A retrospective comparative analysis was made to assess the relative efficacy and advantage of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions in patients with 33 various pancreatic diseases. All patients un...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106932249
1984
Korean
KCI등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
128-132(5쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
A retrospective comparative analysis was made to assess the relative efficacy and advantage of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions in patients with 33 various pancreatic diseases. All patients un...
A retrospective comparative analysis was made to assess the relative efficacy and advantage of computed tomography (CT) and ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic lesions in patients with 33 various pancreatic diseases. All patients underwent both CT and ultrasound examinations. CT has advantages in delineation of morphologic anatomy and its extent, and in identifying abnormal gas and calcification. On the other hand, ultrasound has advantages in evaluation of cystic lesion, pancreatic duct and bile duct. Authors recommend ultrasound as a screening test in the diagnosis of uncomplicated pancreatitis, pseudo-syst and pancreatic cancer producing jaundice, but recommend CT in the diagnosis of complicate pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis and non- jaundiced patient with suspected pancreatic cancer, Ultrasound has additional advantage in ultrasound - guided aspiration biopsy.