RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    번역의 시대, 번역가의 목소리: 손성준, 『중역한 영웅: 근대전환기 한국의 서구영웅전 수용』, 소명출판, 2023 = The Age of Translation, the Voice of Translators: After Reading Relay Translations of Biographies of Western Heroes in Korea During the Modern Transition Period(2023)

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108736464

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This article is a book review of Son Sung-jun’s Relay Translations of Biographies of Western Heroes in Korea During the Modern Transition Period. In order to examine the research-historical significance of this book, this article focuses on the activism of the translating subject and the three-dimensional nature of the translated text. The translated hero during the modern transition period was a channel for acquiring world historical knowledge and reflected the guidelines for overcoming the times. However, the Western hero had a variable that could be mistaken for an empire builder. Moreover, Joseon was not in a position to accept the logic of the strong. In this respect, the author does not interpret the translation of the Western heroic novel as an indiscriminate follower of imperialism, but suggests the possibility of reading it as a Korean variant of the theory of social evolution. The biography of Western heroes provided an opportunity to sense the meaning and possibility of the ‘revolution’ and made it possible to imagine various political bodies.
    In particular, the author paid attention to Liang Qichao in terms of creating a new original. Liang Qichao’s translation served as a ‘transistor’ to allow the heroes to be observed from various angles. The method of interpreting the same object in different ways was not limited to translation between languages. The author emphasised ‘internal diversity’ by excavating the voices of several translators, rather than defining the shape of the hero as changed by the translator's intention and purpose as ‘national specificity’.
    Son Sung-jun’s discussion is an important research achievement that specifically shows the East Asian traversal of modern knowledge based on empirical analysis. This article sheds light on the significance of this book, focusing on the author's restoration of the subjective voice of the translator and the presentation of the dynamism and diversity of knowledge through the heroes of the modern transitional period.
    번역하기

    This article is a book review of Son Sung-jun’s Relay Translations of Biographies of Western Heroes in Korea During the Modern Transition Period. In order to examine the research-historical significance of this book, this article focuses on the acti...

    This article is a book review of Son Sung-jun’s Relay Translations of Biographies of Western Heroes in Korea During the Modern Transition Period. In order to examine the research-historical significance of this book, this article focuses on the activism of the translating subject and the three-dimensional nature of the translated text. The translated hero during the modern transition period was a channel for acquiring world historical knowledge and reflected the guidelines for overcoming the times. However, the Western hero had a variable that could be mistaken for an empire builder. Moreover, Joseon was not in a position to accept the logic of the strong. In this respect, the author does not interpret the translation of the Western heroic novel as an indiscriminate follower of imperialism, but suggests the possibility of reading it as a Korean variant of the theory of social evolution. The biography of Western heroes provided an opportunity to sense the meaning and possibility of the ‘revolution’ and made it possible to imagine various political bodies.
    In particular, the author paid attention to Liang Qichao in terms of creating a new original. Liang Qichao’s translation served as a ‘transistor’ to allow the heroes to be observed from various angles. The method of interpreting the same object in different ways was not limited to translation between languages. The author emphasised ‘internal diversity’ by excavating the voices of several translators, rather than defining the shape of the hero as changed by the translator's intention and purpose as ‘national specificity’.
    Son Sung-jun’s discussion is an important research achievement that specifically shows the East Asian traversal of modern knowledge based on empirical analysis. This article sheds light on the significance of this book, focusing on the author's restoration of the subjective voice of the translator and the presentation of the dynamism and diversity of knowledge through the heroes of the modern transitional period.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한성순보"

    2 "태극학보"

    3 손성준, "중역한 영웅 : 근대전환기 한국의 서구영웅전 수용" 소명출판 2023

    4 에릭 홉스봄, "제국의 시대" 한길사 2022

    5 손성준, "영웅서사의 동아시아 수용과 중역의 원본성 : 서구 텍스트의 한국적 재맥락화를 중심으로" 성균관대학교 대학원 2012

    6 야마무로 신이치, "사상과제로서의 아시아" 소명출판 2018

    7 황종연, "문학에서의 역사와 반(反)역사 - 이기영의 『고향』을 중심으로" 민족문학사연구소 (67) : 171-213, 2018

    8 "독립신문"

    9 "대한흥학보"

    10 손성준, "대한제국기의 「멸국신법론」 다중 번역 - 『조양보』와 『월남망국사』 판본을 중심으로 -" 국제어문학회 (95) : 275-310, 2022

    1 "한성순보"

    2 "태극학보"

    3 손성준, "중역한 영웅 : 근대전환기 한국의 서구영웅전 수용" 소명출판 2023

    4 에릭 홉스봄, "제국의 시대" 한길사 2022

    5 손성준, "영웅서사의 동아시아 수용과 중역의 원본성 : 서구 텍스트의 한국적 재맥락화를 중심으로" 성균관대학교 대학원 2012

    6 야마무로 신이치, "사상과제로서의 아시아" 소명출판 2018

    7 황종연, "문학에서의 역사와 반(反)역사 - 이기영의 『고향』을 중심으로" 민족문학사연구소 (67) : 171-213, 2018

    8 "독립신문"

    9 "대한흥학보"

    10 손성준, "대한제국기의 「멸국신법론」 다중 번역 - 『조양보』와 『월남망국사』 판본을 중심으로 -" 국제어문학회 (95) : 275-310, 2022

    11 손성준, "대한제국기 미디어의 콜럼버스 수용: 『독립신문』, 『유몽천자』, 『그리스도신문』, 량치차오라는 매개를 중심으로" 한국문학연구소 (71) : 175-220, 2023

    12 "대한매일신보"

    13 손성준, "근대문학의 역학들 : 번역 주체‧동아시아‧식민지 제도" 소명출판 2019

    14 김준현, "『청춘』의 ‘세계문학개관’ 저본에 대한 검토 (1) -최남선과 마쓰우라 마사야스(松浦政泰)-" 국제한국문학문화학회 (24) : 9-41, 2018

    15 손성준, "「이태리건국삼걸전」의 동아시아 수용양상과 그 성격" 성균관대학교 대학원 2007

    16 노연숙, "20세기 초 동아시아 정치서사에 나타난 ‘애국’의 양상" 한국현대문학회 (28) : 7-34, 2009

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼