RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    2013. 6. 19. 이후 분양된 아파트의 하자보수 및 담보책임에 관한 연구 = Studies on Defect Repairs and Warranty Liabilities of Apartments Parcelled out since 19. June 2013

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109467632

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    On Dec. 18. 2012, the National Assembly amended Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building to reasonably improve/maintain the guarantee responsibility regulations against aggregate building defect, which have caused an interpretative problem in relation to the Housing Act. Since Apr. 10. 1984, on which Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building was established, the regulations regarding the term of warranty liability have been criticized a lot. Therefore, such regulations including the establishment of content that a builder can be an opposite party for the warranty liability could be amended for the first time. Through this article, the author introduces the main issues for the amended or newly-established provisions, as well as provides the explanations for them. In addition, the author summarizes the predicted controversial issues when considering the applications of the amended act. Because Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building was enforced on Jun. 19. 2013, and also applied to the building parcelled only after that day, the conflicts caused by the applications of such an act do not lead to a suit at present. Therefore, we first need to examine the reason why Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building couldn't be amended as above or the establishment process of basic act, which are associated with the claim suit for defect relationship. Next, while explaining the main issues for the amended or newly-established provisions, the author discusses whether the existing act can be maintained when interpreting Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building, as well as whether the existing act might be modified according to the amendment of act.
    번역하기

    On Dec. 18. 2012, the National Assembly amended Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building to reasonably improve/maintain the guarantee responsibility regulations against aggregate building defect, which have caused an interpretativ...

    On Dec. 18. 2012, the National Assembly amended Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building to reasonably improve/maintain the guarantee responsibility regulations against aggregate building defect, which have caused an interpretative problem in relation to the Housing Act. Since Apr. 10. 1984, on which Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building was established, the regulations regarding the term of warranty liability have been criticized a lot. Therefore, such regulations including the establishment of content that a builder can be an opposite party for the warranty liability could be amended for the first time. Through this article, the author introduces the main issues for the amended or newly-established provisions, as well as provides the explanations for them. In addition, the author summarizes the predicted controversial issues when considering the applications of the amended act. Because Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building was enforced on Jun. 19. 2013, and also applied to the building parcelled only after that day, the conflicts caused by the applications of such an act do not lead to a suit at present. Therefore, we first need to examine the reason why Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building couldn't be amended as above or the establishment process of basic act, which are associated with the claim suit for defect relationship. Next, while explaining the main issues for the amended or newly-established provisions, the author discusses whether the existing act can be maintained when interpreting Laws about the Ownership and Management of Aggregate Building, as well as whether the existing act might be modified according to the amendment of act.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼