RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      고등교육에서의 e-러닝 콘텐츠 실태와 시사점 = Current Status of e-Learning Contents in Higher Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75430240

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Higher Education in Korea have made a rapid progress in a quantitative aspect last 50 years. E-learning, which utilizes information technology actively in teaching and learning, is believed to contribute to the development of higher education. Even though e-learning has many merits and strengths, questions and issues on the quality of e-learning has been raised. In order to understand the roles of e-learning and suggest effective development strategies, a more comprehensive study which investigates the e-learning contents status is urgent. This study had two primary purposes, which are germane to the universities in Korea: 1) To identify current status of e-learning contents; 2) to identify implications for further development of e-learning. The population for this study is universities in Korea. Once the web-based survey questionnaire was delivered to all universities, 194 universities replied the survey. The return rate is 96.5%. The major finding of this study are as follows: 1) The ratio of providing e-learning service is 56.7% in universities; 2) the e-learning provision ratio depends on the size of the higher education institute in terms of the number of the students; 3) the number of the e-learning contents has been doubled since 2005; 4) almost 90% of e-learning contents is instructor-centered and most e-learning contents contains video lectures.. Based on the above result, several implications for further development are made. Among them, the followings are important: 1) Establish differentiated strategies according to size, location, and types of universities, 2) assure advanced quality of the contents, 3) enlarge networks among universities, and 4) develop professional organization and staff.
      번역하기

      Higher Education in Korea have made a rapid progress in a quantitative aspect last 50 years. E-learning, which utilizes information technology actively in teaching and learning, is believed to contribute to the development of higher education. Even th...

      Higher Education in Korea have made a rapid progress in a quantitative aspect last 50 years. E-learning, which utilizes information technology actively in teaching and learning, is believed to contribute to the development of higher education. Even though e-learning has many merits and strengths, questions and issues on the quality of e-learning has been raised. In order to understand the roles of e-learning and suggest effective development strategies, a more comprehensive study which investigates the e-learning contents status is urgent. This study had two primary purposes, which are germane to the universities in Korea: 1) To identify current status of e-learning contents; 2) to identify implications for further development of e-learning. The population for this study is universities in Korea. Once the web-based survey questionnaire was delivered to all universities, 194 universities replied the survey. The return rate is 96.5%. The major finding of this study are as follows: 1) The ratio of providing e-learning service is 56.7% in universities; 2) the e-learning provision ratio depends on the size of the higher education institute in terms of the number of the students; 3) the number of the e-learning contents has been doubled since 2005; 4) almost 90% of e-learning contents is instructor-centered and most e-learning contents contains video lectures.. Based on the above result, several implications for further development are made. Among them, the followings are important: 1) Establish differentiated strategies according to size, location, and types of universities, 2) assure advanced quality of the contents, 3) enlarge networks among universities, and 4) develop professional organization and staff.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼