主體性의 관점에서 본 茶山의 인간관 = View of Human Beings of Dasan(茶山) from the Viewpoint of 'Subject'

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The position of Dasan(茶山) in the history of the Theory of Human Nature(人性論) comes under the conclusion of Neo-Confucianism in Joseon(朝鮮) that closely reviewed Zhu Xi(朱熹). But, until now, embossing the aspect that his view of human beings is the opposite of Zhu Xi, the focus was only on the Theory of Nature(性說). Then, recently, the studies applying the issue of 'relationship' which is one of the main discourses of postmodernism are attempted, and the aspect of 'subject(主體)' is being embossed anew.
In view of the aspect of subject, the view of human beings of Dasan emphasizes the 'subjectivity' of human beings in all aspects of value judgment, recognition of existence and moral practice. Dasan does not recognize the orientation to good which is innate in human beings and the realistic desire that hinders the orientation from being revealed as a conflict. He rather lays stress on that thanks to their existence, our minds can weigh and judge the good and the evil. This is the subjectivity of human beings in the value judgment.
Next, Dasan finds the reason why human beings can be the subject of value judgment like this in Daoxan(道心). Daoxan is to request to be able to be convinced of our value judgment as Mencius did. Although this is called God's will(天命), it is only ourselves made as the other. Therefore, to recognize oneself as the subject of value judgment is the subjectivity of recognition of existence among the views of human beings of Dasan.
Finally, Dasan viewed that the values and judgment of the good and the evil can be made when the value judgment and recognition of existence are practiced concretely in reality. Dasan provides human beings as an existence of relationship put in a system. Of course, this provision is not something that can be found only in Dasan but what has been maintained in the Confucianist tradition always. But, Dasan emphasized that the subject of moral practice is oneself in this relationship, and this is the subjectivity of moral practice.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가는 말
• 2. 가치판단의 주체성으로 본 心之權衡
• 3. 존재인식의 주체성으로 본 天命寄在道心
• 4. 도덕실천의 주체성으로 본 嚮人之愛
• 5. 나오는 말
• [참고문헌]
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이동희, "한국사회에 있어서 ‘가족’의 의미와 ‘가족이기주의’ 문제" 유교문화연구소 1 (1): 159-172, 2009

2 김충렬, "천인관계를 둘러싼 논쟁의 기조, In 논쟁으로 보는 중국철학" 예문서원 1995

3 馮寓, "천인관계론" 신지서원 1993

4 金谷治, "중국사상사" 이론과 실천 1989

5 朱伯崑, "중국고대윤리학" 이론과 실천 1990

6 김병환, "중국 인성론의 특징과 유형" 한국외국어대학교 외국학종합연구센터 인문과학연구소 (7) : 31-56, 2002

7 길희성, "전통‧근대‧탈근대의 철학적 조명" 철학과 현실사 1999

8 여종현, "실존, 공간, 그리고 시간-공간개념의 실존론적 해명" 韓國哲學會 (40) : 232-267, 1993

9 이영경, "다산 정약용의 심성론에서 자유의지론의 문제와 윤리적 특징" 대동철학회 (38) : 1-20, 2007

10 문석윤, "다산 정약용의 새로운 도덕이론: 마음에 대한 새로운 이해" 대한철학회 90 : 81-106, 2004

11 H. G. Creel, "공자-인간과 신화" 지식산업사 1996

12 宋榮培, "諸子百家의 思想" 玄音社 1994

13 "荀子"

14 張福童, "茶山『論語古今注』의 經學的 分析" 全南大學校 大學院 1992

15 김치완, "茶山 人性論의 ‘反朱子的 근대성’에 관한 검토" 대동철학회 (45) : 1-27, 2008

16 張承姬, "茶山 丁若鏞 天人關係論의 倫理的 意義" 서울대학교 한국문화연구소 281-315,

17 "與猶堂全書"

18 趙湲來, "實學者의 官吏登用法 硏究" 白山學會 (23) : 261-304, 1977

19 "四書三經"

20 尹天根, "原始儒學의 새로운 解釋" 온누리 1987

21 安炳周, "儒敎의 民本思想에 관한 硏究-君主·民本으로부터 民主에로의 轉換可能狀態의 모색-" 成均館大學校 大學院 1986

22 李乙浩, "中庸思想, In 茶山學의 理解" 玄岩社 1977

23 譚宇權, "中庸哲學硏究" 文津出版社 1995

24 宋榮培, "中國社會思想史" 한길사 1988

25 馮友蘭, "中國哲學史, 上冊" 中華書局 1992

26 徐復觀, "中國人性論史, 先秦篇" 商務印書館 1990