to test the validity of MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) through the relational analysis between MBTI and SPDI(Standardized Personality Diagnosis Inventory). There were 505 people involved in the study. This in...

      The purpose of this present study was to test the validity of MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator) through the relational analysis between MBTI and SPDI(Standardized Personality Diagnosis Inventory). There were 505 people involved in the study. This included 191 high school students, 199 college students and 115 adults. The experiment used on these people was MBTI and SPDI. The data was analyzed to see the relation between the traits of SPDI and four preference indicators of MBTI. The results of the study were as follows ; First, the E indicator of MBTI and SPDI, which include Emotional stability, Dominance, Sociability, Masculinity, Impulsiveness and Superiority, have high positive relations in the context of the relationships between the traits of SPDI and four preference indicators of MBTI. The same is true for the I indicator of MBTI and Reflectiveness, Conformity, Depression, Anxiety, Paranoid tendency, Autism, Nervousness of SPDI. The S indicator of MBTI and Responsibility, Conformity of SPDI have meaningful positive relations and the same is true for the relations between T indicator and Emotional stability, Dominance, Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Masculinity, F indicator and Sociability, Conformity, Impulsiveness, Nervousness, J indicator and Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Conformity, P indicator and Sociability, Masculinity, Impulsiveness. Second, referring to the differences between four function types of MBTI and SPDI, ST type is higher in Responsibility, Masculinity, SF type is higher in Conformity, NT type is higher in Emotional stability, Dominance, Reflectiveness and Masculinity, NF type is higher in Sociability, Impulsiveness more than any other type. Third, regarding the differences between four temperament types of MBTI and SPDI, SP temperament is meaningfully higher in Impulsiveness, Conformity, Anxiety, Nervousness of SPDI than any other temperament type. The same is true for SJ temperament in Responsibility, Conformity, NT temperament in Emotional stability, Responsibility, Reflectiveness, Masculinity, NF temperament in Sociability, Impulsiveness. The results synthesized from this study are as follows ; Four preference indicators of MBTI have very meaningful relations with the traits of SPDI, four function types and four temperament types of MBTI also have meaningful differences compared with the traits of SPDI. Therefore, the result of this study supports that MBTI based on the psychological typology by Carl Jung is a very useful instrument for human understanding.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼