RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대시의 출현과 존재 방식 = The Emergence of Modern Poetry and Its Way of Existence

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102412473

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper aims to shed new light on the issue of `modernity` from the spot where modern poetry emerged and raise a fundamental question in the existing research from the perspective that it examined the emergence and aspects of modern poetry focusing on the formation of modern subject. When the process of reaching to modern free verse passing through the New Style Poetry(Shinchesi) is considered only from the dimension of a `style`, the aesthetical shape of an unstable and dynamic modern subject during the period when the modern poetry was appeared could go unobserved. Also, a developmental view the history of style is considering, cannot clear away the suspicion of fixing the issue of modern subjectivity as an ex post facto in a way that the week subjectivity in classical poetry was set with the emergence of modern free verse. In this aspect, the question raised by this paper, `the fatal linearity` a development scheme based on divisibility `from enlightenment to lyricism` or `from fixed verse to free verse` has, demands to look back at the spot where the modern poetry was emerged. The modern subject of this period showed an active side of judging the world and acting and a passive side of regressing into its inside at the same time. Then came the issue of Sijo. In fact, modern Sijo has been excluded from the research of modern poetry. It is because a modern Sijo was difficult to be examined from the perspective of both `modern poetry` and `classical poetry.` A modern Sijo was an exceptional phenomenon from the history of style and was also off from the developmental perspective. This paper intended to look at Sijo from the viewpoint of the formation of a modern subject deviating the standpoint of the history of style as much as possible. In this respect, it tries to examine modern Sijo by incorporating it into the history of modern poetry. Such history of modern Sijo is also a distinct trace of regulating the way of modern poetry in a diverse way.
      번역하기

      This paper aims to shed new light on the issue of `modernity` from the spot where modern poetry emerged and raise a fundamental question in the existing research from the perspective that it examined the emergence and aspects of modern poetry focusing...

      This paper aims to shed new light on the issue of `modernity` from the spot where modern poetry emerged and raise a fundamental question in the existing research from the perspective that it examined the emergence and aspects of modern poetry focusing on the formation of modern subject. When the process of reaching to modern free verse passing through the New Style Poetry(Shinchesi) is considered only from the dimension of a `style`, the aesthetical shape of an unstable and dynamic modern subject during the period when the modern poetry was appeared could go unobserved. Also, a developmental view the history of style is considering, cannot clear away the suspicion of fixing the issue of modern subjectivity as an ex post facto in a way that the week subjectivity in classical poetry was set with the emergence of modern free verse. In this aspect, the question raised by this paper, `the fatal linearity` a development scheme based on divisibility `from enlightenment to lyricism` or `from fixed verse to free verse` has, demands to look back at the spot where the modern poetry was emerged. The modern subject of this period showed an active side of judging the world and acting and a passive side of regressing into its inside at the same time. Then came the issue of Sijo. In fact, modern Sijo has been excluded from the research of modern poetry. It is because a modern Sijo was difficult to be examined from the perspective of both `modern poetry` and `classical poetry.` A modern Sijo was an exceptional phenomenon from the history of style and was also off from the developmental perspective. This paper intended to look at Sijo from the viewpoint of the formation of a modern subject deviating the standpoint of the history of style as much as possible. In this respect, it tries to examine modern Sijo by incorporating it into the history of modern poetry. Such history of modern Sijo is also a distinct trace of regulating the way of modern poetry in a diverse way.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김준오, "현대시의 방법론과 모더니티" 새미 135-157, 2009

      2 이혜원, "현대시 운율과 형식의 미학" 서정시학 33-50, 2015

      3 김흥규, "한국문학의 이해" 민음사 49-50, 1986

      4 유성호, "한국 현대시의 형상과 논리" 국학자료원 9-52, 1997

      5 김용직, "한국 현대시와 문화전통" 푸른사상 15-32, 2016

      6 김윤태, "한국 현대시와 리얼리티" 소명출판 70-92, 2001

      7 정한모, "한국 현대시 요람" 박영사 9-16, 1994

      8 백철, "신문학사조사" 신구문화사 17-, 1983

      9 유성호, "상징의 숲을 가로질러" 하늘연못 76-107, 1999

      10 김영민, "민족문학과 근대성" 문학과지성사 337-364, 1995

      1 김준오, "현대시의 방법론과 모더니티" 새미 135-157, 2009

      2 이혜원, "현대시 운율과 형식의 미학" 서정시학 33-50, 2015

      3 김흥규, "한국문학의 이해" 민음사 49-50, 1986

      4 유성호, "한국 현대시의 형상과 논리" 국학자료원 9-52, 1997

      5 김용직, "한국 현대시와 문화전통" 푸른사상 15-32, 2016

      6 김윤태, "한국 현대시와 리얼리티" 소명출판 70-92, 2001

      7 정한모, "한국 현대시 요람" 박영사 9-16, 1994

      8 백철, "신문학사조사" 신구문화사 17-, 1983

      9 유성호, "상징의 숲을 가로질러" 하늘연못 76-107, 1999

      10 김영민, "민족문학과 근대성" 문학과지성사 337-364, 1995

      11 김춘식, "미적 근대성과 동인지 문단" 소명출판사 17-95, 2003

      12 김학성, "근대논의 문제와 18세기 우리 시가" 도서출판이회 28 : 8-26, 2010

      13 黃鍾淵, "韓國文學의 近代와 反近代 : 1930年代 後半期 文學의 傳統主義 硏究" 東國大學校 大學院 1992

      14 오세영, "20세기한국시연구" 새문사 25-26, 1989

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.54 0.54 0.48
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.46 0.44 1.206 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼