RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      셰익스피어 공연에서의 수행적 실험과 포스트모던적 현대성 —제의적 수행에서 관객이 ‘쓰는’ 놀이적 수행까지 = Performativity Experiments and Postmodernity in Four Performances of Shakespeare Plays

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103995473

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This article focuses on the aspect of performativity in performances of Shakespeare’s plays in Korea as well as the postmodern quality of the performances. Performativity signifies the co-existence of the stage and the audience. What takes place on the stage affects and is affected by the audience. Therefore the audience and the performance on the stage together produce multiple meanings which change at every instant. The four performances considered in this article are based on Shakespeare’s works, and each has unique characteristics. However, they all involve and show the interactions between the performance and the audience, thereby demolishing the fourth wall and the barrier between the stage and the audience.
      Jukjuk’s <Macbeth> is performative in two ways: first, the performance is so materialistic that it touches the inner memory and feelings of the audience and, second, it produces open signifiers. The performance itself communicates with the audience through its ritualistic aspect, inducing changes in the emotions of the audience, and thus increasing the degree of performativity. The movements of characters are neither standard nor conventional: sometimes they are like dances and sometimes they are like Takgeon. The positions of the chairs are changed continuously and these arrangements form special relationships with the characters. Therefore, the movements of the characters and positions of the chairs produce meanings that are ambiguous for the audience, and thus act as open signifers.
      <Romeo and Juliet Are Murdered> continuously urges the audience to compare and contrast Shakespeare’s work and the movie by Franco Geffireli. Therefore, the audience participates in the process of creating the meanings because the performance on the stage creates open signifiers to be felt and understood by the audience. The performance is different from both the original work and the movie, in that it is a complete parody of the originals. This use of parody results in the process, for the audience, of comparing the two texts. In this way, the performance induces the continued participation of the audience and employs a high degree of performativity.
      <The Taming of a Shrew> and <A Comic Show, Romeo and Juliet> are further examples of active performativity. In these works, the audience ‘writes’ the work by actively participating in the performances. For example, at the beginning of the performance the audience chooses the actor and actress to play Romeo and Juliet from among many candidates, and in the middle of the performance they change the actor and actress. The performances rely entirely upon the intervention and the participation of the audience. Therefore, the performativity of the two performances is strongly enhanced and the traditional distinction between the stage and the audience is strikingly reduced. It can be concluded that the four above-mentioned works are each performative in unique ways.
      Furthermore, there are also strong postmodern aspects of the four above-mentioned works. In <Macbeth>, signifiers do not have any fixed meaning; they are left open through ambiguity and connotative suggestion. <Romeo and Juliet> uses parody in a post-modern fashion, and <The Taming of a Shrew> and <A Comic Show> have a hyper-textual quality, and at the same time depend upon the element of chance. All of these postmodern characteristics are analyzed in this article.
      번역하기

      This article focuses on the aspect of performativity in performances of Shakespeare’s plays in Korea as well as the postmodern quality of the performances. Performativity signifies the co-existence of the stage and the audience. What takes place on ...

      This article focuses on the aspect of performativity in performances of Shakespeare’s plays in Korea as well as the postmodern quality of the performances. Performativity signifies the co-existence of the stage and the audience. What takes place on the stage affects and is affected by the audience. Therefore the audience and the performance on the stage together produce multiple meanings which change at every instant. The four performances considered in this article are based on Shakespeare’s works, and each has unique characteristics. However, they all involve and show the interactions between the performance and the audience, thereby demolishing the fourth wall and the barrier between the stage and the audience.
      Jukjuk’s <Macbeth> is performative in two ways: first, the performance is so materialistic that it touches the inner memory and feelings of the audience and, second, it produces open signifiers. The performance itself communicates with the audience through its ritualistic aspect, inducing changes in the emotions of the audience, and thus increasing the degree of performativity. The movements of characters are neither standard nor conventional: sometimes they are like dances and sometimes they are like Takgeon. The positions of the chairs are changed continuously and these arrangements form special relationships with the characters. Therefore, the movements of the characters and positions of the chairs produce meanings that are ambiguous for the audience, and thus act as open signifers.
      <Romeo and Juliet Are Murdered> continuously urges the audience to compare and contrast Shakespeare’s work and the movie by Franco Geffireli. Therefore, the audience participates in the process of creating the meanings because the performance on the stage creates open signifiers to be felt and understood by the audience. The performance is different from both the original work and the movie, in that it is a complete parody of the originals. This use of parody results in the process, for the audience, of comparing the two texts. In this way, the performance induces the continued participation of the audience and employs a high degree of performativity.
      <The Taming of a Shrew> and <A Comic Show, Romeo and Juliet> are further examples of active performativity. In these works, the audience ‘writes’ the work by actively participating in the performances. For example, at the beginning of the performance the audience chooses the actor and actress to play Romeo and Juliet from among many candidates, and in the middle of the performance they change the actor and actress. The performances rely entirely upon the intervention and the participation of the audience. Therefore, the performativity of the two performances is strongly enhanced and the traditional distinction between the stage and the audience is strikingly reduced. It can be concluded that the four above-mentioned works are each performative in unique ways.
      Furthermore, there are also strong postmodern aspects of the four above-mentioned works. In <Macbeth>, signifiers do not have any fixed meaning; they are left open through ambiguity and connotative suggestion. <Romeo and Juliet> uses parody in a post-modern fashion, and <The Taming of a Shrew> and <A Comic Show> have a hyper-textual quality, and at the same time depend upon the element of chance. All of these postmodern characteristics are analyzed in this article.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이경미, "현대공연예술의 수행성과 그 의미" 한국연극학회 31 (31): 135-167, 2007

      2 리차드 쉐크너, "퍼포먼스 이론 I, II" 현대 미학사 2001

      3 린다 허치언, "패로디 이론" 문예출판사 1992

      4 사라 살리, "주디스 버틀러의 철학과 우울" 앨피 2004

      5 표원섭, "쟝 루이 바로의 총체연극 연구" 9 : 169-189, 1997

      6 루츠 무스너, "우리는 어떻게 행동하는가: 문화학과 퍼포먼스" 유로서적 2009

      7 대지, "오브제와 제스처로 표현된 ‘맥베스’"

      8 김방옥, "물, 불, 흙, 그리고 몸: 무대 위의 ‘물질’과 ‘몸’으로서의 관객의 가능성에 관하여" 22 : 72-93, 1994

      9 김대준, "맥베스: 죄의식과의 지속적인 대화"

      10 국립극장기자단, "맥베스: 인간의 욕망과 파괴"

      1 이경미, "현대공연예술의 수행성과 그 의미" 한국연극학회 31 (31): 135-167, 2007

      2 리차드 쉐크너, "퍼포먼스 이론 I, II" 현대 미학사 2001

      3 린다 허치언, "패로디 이론" 문예출판사 1992

      4 사라 살리, "주디스 버틀러의 철학과 우울" 앨피 2004

      5 표원섭, "쟝 루이 바로의 총체연극 연구" 9 : 169-189, 1997

      6 루츠 무스너, "우리는 어떻게 행동하는가: 문화학과 퍼포먼스" 유로서적 2009

      7 대지, "오브제와 제스처로 표현된 ‘맥베스’"

      8 김방옥, "물, 불, 흙, 그리고 몸: 무대 위의 ‘물질’과 ‘몸’으로서의 관객의 가능성에 관하여" 22 : 72-93, 1994

      9 김대준, "맥베스: 죄의식과의 지속적인 대화"

      10 국립극장기자단, "맥베스: 인간의 욕망과 파괴"

      11 도연화, "맥베스"

      12 김낙형, "맥베드 연출노트" 37 (37): 193-198, 2010

      13 노근우, "강도높은 비극"

      14 심재민, "‘몸의 연극’에서의 수행적인 것의 가능성과 한계" 한국드라마학회 30 (30): 35-55, 2009

      15 Fischer-Lichte, Erika, "The Transformative Power of Performance: A New Aesthetics" Routledge 2008

      16 Kim Daehwan, "The Taming of the Shrew. By William Shakespeare"

      17 Counsell, Colin, "Signs of Performance: An Introduction to Twentieth-Century Theatre" Oxford UP 1997

      18 Jung Bumcheol, "Romeo and Juliet Are Killed. By William Shakespeare"

      19 Lehmann,Hans-Thies, "Postdramatic Theatre" Routledge 2006

      20 Rose, Margaret A, "Parody: Ancient, Modern, and Post-modern" Cambridge UP 1993

      21 Kim Nackhyoung, "Macbeth. By William Shakespeare"

      22 Yeo Giya, "Comic Show, Romeo and Juliet. By William Shakespeare"

      23 Warner, William Beatty, "Chance and the Text of Experience: Freud, Nietzsche, and Shakespeare’s Hamlet" Cornell UP 1986

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2018 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-04-24 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스 영문학회 -> 한국 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-07-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 고전 르네상스영문학회 -> 고전 르네상스 영문학회 KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.15 1.112 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼