RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

      미생물학과 감염 분야 논문 검색에 국내 문헌데이터베이스의 유용성 비교 = Comparison of the Utility of Korean Bibliographic Databases for Searching Domestic Literature Related to Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103905308

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There have been controversies as to which database is best for searching domestic medical literature. This study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of Korean bibliographic databases in identifying domestic literature related to microbiology and infectious diseases.
      Materials and Methods : Four bibliographic databases, including KoreaMed (www.koreamed.org), KISS (kiss.kstudy.com), KMbase (kmbase.medric.or.kr), and RISS (www.riss4u.net), were used for this study. One public bibliographic database, which discontinued its update, and other commercial database services were not evaluated. After performing searches utilizing representative terms related to microbiology and infectious diseases, numbers of retrieved results were compared. The results of bibliographic records gathered by using KoreaMed were compared with those of three other databases; only the journals published from 2001 to 2007 were taken into account.
      Results : The number of search results retrieved by using each of the four databases ranged from 3 to 5,444 records depending on the search terms. In general, more search results were identified with KMbase and RISS than with KoreaMed and KISS. The concordance rate of the search results, utilizing the same search terms, between KoreaMed and three other databases ranged from 0% to 93.3%. Bibliographic errors including wrong order of authors, misspelled authors’names, use of the old journal title, and duplicate records were found in all databases.
      Conclusions : Total number of results obtained from each of the four Korean bibliographic databases using the same search terms was different and discordant. Researchers are recommended to take into account their characteristics and limitations when using Korean bibliographic databases for medical researches.
      번역하기

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There...

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There have been controversies as to which database is best for searching domestic medical literature. This study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of Korean bibliographic databases in identifying domestic literature related to microbiology and infectious diseases.
      Materials and Methods : Four bibliographic databases, including KoreaMed (www.koreamed.org), KISS (kiss.kstudy.com), KMbase (kmbase.medric.or.kr), and RISS (www.riss4u.net), were used for this study. One public bibliographic database, which discontinued its update, and other commercial database services were not evaluated. After performing searches utilizing representative terms related to microbiology and infectious diseases, numbers of retrieved results were compared. The results of bibliographic records gathered by using KoreaMed were compared with those of three other databases; only the journals published from 2001 to 2007 were taken into account.
      Results : The number of search results retrieved by using each of the four databases ranged from 3 to 5,444 records depending on the search terms. In general, more search results were identified with KMbase and RISS than with KoreaMed and KISS. The concordance rate of the search results, utilizing the same search terms, between KoreaMed and three other databases ranged from 0% to 93.3%. Bibliographic errors including wrong order of authors, misspelled authors’names, use of the old journal title, and duplicate records were found in all databases.
      Conclusions : Total number of results obtained from each of the four Korean bibliographic databases using the same search terms was different and discordant. Researchers are recommended to take into account their characteristics and limitations when using Korean bibliographic databases for medical researches.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There have been controversies as to which database is best for searching domestic medical literature. This study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of Korean bibliographic databases in identifying domestic literature related to microbiology and infectious diseases.
      Materials and Methods : Four bibliographic databases, including KoreaMed (www.koreamed.org), KISS (kiss.kstudy.com), KMbase (kmbase.medric.or.kr), and RISS (www.riss4u.net), were used for this study. One public bibliographic database, which discontinued its update, and other commercial database services were not evaluated. After performing searches utilizing representative terms related to microbiology and infectious diseases, numbers of retrieved results were compared. The results of bibliographic records gathered by using KoreaMed were compared with those of three other databases; only the journals published from 2001 to 2007 were taken into account.
      Results : The number of search results retrieved by using each of the four databases ranged from 3 to 5,444 records depending on the search terms. In general, more search results were identified with KMbase and RISS than with KoreaMed and KISS. The concordance rate of the search results, utilizing the same search terms, between KoreaMed and three other databases ranged from 0% to 93.3%. Bibliographic errors including wrong order of authors, misspelled authors’names, use of the old journal title, and duplicate records were found in all databases.
      Conclusions : Total number of results obtained from each of the four Korean bibliographic databases using the same search terms was different and discordant. Researchers are recommended to take into account their characteristics and limitations when using Korean bibliographic databases for medical researches.
      번역하기

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There...

      Backgrounds : Korean bibliographic databases are used to search and retrieve domestic literature for research purposes. However, doubts about their accuracy, completeness, and coverage have been raised since their development and implementation. There have been controversies as to which database is best for searching domestic medical literature. This study was conducted to investigate the usefulness of Korean bibliographic databases in identifying domestic literature related to microbiology and infectious diseases.
      Materials and Methods : Four bibliographic databases, including KoreaMed (www.koreamed.org), KISS (kiss.kstudy.com), KMbase (kmbase.medric.or.kr), and RISS (www.riss4u.net), were used for this study. One public bibliographic database, which discontinued its update, and other commercial database services were not evaluated. After performing searches utilizing representative terms related to microbiology and infectious diseases, numbers of retrieved results were compared. The results of bibliographic records gathered by using KoreaMed were compared with those of three other databases; only the journals published from 2001 to 2007 were taken into account.
      Results : The number of search results retrieved by using each of the four databases ranged from 3 to 5,444 records depending on the search terms. In general, more search results were identified with KMbase and RISS than with KoreaMed and KISS. The concordance rate of the search results, utilizing the same search terms, between KoreaMed and three other databases ranged from 0% to 93.3%. Bibliographic errors including wrong order of authors, misspelled authors’names, use of the old journal title, and duplicate records were found in all databases.
      Conclusions : Total number of results obtained from each of the four Korean bibliographic databases using the same search terms was different and discordant. Researchers are recommended to take into account their characteristics and limitations when using Korean bibliographic databases for medical researches.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김일환, "국내학술지 검색 시스템 보완 및 최초 증례보고 기준 설정의 필요성" 대한피부과학회 46 (46): 7-7, 2008

      2 Jeong EC, "What doctors want from a medical library" 25 : 107-112, 1998

      3 Kim HB, "The prospective study on indexing of medical literature in Korea" 25 : 71-93, 1998

      4 Patrick LJ, "The literature review: demystifying the literature search" 30 : 30-34, 2004

      5 Rau JL, "Searching the literature and selecting the right references" 49 : 1242-1245, 2004

      6 Cho HM, "Search strategy for identifying medical literature for systematic reviews" 27 : S83-S88, 2006

      7 KERIS, "Research Information Service System"

      8 Chi JG, "Necessity of searching medical literature" 37 : 37-38, 1994

      9 Kim SY, "Literature review for research in family medicine" 25 : 428-438, 2004

      10 KSI, "Korean studies Information Service System"

      1 김일환, "국내학술지 검색 시스템 보완 및 최초 증례보고 기준 설정의 필요성" 대한피부과학회 46 (46): 7-7, 2008

      2 Jeong EC, "What doctors want from a medical library" 25 : 107-112, 1998

      3 Kim HB, "The prospective study on indexing of medical literature in Korea" 25 : 71-93, 1998

      4 Patrick LJ, "The literature review: demystifying the literature search" 30 : 30-34, 2004

      5 Rau JL, "Searching the literature and selecting the right references" 49 : 1242-1245, 2004

      6 Cho HM, "Search strategy for identifying medical literature for systematic reviews" 27 : S83-S88, 2006

      7 KERIS, "Research Information Service System"

      8 Chi JG, "Necessity of searching medical literature" 37 : 37-38, 1994

      9 Kim SY, "Literature review for research in family medicine" 25 : 428-438, 2004

      10 KSI, "Korean studies Information Service System"

      11 MedRIC, "Korean Medical database"

      12 KAMJE, "KoreaMed"

      13 Kim HB, "Indexing medical citations" Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 2000

      14 Lee JH, "Improving the circulation of medical information" 25 : 23-29, 1998

      15 Lee CS, "Evaluation of Korean medical journals: a bibliometric analysis" 17 : 49-65, 2000

      16 Doig GS, "Efficient literature searching: a core skill for the practice of evidence-based medicine" 29 : 2119-2127, 2003

      17 Kim SJ, "Distribution of Korean medical and life science journals" 32 : 4-27, 2005

      18 Kim SJ, "Distribution of Korean medical and life science journals" 32 : 4-27, 2005

      19 Cho SY, "A study on error data types in the KERIS Union Catalog: Focused on dissertation bibliographic database" 36 : 5-19, 2002

      20 Park JH, "A study of the service management of the Korean National Electronic Library of Medicine" Chung-Ang University 2006

      21 Cho SY, "A project for establishment of the Korean National Electronic Library of Medicine" Korea Education and Research Information Service 2005

      22 Song JY, "A Study of effective management of medical information" 33 : 331-349, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-02-25 학술지명변경 한글명 : 감염과화학요법 -> Infection and Chemotherapy
      외국어명 : Infection and Chemotherapy -> 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-08-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Infection and Chemotherapy KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (등재후보1차)
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-05-27 학술지등록 한글명 : 감염과화학요법
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.2 0.2 0.46 0.29
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼