사회철학적 의사소통과 태권도 = Philosophical Society communication and Taekwondo

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to mark several categories such as, the Knowledge that Taekwondo Communication’s propriety claims(When doing Taekwondo, the event of a propositional truth, normative legitimacy, or subjective truth) can become a symbolic pattern through these speeches(sports media). We need to conduct even more detailed analysis on these remarks from two different perspectives; the justification on Taekwondo society(gymnasiums, stadium) and for people involved in taekwondo relations to something that the real world could use. Habermas’s communicative actions theory created a framework for this study and this was the result. First is the teleological action model, in which the speaker’s language on his own success, Taekwondo is one among several sports were it is influenced on opinion and other people in order to meet their interests. Second, is the normative behavior model where the language is seen as more sports pop culture that is supported by verbal agreement through Taekwondo. The mutual understanding and cultural traditions that will be inherited through actions. Such a view of cultural liberality should be more widespread in content-oriented linguistics rather than the interpretation of a result is called cultural ills in Sports cultural anthropology and Taekwondo. This is the dramatic act model. This language in the Taekwondo world is a self-reproduction of the core concepts, however, this does not call for voluntary act of expressions. With the audience in mind, a series of stylized representation of the experience can be associated with their performances. The dramatic act model is the primary occurrence in many sport phenomenology and is useful to describe the interactions, depending on the player and the environmental situation.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 장춘익, "의사소통행위이론 II(기능주의적 이성 비판을 위하여)" 나남출판사 2006

2 장춘익, "의사소통행위이론 I(행위합리성과 사회합리화)" 나남출판사 2006

3 강병호, "물화(인정 이론적 탐구)" 나남출판사 2006

4 김정아, "감정자본주의(감정은 자본을 어떻게 활용하는가)" 돌베개 2013

5 Goffman, E., "Wir spielen alle Theater, Die Selbstdarstellung im Alltag" München 3-, 1969

6 Popper, K. R., "The Self and its Brain" New York, Heidelberg 38-, 1977

7 Popper, K. R, "The Philosophy of K. Popper, 제2권" La Salle, I11 1050-, 1974

8 Höffe, O., "Strategien der Humanität" München 77-, 1975

9 Luce, R. D., "Spieltheorie, und Sozialwissenschaften" Frankfurt/M., Heidelberg 1965

10 Ekeh, P. P., "Social Exchange Theory" London 1964

11 Honneth., "Pathologien des Sozialen, in: Honneth"

12 Popper, K. R., "Objective Erkenntnis" Heidelberg 123-, 1973

13 Harre, S., "Language and Human Nature" Carleton University 215-, 1972

14 Gaefgen, G., "Handlungstheorien, 제1권" München 249-, 1980

15 Bubner, R., "Handlung, Sprache und Vernunft" Frankfurt/M 66-, 1976

16 Sarbin, Th. R., "Handbook of Social Psychology, 제1권" Cambridge 223-258, 1954

17 I. C. Jarvie, "Die Logik der Gesellschaft" München 254-255, 1974

18 I. C. Jarvie., "Die Logik der Gesellschaft" München 227-, 1974

19 Hartmann, N., "Das Problem des geistigen Seins" Berlin 1932

20 Gerth, H., "Character and Social Structure" New York 1953