RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104781058

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Purpose: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification.
      Methods: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61.
      Results: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups.
      Conclusion: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) c...

      Purpose: Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification.
      Methods: We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61.
      Results: The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups.
      Conclusion: The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Puppa G, "TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues" 134 : 837-852, 2010

      2 Zaheer S, "Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum" 227 : 800-811, 1998

      3 den Dulk M, "Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial" 246 : 83-90, 2007

      4 Gunderson LL, "Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes" 28 : 256-263, 2010

      5 Gunderson LL, "Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data" 28 : 264-271, 2010

      6 Ceelen W, "Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review" 17 : 2847-2855, 2010

      7 De Ridder M, "Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer" 55 : 1681-, 2006

      8 Peng J, "Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive rectal cancer" 15 : 3118-3123, 2008

      9 Rinkus KM, "Prognostic significance of nodal disease following preoperative radiation for rectal adenocarcinoma" 68 : 482-487, 2002

      10 Lee HY, "Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma" 14 : 1712-1717, 2007

      1 Puppa G, "TNM staging system of colorectal carcinoma: a critical appraisal of challenging issues" 134 : 837-852, 2010

      2 Zaheer S, "Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum" 227 : 800-811, 1998

      3 den Dulk M, "Risk factors for adverse outcome in patients with rectal cancer treated with an abdominoperineal resection in the total mesorectal excision trial" 246 : 83-90, 2007

      4 Gunderson LL, "Revised tumor and node categorization for rectal cancer based on surveillance, epidemiology, and end results and rectal pooled analysis outcomes" 28 : 256-263, 2010

      5 Gunderson LL, "Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data" 28 : 264-271, 2010

      6 Ceelen W, "Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in stage III colorectal cancer: a systematic review" 17 : 2847-2855, 2010

      7 De Ridder M, "Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer" 55 : 1681-, 2006

      8 Peng J, "Prognostic significance of the metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive rectal cancer" 15 : 3118-3123, 2008

      9 Rinkus KM, "Prognostic significance of nodal disease following preoperative radiation for rectal adenocarcinoma" 68 : 482-487, 2002

      10 Lee HY, "Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio in node-positive colon carcinoma" 14 : 1712-1717, 2007

      11 Rosenberg R, "Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period" 248 : 968-978, 2008

      12 Sauer R, "Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer" 351 : 1731-1740, 2004

      13 Kapiteijn E, "Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer" 345 : 638-646, 2001

      14 Mekenkamp LJ, "Pathology Review Committee and the Co-operative Clinical Investigators. Lymph node retrieval in rectal cancer is dependent on many factors: the role of the tumor, the patient, the surgeon, the radiotherapist, and the pathologist" 33 : 1547-1553, 2009

      15 Park IJ, "Nodal stage of stage III colon cancer: the impact of metastatic lymph node ratio" 100 : 240-243, 2009

      16 Greene FL, "New tumor-node-metastasis staging strategy for node-positive (stage III) rectal cancer: an analysis" 22 : 1778-1784, 2004

      17 Dekker JW, "Metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III rectal cancer; prognostic significance in addition to the 7th edition of the TNM classification" 36 : 1180-1186, 2010

      18 Goldstein NS, "Lymph node recoveries from 2427 pT3 colorectal resection specimens spanning 45 years: recommendations for a minimum number of recovered lymph nodes based on predictive probabilities" 26 : 179-189, 2002

      19 Kobayashi H, "Lymph node ratio is a powerful prognostic index in patients with stage III distal rectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter study" 26 : 891-896, 2011

      20 Baxter NN, "Lymph node evaluation in colorectal cancer patients: a population-based study" 97 : 219-225, 2005

      21 Kim YS, "LYMPH NODE RATIO AS A PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH STAGE III RECTAL CANCER TREATED WITH TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOLLOWED BY CHEMORADIOTHERAPY" Elsevier 74 : 796-802, 2009

      22 Cook EF, "Empiric comparison of multivariate analytic techniques: advantages and disadvantages of recursive partitioning analysis" 37 : 721-731, 1984

      23 Moug SJ, "Comparison of positive lymph node ratio with an inflammation- based prognostic score in colorectal cancer" 98 : 282-286, 2011

      24 Berger AC, "Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes" 23 : 8706-8712, 2005

      25 Breiman L, "Classification and Regression Trees" Wadsworth International Group 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-03-13 학술지명변경 한글명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      외국어명 : Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy -> Annals of Coloproctolgy
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-11-26 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctolgy KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 대한대장항문학회지
      외국어명 : 미등록
      KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.08
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.07 0.06 0.312 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼