RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    통신산업에의 필수설비원리의 적용

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76370406

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    “Essential Facilities” are those facilities which are indispensable to a business enterprise providing goods and services in a relevant market, but duplication of which is prohibited by law or otherwise impossible due to physical constraint and other obstacles. It is very important for the Essential Facilities to be made available to third parties in order to ensure that fair competition is effectively established. The “Essential Facilities doctrine” has been developed as a legal principle to regulate refusal to deal, which means a monopoly or monopolization in Sherman Act.
    The Essential Facilities doctrine is closely connected with a telecommunication industry. The liberalization is now in progress in telecommunication industries world wide, and the Essential Facilities doctrine has brought an important legal basis to such progress of liberalization. The concept of access and interconnection must be understood in context of the Essential Facilities doctrine in competition law.
    Art.5 Para.3 Subpara.3 and Para.4 Subpara.3 of Enforcement Decree of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(the Fair Trade Act) define denial of access to “essential elements” as interruption by a market-dominant business of its competitor's business activities and/or new market entry. Also the provisions requiring inter-connection and common use of networks in telecommunication have been codified before the Essential Facilities doctrine is ruled in the Fair Trade Act.
    When industry-specific regulations governing the Essential Facilities are applied, we should ensure that such regulations do not conflict with the legal regime for the Essential Facilities founded in the Fair Trade Act. From the procedural and substantive aspects of the regulatory scheme, mutual cooperation and consultation system among relevant regulatory agencies may have to be refined.
    번역하기

    “Essential Facilities” are those facilities which are indispensable to a business enterprise providing goods and services in a relevant market, but duplication of which is prohibited by law or otherwise impossible due to physical constraint and ot...

    “Essential Facilities” are those facilities which are indispensable to a business enterprise providing goods and services in a relevant market, but duplication of which is prohibited by law or otherwise impossible due to physical constraint and other obstacles. It is very important for the Essential Facilities to be made available to third parties in order to ensure that fair competition is effectively established. The “Essential Facilities doctrine” has been developed as a legal principle to regulate refusal to deal, which means a monopoly or monopolization in Sherman Act.
    The Essential Facilities doctrine is closely connected with a telecommunication industry. The liberalization is now in progress in telecommunication industries world wide, and the Essential Facilities doctrine has brought an important legal basis to such progress of liberalization. The concept of access and interconnection must be understood in context of the Essential Facilities doctrine in competition law.
    Art.5 Para.3 Subpara.3 and Para.4 Subpara.3 of Enforcement Decree of the Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade Act(the Fair Trade Act) define denial of access to “essential elements” as interruption by a market-dominant business of its competitor's business activities and/or new market entry. Also the provisions requiring inter-connection and common use of networks in telecommunication have been codified before the Essential Facilities doctrine is ruled in the Fair Trade Act.
    When industry-specific regulations governing the Essential Facilities are applied, we should ensure that such regulations do not conflict with the legal regime for the Essential Facilities founded in the Fair Trade Act. From the procedural and substantive aspects of the regulatory scheme, mutual cooperation and consultation system among relevant regulatory agencies may have to be refined.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 필수설비원리의 형성과 전개
    • Ⅲ. 통신산업과 필수설비원리
    • Ⅳ. 통신산업에서의 필수설비규제의 현황 -시내전화시장을 중심으로-
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라에서의 필수설비규제법제
    • Ⅰ. 들어가며
    • Ⅱ. 필수설비원리의 형성과 전개
    • Ⅲ. 통신산업과 필수설비원리
    • Ⅳ. 통신산업에서의 필수설비규제의 현황 -시내전화시장을 중심으로-
    • Ⅴ. 우리나라에서의 필수설비규제법제
    • 참고문헌
    • [Abstract]
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼