RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      영국 권리옹호서비스의 자율적 의사결정 지원에 관한 연구 - 의사대변인(IMCA) 제도의 분석과 전망 - = A Study on Decision-making Support System in the England Advocacy Service - Analysis and Prospect of the IMCA scheme-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104922308

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      We analyzed the IMCA of the England. The purpose of the study is as follows. First, it identifies the theoretical reasons for decision support. Secondly, it is to consider the type of system for the support of self-determination referring to the British case. Research results are as follows. IMCA is not the role of surrogate decision-making directly. Person is at the center, and the support part so as to be able to their important decisions. We defined that such a system supported decision-making to, or is the type of decision-making assistance. Adult guardianship system in Korea, which may be a proxy determining systems, rather than this type, it is possible to further evaluate the democratic one step advanced method. Direction of the development of the resulting decision support system throughout the study are as follows. We must develop a system to support the advocacy activities of citizens as IMCA. Local governments and social welfare workers, must be made with the advocacy organization the support system through collaboration and cooperation. There is a need to create a specific alternative on infrastructure and public support system for the self-determination support activities of the local community, such as IMCA training. Also, to realize the persons will and choice, we should make arrangement of a support procedure and specific programs for whose judgment ability is insufficient as IMCA service.
      번역하기

      We analyzed the IMCA of the England. The purpose of the study is as follows. First, it identifies the theoretical reasons for decision support. Secondly, it is to consider the type of system for the support of self-determination referring to the Briti...

      We analyzed the IMCA of the England. The purpose of the study is as follows. First, it identifies the theoretical reasons for decision support. Secondly, it is to consider the type of system for the support of self-determination referring to the British case. Research results are as follows. IMCA is not the role of surrogate decision-making directly. Person is at the center, and the support part so as to be able to their important decisions. We defined that such a system supported decision-making to, or is the type of decision-making assistance. Adult guardianship system in Korea, which may be a proxy determining systems, rather than this type, it is possible to further evaluate the democratic one step advanced method. Direction of the development of the resulting decision support system throughout the study are as follows. We must develop a system to support the advocacy activities of citizens as IMCA. Local governments and social welfare workers, must be made with the advocacy organization the support system through collaboration and cooperation. There is a need to create a specific alternative on infrastructure and public support system for the self-determination support activities of the local community, such as IMCA training. Also, to realize the persons will and choice, we should make arrangement of a support procedure and specific programs for whose judgment ability is insufficient as IMCA service.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최윤영, "장애인성년후견제 운영방안" 한국지적장애인복지협회 2012

      2 정봉근, "의사결정지원제도의 도입 추진 방안" 년후견제도폐지추진연대 2015

      3 제철웅, "유엔 장애인 권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국의 성년후견제도: 현재와 미래" 법무법인 율촌·한국지적장애인복지협회 2014

      4 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안" 한국민사법학회 56 : 277-331, 2011

      5 김용득, "영국 커뮤니티케어의 이용자 참여 기제와 한국 장애인복지서비스에 대한 함의" 한국사회복지학회 57 (57): 363-387, 2005

      6 이명현, "영국 성년후견법을 통해 본 복지사회 구상: 의사결정능력법(Mental Capacity Act)의 자기결정 지원을 중심으로" 5.18연구소 12 (12): 407-444, 2012

      7 네이버, "어학사전"

      8 이지민, "신상영역에서의 의사결정능력 - 영국법을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 20 (20): 91-126, 2013

      9 김이배, "성년후견제도입에 따른 실행체계 구축방안 연구" 경북행복재단 2013

      10 이현곤, "성년후견제도의 중간점검과 향후 과제" 법무법인율촌· 한국지적장애인복지협회 2014

      1 최윤영, "장애인성년후견제 운영방안" 한국지적장애인복지협회 2012

      2 정봉근, "의사결정지원제도의 도입 추진 방안" 년후견제도폐지추진연대 2015

      3 제철웅, "유엔 장애인 권리협약의 관점에서 본 한국의 성년후견제도: 현재와 미래" 법무법인 율촌·한국지적장애인복지협회 2014

      4 제철웅, "요보호성인의 인권존중의 관점에서 본 새로운 성년후견제도: 그 특징, 문제점 그리고 개선방안" 한국민사법학회 56 : 277-331, 2011

      5 김용득, "영국 커뮤니티케어의 이용자 참여 기제와 한국 장애인복지서비스에 대한 함의" 한국사회복지학회 57 (57): 363-387, 2005

      6 이명현, "영국 성년후견법을 통해 본 복지사회 구상: 의사결정능력법(Mental Capacity Act)의 자기결정 지원을 중심으로" 5.18연구소 12 (12): 407-444, 2012

      7 네이버, "어학사전"

      8 이지민, "신상영역에서의 의사결정능력 - 영국법을 중심으로 -" 한국비교사법학회 20 (20): 91-126, 2013

      9 김이배, "성년후견제도입에 따른 실행체계 구축방안 연구" 경북행복재단 2013

      10 이현곤, "성년후견제도의 중간점검과 향후 과제" 법무법인율촌· 한국지적장애인복지협회 2014

      11 백승흠, "성년후견제도의 입법방향" 18 : 156-200, 2010

      12 박미선, "성년후견제도의 문제점" 성년후견제도폐지추진연대 2015

      13 신권철, "성년후견제도의 도입과 법원의 역할" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 3-38, 2010

      14 박정선, "성년후견제도와 사회적 책임" 한국장애인복지학회 16 : 155-170, 2011

      15 신권철, "성년후견제도와 사회복지적 연계" 집문당 2013

      16 윤홍근, "성년후견제 2년 시행 점검" 법무법인 율촌·한국지적장애인복지협회 2015

      17 윤찬영, "사회복지서비스 신청권 판례의 의의와 과제" 149 (149): 24-29, 2011

      18 임성택, "사회복지사업법의 쟁점-사회복지서비스 신청권을 중심으로" 1 : 75-100, 2010

      19 이동희, "드워킨(R.Dworkin)의 도덕적 권리론 -구성적 모델과 권리 기저적 권리론-" 법학연구소 33 (33): 267-285, 2009

      20 秋元美世, "社會福祉の利用者と人權" 有斐閣 2010

      21 平田 厚, "権利擁護と福祉実践活動:概念と制度を問い直す" 明石書店 2012

      22 千葉華月, "最善の利益基準を考えるーイギリスにおける成年の精神無能力者に対する医療上の処置と同意" 11 : 167-175, 2000

      23 菅富美枝, "成年後見制度の新たなグランドデザイン" 法政大學大原社會問題硏究所 法定大學出版局 2013

      24 尾形健, "アメリカ憲法の群像" 尚学社 2010

      25 Simon, B, "Towards a Social Psychological Analysis of Politicized Collective Identity: Conceptualization, Antecedents, and Consequences" 56 (56): 319-331, 2008

      26 Blais, M. R, "Toward a motivational model of couple hapiness" 59 : 1021-1031, 1990

      27 Office of the Vulnerable Persons' Commissioner, "The Vulnerable Persons Living with A Mental Disability Act"

      28 Department of Health, "The Valuing People: A New Strategy for Learning Disability for the 21st Century(White Paper)"

      29 Dworkin, G, "The Theory and Practice of Autonomy" Cambridge University Press 1988

      30 Departmenr of Health, "The Second Year of the Independent Mental Capacity Advocacy Service"

      31 Baumeister, R, "The Need to Belong: Desire for Interpersonal Attachment as a Fundamental Human Motivation" 117 (117): 497-529, 1995

      32 Naquin, P. J, "The Need for Autonomy" Lousiana Tech University 2003

      33 Redley, M, "The Evaluation of The Pilot Independent Mental Capacity Advocate(IMCA) Service" Department of Health 2006

      34 "The Court of Protection Fees Order"

      35 Rock, M, "Sweet Blood and Social Suffering; Rethinking Cause-Effect Relationship in Diabetes, and Dures" 22 (22): 131-174, 2003

      36 Kohn, N. A, "Supported decision-making: A Viable Alternatives to Guardianship" 117 : 1111-1157, 2013

      37 Yukon Department of Health and Social Services, "Supported and Substitute Decision-Making for Adults" Goverment of Yukon 2002

      38 Wolfensberger, W, "Social Role Valorization: A Proposed New Term for the Principle of Normalization" 49 (49): 435-440, 2011

      39 Ryan, R. M, "Self-regulation and the Problem of Human Autonomy: Does Psychology Need Choice, Self-determination, and Will" 74 (74): 1557-1585, 2006

      40 Knee, C. R, "Self-determination and Conflict in Romantic Relationships" 89 (89): 997-1009, 2005

      41 Stevenson, G. S, "Principles, Patient Welfare and The Adults with Incapacity(Scotland) Act 2000" 30 : 120-126, 2000

      42 Department of Health, "No Secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi-agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse. para. 2, 3"

      43 "Mental Capacity Act General Regulation"

      44 London Borough of Richmond upon Tames, "Mental Capacity Act 2005: Guidance for Social Care Staff"

      45 "Mental Capacity Act"

      46 Office of the Public Guardian, "Making Decisions: The Independent Mental Capacity Advocate(IMCA) Service"

      47 Lord Chancellor's Department Consultation Paper, "Making Decisions: Helping People Who Have Difficulty Deciding for Themselves"

      48 Department for Constitutional Affaires, "Making Decisions: A Auide for People Who Work in Health and Social care"

      49 Action for Advocacy, "Lost in translation, towards an outcomes focused approach to advocacy provision"

      50 Raz, J, "Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy" Oxford University Press 313-314, 1987

      51 Department for Constitutional Affairs, "Draft Mental Incapacity Bill, Cm 5859-Ⅱ"

      52 Oxford Dictionaries, "Dictionary"

      53 Joseph Rowntree Foundation, "Demonstrating Control of Decisions by Adults with Learning Difficulties Who Have High Support Needs, Findings"

      54 Reis, H. T, "Daily Well-being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness" 26 : 419-433, 2000

      55 Action for Advocacy, "Code of Practice for Advocacy"

      56 Carney, T, "Beyond Elder Law: New Directions in Law and Aging" Springer Verlag 1-17, 2012

      57 Joyce, T, "Best interests" 8 (8): 481-483, 2009

      58 Ryan, R. M, "Agency and Organization: Intrinsic Motivation, Autonomy and The Self in Psychological Development" University of Nevraska Press 1-56, 1993

      59 Queensland Government, "A Journey Towards Autonomy? Supported Decision-Making in Theory and Practice"

      60 보건복지부, "2005년 국민기초생활보장사업안내"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.84 0.84 1.06
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.1 1.06 1.237 0.26
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼